PreprintCited by 129Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningTopic ModelingAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Survey

Open access
Han, Zeyu, Gao, Chao, Liu, Jinyang, Zhang, Jeff, Zhang, Sai Qian·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Large models represent a groundbreaking advancement in multiple application fields, enabling remarkable achievements across various tasks. However, their unprecedented scale comes with significant computational costs. These models, often consisting of billions of parameters, require vast amounts of computational resources for execution. Especially, the expansive scale and computational demands pose considerable challenges when customizing them for particular downstream tasks, particularly over the hardware platforms constrained by computational capabilities. Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) provides a practical solution by efficiently adjusting the large models over the various downstream tasks. In particular, PEFT refers to the process of adjusting the parameters of a pre-trained large model to adapt it to a specific task or domain while minimizing the number of additional parameters introduced or computational resources required. This approach is particularly important when dealing with large-scale language models with high parameter counts, as fine-tuning these models from scratch can be computationally expensive and resource-intensive, posing considerable challenges in the supporting system platform design. In this survey, we present comprehensive studies of various PEFT algorithms, examining their performance and computational overhead. Moreover, we provide an overview of applications developed using different PEFT algorithms and discuss common techniques employed to mitigate computation costs for PEFT. In addition to providing an extensive survey from an algorithmic standpoint, we also examine various real-world system designs to investigate the implementation costs associated with different PEFT approaches. This survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers aiming to understand both the PEFT algorithm and its system implementation, offering detailed ......

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2403.14608

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personal parametric long-term memory utilizes personalized Knowledge Editing technology, such as Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT), to encode personal data into the LLM's parameters in a parametric manner, thereby facilitating the long-term, parameterized storage of memory.

    “Personal parametric long-term memory utilizes personalized Knowledge Editing technology [92], such as Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) [93], to encode personal data into the LLM's parameters in a parametric manner, thereby facilitating the long-term, parameterized storage of memory.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 129

Authors
Han, Z., Gao, C., Liu, J., Zhang, J., & Zhang, S. Q.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393138529
Cited by
129
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 36
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
parameter-efficient fine-tuning, large language models, computational complexity reduction, hardware constraints, domain adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review