Algebraic description of complex conjugation on cohomology of a smooth projective hypersurface
Open accessAbstract
We describe complex conjugation on the primitive middle-dimensional algebraic de Rham cohomology of a smooth projective hypersurface defined over a number field that admits a real embedding. We use Griffiths' description of the cohomology in terms of a Jacobian ring. The resulting description is algebraic up to transcendental factors explicitly given by certain periods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
[73]'s withdrawal note suggests that a hidden assumption on Hodge numbers was accidentally introduced in the early set-up of section 2.2, making Theorem 2.3 only valid under the additional assumption.
“The authors' withdrawal note on arXiv suggests that a hidden assumption on Hodge numbers was accidentally introduced in the early set-up of section 2.2, thus making Theorem 2.3 only valid under the additional assumption.”
From When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Research (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
- Authors
- Park, J., Park, J., & Yoo, P.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2402.14546
- OpenAlex
- W4392120876
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Algebra and Geometry
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometry and complex manifolds
- Keywords
- complex conjugation, algebraic de Rham cohomology, period, number fields, algebraic cycles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
