PreprintCited by 4AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

A self-supervised framework for learning whole slide representations

Open access
Hou, Xinhai, Jiang, Cheng, Kondepudi, Akhil, Lyu, Yiwei, Chowdury, Asadur, Lee, Honglak, Hollon, Todd C.·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Whole slide imaging is fundamental to biomedical microscopy and computational pathology. Previously, learning representations for gigapixel-sized whole slide images (WSIs) has relied on multiple instance learning with weak labels, which do not annotate the diverse morphologic features and spatial heterogeneity of WSIs. A high-quality self-supervised learning method for WSIs would provide transferable visual representations for downstream computational pathology tasks, without the need for dense annotations. We present Slide Pre-trained Transformers (SPT) for gigapixel-scale self-supervision of WSIs. Treating WSI patches as tokens, SPT combines data transformation strategies from language and vision modeling into a general and unified framework to generate views of WSIs for self-supervised pretraining. SPT leverages the inherent regional heterogeneity, histologic feature variability, and information redundancy within WSIs to learn high-quality whole slide representations. We benchmark SPT visual representations on five diagnostic tasks across three biomedical microscopy datasets. SPT significantly outperforms baselines for histopathologic diagnosis, cancer subtyping, and genetic mutation prediction. Finally, we demonstrate that SPT consistently improves whole slide representations when using off-the-shelf, in-domain, and foundational patch encoders for whole slide multiple instance learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2402.06188

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous works on pretraining slide foundation models are predominantly pretrained using vision-only modeling, which neglects rich supervisory signals found in pathology reports and precludes multimodal capabilities such as zero-shot visual-language understanding and cross-model retrieval.

    “First, these models are predominantly pretrained using vision-only modeling57,59,60, which neglects not only rich supervisory signals found in pathology reports but also precludes multimodal capabilities such as zero-shot visual-language understanding and cross-model retrieval—a fundamental hallmark in foundation models84,85.”

    From A multimodal whole-slide foundation model for pathology (2025) · cites this paper as [60]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • New types of foundation models have recently been proposed for encoding entire WSIs into slide-level general-purpose feature representations.

    “To overcome these limitations, new types of foundation models have recently been proposed for encoding entire WSIs into slide-level general-purpose feature representations57–72.”

    From A multimodal whole-slide foundation model for pathology (2025) · cites this paper as [60]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Xinliang Zhu, Jiawen Yao, Feiyun Zhu, and Junzhou Huang. Wsisa: Making survival prediction from whole slide histopathological images. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7234-7242, 2017.
  2. Maximilian Ilse, Jakub Tomczak, and Max Welling. Attention-based deep multiple instance learning. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2127-2136. PMLR, 2018.
  3. Ming Y Lu, Drew FK Williamson, Tiffany Y Chen, Richard J Chen, Matteo Barbieri, and Faisal Mahmood. Data-efficient and weakly supervised computational pathology on whole-slide images. Nature biomedical engineering, 5(6):555-570, 2021.
  4. Zhuchen Shao, Hao Bian, Yang Chen, Yifeng Wang, Jian Zhang, Xiangyang Ji, et al. Transmil: Transformer based correlated multiple instance learning for whole slide image classification. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:2136-2147, 2021.
  5. Richard J Chen, Chengkuan Chen, Yicong Li, Tiffany Y Chen, Andrew D Trister, Rahul G Krishnan, and Faisal Mahmood. Scaling vision transformers to gigapixel images via hierarchical self-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16144-16155, 2022.
  6. Syed Ashar Javed, Dinkar Juyal, Harshith Padigela, Amaro Taylor-Weiner, Limin Yu, and Aa- ditya Prakash. Additive mil: intrinsically interpretable multiple instance learning for pathology. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:20689-20702, 2022.
  7. Richard J Chen, Tong Ding, Ming Y Lu, Drew FK Williamson, Guillaume Jaume, Andrew H Song, Bowen Chen, Andrew Zhang, Daniel Shao, Muhammad Shaban, et al. Towards a general- purpose foundation model for computational pathology. Nature Medicine, 30(3):850-862, 2024.
  8. Todd Hollon, Cheng Jiang, Asadur Chowdury, Mustafa Nasir-Moin, Akhil Kondepudi, Alexan- der Aabedi, Arjun Adapa, Wajd Al-Holou, Jason Heth, Oren Sagher, et al. Artificial-intelligence- based molecular classification of diffuse gliomas using rapid, label-free optical imaging. Nature Medicine, 29(4):828-832, 2023.
  9. Nicolas Coudray, Paolo Santiago Ocampo, Theodore Sakellaropoulos, Navneet Narula, Matija Snuderl, David Fenyö, Andre L Moreira, Narges Razavian, and Aristotelis Tsirigos. Classifica- tion and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning. Nature medicine, 24(10):1559-1567, 2018.
  10. Richard J Chen, Ming Y Lu, Drew FK Williamson, Tiffany Y Chen, Jana Lipkova, Zahra Noor, Muhammad Shaban, Maha Shady, Mane Williams, Bumjin Joo, et al. Pan-cancer integrative histology-genomic analysis via multimodal deep learning. Cancer Cell, 40(8):865-878, 2022.
  11. Bin Li, Yin Li, and Kevin W Eliceiri. Dual-stream multiple instance learning network for whole slide image classification with self-supervised contrastive learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 14318-14328, 2021.
  12. Gabriele Campanella, Matthew G Hanna, Luke Geneslaw, Allen Miraflor, Vitor Werneck Krauss Silva, Klaus J Busam, Edi Brogi, Victor E Reuter, David S Klimstra, and Thomas J Fuchs. Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images. Nature medicine, 25(8):1301-1309, 2019.
  13. Cheng Jiang, Xinhai Hou, Akhil Kondepudi, Asadur Chowdury, Christian W Freudiger, Daniel A Orringer, Honglak Lee, and Todd C Hollon. Hierarchical discriminative learning improves visual representations of biomedical microscopy. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19798-19808, 2023.
  14. Zhi Huang, Federico Bianchi, Mert Yuksekgonul, Thomas J Montine, and James Zou. A visual-language foundation model for pathology image analysis using medical twitter. Nature medicine, 29(9):2307-2316, 2023.
  15. Tristan Lazard, Marvin Lerousseau, Etienne Decencière, and Thomas Walter. Giga-ssl: Self- supervised learning for gigapixel images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 4305-4314, 2023.
  16. Ting Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, and Geoffrey Hinton. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1597-1607. PMLR, 2020.
  17. Jean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec, Pierre Richemond, Elena Buchatskaya, Carl Doersch, Bernardo Avila Pires, Zhaohan Guo, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, et al. Bootstrap your own latent-a new approach to self-supervised learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:21271-21284, 2020.
  18. Adrien Bardes, Jean Ponce, and Yann LeCun. Vicreg: Variance-invariance-covariance regular- ization for self-supervised learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  19. Prannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna, Yonglong Tian, Phillip Isola, Aaron Maschinot, Ce Liu, and Dilip Krishnan. Supervised contrastive learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:18661-18673, 2020.
  20. Ming Y Lu, Tiffany Y Chen, Drew FK Williamson, Melissa Zhao, Maha Shady, Jana Lipkova, and Faisal Mahmood. Ai-based pathology predicts origins for cancers of unknown primary. Nature, 594(7861):106-110, 2021.
  21. Todd C Hollon, Balaji Pandian, Arjun R Adapa, Esteban Urias, Akshay V Save, Siri Sahib S Khalsa, Daniel G Eichberg, Randy S D'Amico, Zia U Farooq, Spencer Lewis, et al. Near real-time intraoperative brain tumor diagnosis using stimulated raman histology and deep neural networks. Nature medicine, 26(1):52-58, 2020.
  22. Richard J Chen, Ming Y Lu, Wei-Hung Weng, Tiffany Y Chen, Drew FK Williamson, Trevor Manz, Maha Shady, and Faisal Mahmood. Multimodal co-attention transformer for survival prediction in gigapixel whole slide images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4015-4025, 2021.
  23. Chengkuan Chen, Ming Y Lu, Drew FK Williamson, Tiffany Y Chen, Andrew J Schaumberg, and Faisal Mahmood. Fast and scalable search of whole-slide images via self-supervised deep learning. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 6(12):1420-1434, 2022.
  24. Thomas G Dietterich, Richard H Lathrop, and Tomás Lozano-Pérez. Solving the multiple instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Artificial intelligence, 89(1-2):31-71, 1997.
  25. Le Hou, Dimitris Samaras, Tahsin M Kurc, Yi Gao, James E Davis, and Joel H Saltz. Patch- based convolutional neural network for whole slide tissue image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2424-2433, 2016.
  26. Jiawen Yao, Xinliang Zhu, and Junzhou Huang. Deep multi-instance learning for survival prediction from whole slide images. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2019: 22nd International Conference, Shenzhen, China, October 13-17, 2019, Proceedings, Part I 22, pages 496-504. Springer, 2019.
  27. Weijian Li, Viet-Duy Nguyen, Haofu Liao, Matt Wilder, Ke Cheng, and Jiebo Luo. Patch transformer for multi-tagging whole slide histopathology images. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2019: 22nd International Conference, Shenzhen, China, October 13-17, 2019, Proceedings, Part I 22, pages 532-540. Springer, 2019.
  28. Tiancheng Lin, Zhimiao Yu, Hongyu Hu, Yi Xu, and Chang-Wen Chen. Interventional bag multi-instance learning on whole-slide pathological images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19830-19839, 2023.
  29. Ashish Jaiswal, Ashwin Ramesh Babu, Mohammad Zaki Zadeh, Debapriya Banerjee, and Fillia Makedon. A survey on contrastive self-supervised learning. Technologies, 9(1):2, 2020.
  30. Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781, 2013. · arXiv
  31. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018. · arXiv
  32. Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019.
  33. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877-1901, 2020.
  34. Ming Y Lu, Bowen Chen, Andrew Zhang, Drew FK Williamson, Richard J Chen, Tong Ding, Long Phi Le, Yung-Sung Chuang, and Faisal Mahmood. Visual language pretrained multiple instance zero-shot transfer for histopathology images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19764-19775, 2023.
  35. Maxime Oquab, Timothée Darcet, Théo Moutakanni, Huy Vo, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza, Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, et al. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193, 2023. · arXiv
  36. Sobhan Hemati, Shivam Kalra, Cameron Meaney, Morteza Babaie, Ali Ghodsi, and Hamid Tizhoosh. Cnn and deep sets for end-to-end whole slide image representation learning. In Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, pages 301-311. PMLR, 2021.
  37. Xiyue Wang, Jinxi Xiang, Jun Zhang, Sen Yang, Zhongyi Yang, Ming-Hui Wang, Jing Zhang, Wei Yang, Junzhou Huang, and Xiao Han. Scl-wc: Cross-slide contrastive learning for weakly- supervised whole-slide image classification. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:18009-18021, 2022.
  38. Thomas E Tavolara, Metin N Gurcan, and M Khalid Khan Niazi. Contrastive multiple instance learning: An unsupervised framework for learning slide-level representations of whole slide histopathology images without labels. Cancers, 14(23):5778, 2022.
  39. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  40. Randall Balestriero, Mark Ibrahim, Vlad Sobal, Ari Morcos, Shashank Shekhar, Tom Goldstein, Florian Bordes, Adrien Bardes, Gregoire Mialon, Yuandong Tian, et al. A cookbook of self-supervised learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12210, 2023. · arXiv
  41. Yonglong Tian, Chen Sun, Ben Poole, Dilip Krishnan, Cordelia Schmid, and Phillip Isola. What makes for good views for contrastive learning? Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6827-6839, 2020.
  42. Ravid Shwartz Ziv and Yann LeCun. To compress or not to Compress-Self-Supervised learning and information theory: A review. Entropy, 26(3), March 2024.
  43. Mathilde Caron, Ishan Misra, Julien Mairal, Priya Goyal, Piotr Bojanowski, and Armand Joulin. Unsupervised learning of visual features by contrasting cluster assignments. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:9912-9924, 2020.
  44. Mathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou, Julien Mairal, Piotr Bojanowski, and Armand Joulin. Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 9650-9660, 2021.
  45. Kaiming He, Xinlei Chen, Saining Xie, Yanghao Li, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Girshick. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 16000-16009, 2022.
  46. Christian W. Freudiger, Wei Min, Brian G. Saar, Sijia Lu, Gary R. Holtom, Chengwei He, Jason C. Tsai, Jing X. Kang, and X. Sunney Xie. Label-free biomedical imaging with high sensitivity by stimulated raman scattering microscopy. Science, 322(5909):1857-1861, 2008.
  47. Daniel A Orringer, Balaji Pandian, Yashar S Niknafs, Todd C Hollon, Julianne Boyle, Spencer Lewis, Mia Garrard, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper, Hugh JL Garton, Cormac O Maher, et al. Rapid intraoperative histology of unprocessed surgical specimens via fibre-laser-based stimulated raman scattering microscopy. Nature biomedical engineering, 1(2):0027, 2017.
  48. Cheng Jiang, Asadur Zaman Chowdury, Xinhai Hou, Akhil Kondepudi, Christian Freudiger, Kyle Stephen Conway, Sandra Camelo-Piragua, Daniel A Orringer, Honglak Lee, and Todd Hollon. OpenSRH: optimizing brain tumor surgery using intraoperative stimulated raman histology. In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2022.
  49. Thomas Roetzer-Pejrimovsky, Anna-Christina Moser, Baran Atli, Clemens Christian Vogel, Petra A Mercea, Romana Prihoda, Ellen Gelpi, Christine Haberler, Romana Höftberger, Jo- hannes A Hainfellner, et al. the digital brain tumour atlas, an open histopathology resource. Scientific Data, 9(1):55, 2022.
  50. David N Louis, Arie Perry, Pieter Wesseling, Daniel J Brat, Ian A Cree, Dominique Figarella- Branger, Cynthia Hawkins, HK Ng, Stefan M Pfister, Guido Reifenberger, et al. The 2021 who classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro-oncology, 23(8):1231-1251, 2021.
  51. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770-778, 2016.
  52. Yang Li, Si Si, Gang Li, Cho-Jui Hsieh, and Samy Bengio. Learnable fourier features for multi-dimensional spatial positional encoding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:15816-15829, 2021.
  53. Marc Macenko, Marc Niethammer, James S Marron, David Borland, John T Woosley, Xiaojun Guan, Charles Schmitt, and Nancy E Thomas. A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis. In 2009 IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro, pages 1107-1110. IEEE, 2009.
  54. Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hou, X., Jiang, C., Kondepudi, A., Lyu, Y., Chowdury, A., Lee, H., & Hollon, T. C.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391766533
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ian's Friends Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM141746)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K12NS080223, F31NS135973)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
whole slide images, self-supervised learning, computational pathology, histopathological diagnosis, cancer subtyping, multiple instance learning, vision transformer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review