Alpha-GPT 2.0: Human-in-the-Loop AI for Quantitative Investment
Open accessAbstract
Recently, we introduced a new paradigm for alpha mining in the realm of quantitative investment, developing a new interactive alpha mining system framework, Alpha-GPT. This system is centered on iterative Human-AI interaction based on large language models, introducing a Human-in-the-Loop approach to alpha discovery. In this paper, we present the next-generation Alpha-GPT 2.0 \footnote{Draft. Work in progress}, a quantitative investment framework that further encompasses crucial modeling and analysis phases in quantitative investment. This framework emphasizes the iterative, interactive research between humans and AI, embodying a Human-in-the-Loop strategy throughout the entire quantitative investment pipeline. By assimilating the insights of human researchers into the systematic alpha research process, we effectively leverage the Human-in-the-Loop approach, enhancing the efficiency and precision of quantitative investment research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Yuan et al. developed Alpha-GPT 2.0, a human-in-the-loop system for quantitative investment that combines language model capabilities with human trader expertise to generate and refine investment strategies.
“Yuan et al. developed Alpha-GPT 2.0, a human-in-the-loop system for quantitative investment that combines language model capabilities with human trader expertise to generate and refine investment strategies [51].”
From Human-in-the-Loop Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Methods, and Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Igor Tulchinsky. Introduction to Alpha Design. In Finding Alphas, pages 1-6.
- Zura Kakushadze. 101 Formulaic Alphas. arXiv:1601.00991 [q-fin], March 2016. arXiv: 1601.00991. · arXiv
- Zhao-Rong Lai and Haisheng Yang. A Survey on Gaps between Mean-Variance Approach and Exponential Growth Rate Approach for Portfolio Optimization. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(2):25:1-25:36, 2022.
- Shuo Yu, Hongyan Xue, Xiang Ao, Feiyang Pan, Jia He, Dandan Tu, and Qing He. Generating Synergistic Formulaic Alpha Collections via Reinforcement Learning, May 2023. arXiv:2306.12964 [cs, q-fin]. · arXiv
- Tianping Zhang, Yuanqi Li, Yifei Jin, and Jian Li. AutoAlpha: an Efficient Hierarchi- cal Evolutionary Algorithm for Mining Alpha Factors in Quantitative Investment, April 2020. arXiv:2002.08245 [q-fin]. · arXiv
- Saizhuo Wang, Hang Yuan, Leon Zhou, Lionel M. Ni, Heung-Yeung Shum, and Jian Guo. Alpha-GPT: Human-AI Interactive Alpha Mining for Quantitative Investment, July 2023. arXiv:2308.00016 [cs, q-fin]. · arXiv
- Authors
- Yuan, H., Wang, S., & Guo, J.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- arXiv
- 2402.09746
- OpenAlex
- W4391912539
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
- Keywords
- human-in-the-loop, quantitative investment, large language models, human-AI interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
