The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.
HTML papers on arXiv -- why it is important, and how we made it happen
Open accessAbstract
In October 2023, arXiv made HTML formatted papers available to readers. This was the exciting outcome of over a year of accessibility research and development with the scientific community. Currently, only 2.4% of research outputs meet accessibility guidelines. Informed by scientists who rely on assistive technology, our analysis demonstrates that offering HTML is the most impactful step arXiv can take. Scientists need HTML now, and emphasize to not let perfect be the enemy of good enough. In this paper we share with you how arXiv is achieving HTML conversions from LaTeX now, and our plans for future improvements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Notably, Frankston et al. [8] observed that working directly from the source documents provided a superior starting point compared to PDFs, which is why platforms like ar5iv and the ACM Digital Library directly convert source fi les into accessible HTML.”
From iTagPDF: Towards Finally Automating PDF Accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- B. Beeton, K. Berry, and D. Walden. "TeX: A Branch of Desktop Publishing Evolution, Part 1". In: IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 40.03 (July 2018), pp. 78-93. issn: 1934-1547. doi: 10.1109/MAHC.2018.033841114. · DOI
- B. Beeton, K. Berry, and D. Walden. "TeX: A Branch of Desktop Publishing Evolution, Part 2". In: IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 41.02 (Apr. 2019), pp. 29-41. issn: 1934-1547. doi: 10.1109/MAHC.2019.2893731. · DOI
- Jeffrey P. Bigham et al. "An Uninteresting Tour Through Why Our Research Papers Aren't Ac- cessible". In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Available at https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892588. 2016. · DOI · Paper page
- Shamsi Brinn et al. A framework for improving the accessibility of research papers on arXiv.org. 2022. arXiv: 2212.07286 [cs.DL]. · arXiv
- Donald E. Knuth. Computers & Typesetting. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Com- pany, 1984-1986.
- Leslie Lamport. LaTeX: A Document Praparation System. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub- lishing Company, 1986.
- Frank Mittelbach. "L A T E X anniversaries -A look into two direction". In: TUGboat 44.1 (2023), pp. 77-86. doi: 10.47397/tb/44-1/tb136mitt-history. · DOI
- Lucy Lu Wang et al. Improving the Accessibility of Scientific Documents: Current State, User Needs, and a System Solution to Enhance Scientific PDF Accessibility for Blind and Low Vision Users. 2021. arXiv: 2105.00076 [cs.DL]. · arXiv
Metadata
- Authors
- Frankston, C., Godfrey, J., Brinn, S., Hofer, A., & Nazzaro, M.
- Affiliations
- Massey University (NZ)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2402.08954
- OpenAlex
- W4391835635
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2311521)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- HTML conversion, arXiv, accessibility, assistive technology, LaTeX, scholarly publishing, web accessibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HTML papers on arXiv -- why it is important, and how we made it happen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2402.08954
- The paper
- Frankston, C., Godfrey, J., Brinn, S., Hofer, A., & Nazzaro, M. (2024). HTML papers on arXiv -- why it is important, and how we made it happen. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2402.08954
