Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models with Self-Synthesized Rehearsal
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) suffer from catastrophic forgetting during continual learning. Conventional rehearsal-based methods rely on previous training data to retain the model's ability, which may not be feasible in real-world applications. When conducting continual learning based on a publicly-released LLM checkpoint, the availability of the original training data may be non-existent. To address this challenge, we propose a framework called Self-Synthesized Rehearsal (SSR) that uses the LLM to generate synthetic instances for rehearsal. Concretely, we first employ the base LLM for in-context learning to generate synthetic instances. Subsequently, we utilize the latest LLM to refine the instance outputs based on the synthetic inputs, preserving its acquired ability. Finally, we select diverse high-quality synthetic instances for rehearsal in future stages. Experimental results demonstrate that SSR achieves superior or comparable performance compared to conventional rehearsal-based approaches while being more data-efficient. Besides, SSR effectively preserves the generalization capabilities of LLMs in general domains.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Continual fine-tuning suffers from catastrophic forgetting, where previously learned knowledge is lost as new data is introduced.
“continual fine-tuning suffers from catastrophic forgetting (Huang et al., 2024), where previously learned knowledge is lost as new data is introduced.”
From From RAG to Memory: Non-Parametric Continual Learning for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Xuxin Cheng, Zhihong Zhu, Wanshi Xu, Yaowei Li, Hongxiang Li, and Yuexian Zou. 2023. Accelerating multiple intent detection and slot filling via targeted knowledge distillation. In Findings of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 8900-8910, Singapore. Association for Com- putational Linguistics. · DOI
- Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Sebastian Ruder, Ling- peng Kong, and Dani Yogatama. 2019. Episodic memory in lifelong language learning. In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32.
- Tianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, and Danqi Chen. 2021. SimCSE: Simple contrastive learning of sentence em- beddings. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing, pages 6894-6910, Online and Punta Cana, Do- minican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Jianheng Huang, Ante Wang, Linfeng Gao, Linfeng Song, and Jinsong Su. 2024. Response enhanced semi-supervised dialogue query generation. In Pro- ceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, volume 38, pages 18307-18315. · DOI
- James Kirkpatrick, Razvan Pascanu, Neil Rabinowitz, Joel Veness, Guillaume Desjardins, Andrei A. Rusu, Kieran Milan, John Quan, Tiago Ramalho, Ag- nieszka Grabska-Barwinska, Demis Hassabis, Clau- dia Clopath, Dharshan Kumaran, and Raia Hadsell. 2017. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(13):3521-3526. · DOI · Paper page
- Dingcheng Li, Zheng Chen, Eunah Cho, Jie Hao, Xi- aohu Liu, Fan Xing, Chenlei Guo, and Yang Liu. 2022. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting during domain adaptation of seq2seq language generation. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 5441-5454, Seattle, United States. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. ROUGE: A package for auto- matic evaluation of summaries. In Text Summariza- tion Branches Out, pages 74-81, Barcelona, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- David Lopez-Paz and Marc'Aurelio Ranzato. 2017. Gradient episodic memory for continual learning. Ad- vances in neural information processing systems, 30.
- Zhongjian Miao, Wen Zhang, Jinsong Su, Xiang Li, Jian Luan, Yidong Chen, Bin Wang, and Min Zhang. 2023. Exploring all-in-one knowledge distillation frame- work for neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Nat- ural Language Processing, pages 2929-2940, Singa- pore. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Jisoo Mok, Jaeyoung Do, Sungjin Lee, Tara Taghavi, Seunghak Yu, and Sungroh Yoon. 2023. Large-scale lifelong learning of in-context instructions and how to tackle it. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol- ume 1: Long Papers), pages 12573-12589, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Thomas Scialom, Tuhin Chakrabarty, and Smaranda Muresan. 2022. Fine-tuned language models are continual learners. In Proceedings of the 2022 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6107-6122, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. · DOI
- Yizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormo- labashi, Yeganeh Kordi, Amirreza Mirzaei, Atharva Naik, Arjun Ashok, Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran, Anjana Arunkumar, David Stap, Eshaan Pathak, Giannis Karamanolakis, Haizhi Lai, Ishan Puro- hit, Ishani Mondal, Jacob Anderson, Kirby Kuznia, Krima Doshi, Kuntal Kumar Pal, Maitreya Patel, Mehrad Moradshahi, Mihir Parmar, Mirali Purohit, Neeraj Varshney, Phani Rohitha Kaza, Pulkit Verma, Ravsehaj Singh Puri, Rushang Karia, Savan Doshi, Shailaja Keyur Sampat, Siddhartha Mishra, Sujan Reddy A, Sumanta Patro, Tanay Dixit, and Xudong Shen. 2022. Super-NaturalInstructions: Generaliza- tion via declarative instructions on 1600+ NLP tasks. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empiri- cal Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5085-5109, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Han Zhang, Sheng Zhang, Yang Xiang, Bin Liang, Jin- song Su, Zhongjian Miao, Hui Wang, and Ruifeng Xu. 2022. CLLE: A benchmark for continual lan- guage learning evaluation in multilingual machine translation. In Findings of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, pages 428- 443, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Liang Zhang, Jinsong Su, Zijun Min, Zhongjian Miao, Qingguo Hu, Biao Fu, Xiaodong Shi, and Yidong Chen. 2023a. Exploring self-distillation based rela- tional reasoning training for document-level relation extraction. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 13967- 13975. · DOI
- Zihan Zhang, Meng Fang, Ling Chen, and Mohammad- Reza Namazi-Rad. 2023b. CITB: A benchmark for continual instruction tuning. In Findings of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 9443-9455, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Emerged Security and Privacy of LLM Agent: A Survey with Case Studies
He, F., Zhu, T., Ye, D., Liu, B., Zhou, W., & Yu, P. S. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3773080 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
From RAG to Memory: Non-Parametric Continual Learning for Large Language Models
Gutiérrez, B. J., Shu, Y., Qi, W., Zhou, S., & Su, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.14802 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“We randomly collect 1 , 000 queries from the NaturalQuestions (NQ) dataset (collected by Wang et al. (2024)), which contains real user questions with a wide range of topics.”
- Authors
- Huang, J., Cui, L., Wang, A., Yang, C., Liao, X., Song, L., Yao, J., & Su, J.
- Affiliations
- Tencent (China) (CN)
- Xiamen University (CN)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2403.01244
- OpenAlex
- W4392487568
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (3502Z20231043, 62276219)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- catastrophic forgetting, large language models, continual learning, synthetic data generation, in-context learning, data efficiency, generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review