PreprintCited by 16Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFace recognition and analysis3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Stable-Makeup: When Real-World Makeup Transfer Meets Diffusion Model

Open access
Zhang, Yuxuan, Yuan, Yirui, Song, Yiren, Liu, Jiaming·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Current makeup transfer methods are limited to simple makeup styles, making them difficult to apply in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we introduce Stable-Makeup, a novel diffusion-based makeup transfer method capable of robustly transferring a wide range of real-world makeup, onto user-provided faces. Stable-Makeup is based on a pre-trained diffusion model and utilizes a Detail-Preserving (D-P) makeup encoder to encode makeup details. It also employs content and structural control modules to preserve the content and structural information of the source image. With the aid of our newly added makeup cross-attention layers in U-Net, we can accurately transfer the detailed makeup to the corresponding position in the source image. After content-structure decoupling training, Stable-Makeup can maintain content and the facial structure of the source image. Moreover, our method has demonstrated strong robustness and generalizability, making it applicable to varioustasks such as cross-domain makeup transfer, makeup-guided text-to-image generation and so on. Extensive experiments have demonstrated that our approach delivers state-of-the-art (SOTA) results among existing makeup transfer methods and exhibits a highly promising with broad potential applications in various related fields. Code released: https://github.com/Xiaojiu-z/Stable-Makeup

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2403.07764

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Features in the U-Net's self-attention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.

    “It is well known that the features in the U-Net's selfattention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.”

    From DiffSim: Taming Diffusion Models for Evaluating Visual Similarity (2024) · cites this paper as [61]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Yuan, Y., Song, Y., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • ShanghaiTech University (CN)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Pages
1-9
OpenAlex
W4412588161
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7
FWCI
12.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
makeup transfer, diffusion models, image-to-image translation, Stable Diffusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review