eCeLLM: Generalizing Large Language Models for E-commerce from Large-scale, High-quality Instruction Data
Open accessAbstract
With tremendous efforts on developing effective e-commerce models, conventional e-commerce models show limited success in generalist e-commerce modeling, and suffer from unsatisfactory performance on new users and new products - a typical out-of-domain generalization challenge. Meanwhile, large language models (LLMs) demonstrate outstanding performance in generalist modeling and out-of-domain generalizability in many fields. Toward fully unleashing their power for e-commerce, in this paper, we construct ECInstruct, the first open-sourced, large-scale, and high-quality benchmark instruction dataset for e-commerce. Leveraging ECInstruct, we develop eCeLLM, a series of e-commerce LLMs, by instruction-tuning general-purpose LLMs. Our comprehensive experiments and evaluation demonstrate that eCeLLM models substantially outperform baseline models, including the most advanced GPT-4, and the state-of-the-art task-specific models in in-domain evaluation. Moreover, eCeLLM exhibits excellent generalizability to out-of-domain settings, including unseen products and unseen instructions, highlighting its superiority as a generalist e-commerce model. Both the ECInstruct dataset and the eCeLLM models show great potential in empowering versatile and effective LLMs for e-commerce. ECInstruct and eCeLLM models are publicly accessible through https://ninglab.github.io/eCeLLM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peng et al. (2024) show that instruction-tuning LLMs on large-scale e-commerce data meaningfully improves generalization to unseen products and tasks.
“Domain-specific evidence reinforces this shift: Peng et al. (2024) show that instruction-tuning LLMs on large-scale e-commerce data meaningfully improves generalization to unseen products and tasks, and Hou et al. (2024) introduce Amazon Reviews 2023 together with a complex product search setting that emphasizes long, natural-language shopping contexts-the same regime E-GEO targets.”
From E-GEO: A Testbed for Generative Engine Optimization in E-Commerce (2025) · cites this paper as Peng et al., 2024
Cited by
Sorted by citations
E-GEO: A Testbed for Generative Engine Optimization in E-Commerce
Bagga, P. S., Farias, V. F., Korkotashvili, T., Peng, T., & Wu, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.20867 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Allouah, A., Besbes, O., Figueroa, J. D., Kanoria, Y., & Kumar, A. (2025) · arXiv
- Authors
- Peng, B., Ling, X., Chen, Z., Sun, H., & Ning, X.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2402.08831
- OpenAlex
- W4391835378
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- e-commerce, large language models, instruction tuning, out-of-domain generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review