Crimson: Empowering Strategic Reasoning in Cybersecurity through Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
We introduces Crimson, a system that enhances the strategic reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) within the realm of cybersecurity. By correlating CVEs with MITRE ATT&CK techniques, Crimson advances threat anticipation and strategic defense efforts. Our approach includes defining and evaluating cybersecurity strategic tasks, alongside implementing a comprehensive human-in-the-loop data-synthetic workflow to develop the CVE-to-ATT&CK Mapping (CVEM) dataset. We further enhance LLMs' reasoning abilities through a novel Retrieval-Aware Training (RAT) process and its refined iteration, RAT-R. Our findings demonstrate that an LLM fine-tuned with our techniques, possessing 7 billion parameters, approaches the performance level of GPT-4, showing markedly lower rates of hallucination and errors, and surpassing other models in strategic reasoning tasks. Moreover, domain-specific fine-tuning of embedding models significantly improves performance within cybersecurity contexts, underscoring the efficacy of our methodology. By leveraging Crimson to convert raw vulnerability data into structured and actionable insights, we bolster proactive cybersecurity defenses.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Crimson enhances the models' interpretability and strategic consistency, providing a proactive approach to cybersecurity threat intelligence.
“By integrating real-time data retrieval and domain-specific fine-tuning, Crimson enhances the models' interpretability and strategic consistency, providing a proactive approach to cybersecurity threat intelligence.”
From When LLMs meet cybersecurity: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Jin et al. 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang (Shane) Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
- Yao Fu, Hao Peng, Ashish Sabharwal, Peter Clark, and Tushar Khot. Complexity-based prompting for multi-step reasoning. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, 2023.
- Peter Mell, Karen Scarfone, and Sasha Romanosky. Common vulnera- bility scoring system. IEEE Security & Privacy, 4(6):85-89, 2007.
- Paulo MMR Alves, PR Geraldo Filho, and Vinícius P Gonçalves. Lever- aging bert's power to classify ttp from unstructured text. In 2022 Work- shop on Communication Networks and Power Systems (WCNPS), pages 1-7. IEEE, 2022.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When LLMs meet cybersecurity: a systematic literature review
Zhang, J., Bu, H., Wen, H., Liu, Y., Fei, H., Xi, R., Li, L., Yang, Y., Zhu, H., & Meng, D. (2025) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-025-00361-w · Cited by 220 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jin, J., Tang, B., Ma, M., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Lai, Q., Yang, J., & Zhou, C.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- National University of Defense Technology (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 18-24
- arXiv
- 2403.00878
- OpenAlex
- W4408862660
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Conference on Computer, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (ICCBD+AI) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- large language models, strategic reasoning, cybersecurity, MITRE ATT&CK, threat prediction, hallucination mitigation, domain-specific embeddings, vulnerability data, proactive defense
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
