Scaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of Experts
Open accessAbstract
Mixture of Experts (MoE) models have emerged as a primary solution for reducing the computational cost of Large Language Models. In this work, we analyze their scaling properties, incorporating an expanded range of variables. Specifically, we introduce a new hyperparameter, granularity, whose adjustment enables precise control over the size of the experts. Building on this, we establish scaling laws for fine-grained MoE, taking into account the number of training tokens, model size, and granularity. Leveraging these laws, we derive the optimal training configuration for a given computational budget. Our findings not only show that MoE models consistently outperform dense Transformers but also highlight that the efficiency gap between dense and MoE models widens as we scale up the model size and training budget. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the common practice of setting the size of experts in MoE to mirror the feed-forward layer is not optimal at almost any computational budget.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Krajewski et al. [2024] extended this to fine-grained MoE, introducing granularity as an explicit variable in the scaling law and deriving compute-optimal settings that jointly choose model size, number of tokens, and expert granularity.
“Krajewski et al. [2024] extended this to fine-grained MoE, introducing granularity as an explicit variable in the scaling law and deriving compute-optimal settings that jointly choose model size, number of tokens, and expert granularity.”
From Training Compute-Optimal Transformer Models: A Review of Scaling Laws, Allocation, and Practice (2026) · cites this paper as Krajewski et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · Cited by 1,749 · cited 5× · see citing works
“As per Kaplan et al. (2020) and Hoffmann et al. (2022), maintaining a constant dataset size while scaling up the neural network size leads to undertraining, resulting in a model that does not perform to its full potential.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Richard P. Brent. An algorithm with guaranteed convergence for finding a zero of a function. Comput. J., 14:422-425, 1971. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 10312755.
- Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8): 1735-1780, 1997.
- Peter J. Huber. Robust Estimation of a Location Parameter. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35(1):73 -101, 1964. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177703732. URL https://doi.org/10.1214/ aoms/1177703732. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Training Compute-Optimal Transformer Models: A Review of Scaling Laws, Allocation, and Practice
Memming, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7142719
- Authors
- Krajewski, J., Ludziejewski, J., Adamczewski, K., Pióro, M., Krutul, M., Antoniak, S., Ciebiera, K., Król, K., Odrzygóźdź, T., Sankowski, P., Cygan, M., & Jaszczur, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Warsaw (PL)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2402.07871
- OpenAlex
- W4391801203
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Nvidia
- Uniwersytet Warszawski
- Infrastruktura PL-Grid
- Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju (POIR.01.01, POIR.01.01.01-00-0392/17-00)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- mixture of experts, scaling laws, model size, computational efficiency, large language models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review