PreprintCited by 5Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Developing and Deploying Industry Standards for Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED): Challenges, Strategies, and Future Directions

Open access

Abstract

The adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) holds the promise of revolutionizing educational practices by offering personalized learning experiences, automating administrative and pedagogical tasks, and reducing the cost of content creation. However, the lack of standardized practices in the development and deployment of AIED solutions has led to fragmented ecosystems, which presents challenges in interoperability, scalability, and ethical governance. This article aims to address the critical need to develop and implement industry standards in AIED, offering a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape, challenges, and strategic approaches to overcome these obstacles. We begin by examining the various applications of AIED in various educational settings and identify key areas lacking in standardization, including system interoperability, ontology mapping, data integration, evaluation, and ethical governance. Then, we propose a multi-tiered framework for establishing robust industry standards for AIED. In addition, we discuss methodologies for the iterative development and deployment of standards, incorporating feedback loops from real-world applications to refine and adapt standards over time. The paper also highlights the role of emerging technologies and pedagogical theories in shaping future standards for AIED. Finally, we outline a strategic roadmap for stakeholders to implement these standards, fostering a cohesive and ethical AIED ecosystem. By establishing comprehensive industry standards, such as those by IEEE Artificial Intelligence Standards Committee (AISC) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO), we can accelerate and scale AIED solutions to improve educational outcomes, ensuring that technological advances align with the principles of inclusivity, fairness, and educational excellence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2403.14689

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 5

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. IEEE: The IEEE global initiative on ethics of autonomous and intelligent sys- tems. ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems, first edition. Tech. rep., IEEE Standards Association (2019), https://standards.ieee.org/content/ieee-standards/en/ industry-connections/ec/
  2. Li, H., Xu, T., Zhang, C., Chen, E., Liang, J., Fan, X., Li, H., Tang, J., Wen, Q.: Bringing generative AI to adaptive learning in education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14601 (2024) · arXiv
  3. Tong, J.R., Lee, T.X.: Trustworthy ai that engages humans as part- ners in teaching and learning. Computer 56(05), 62-73 (may 2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3234517 · DOI
  4. Tong, R., Rowe, J., Goldberg, B.: Architecture Implications for Building Macro and Micro Level Self-Improving AISs. In: Sinatra, A.M., Graesser, A.C., Hu, X., Brawner, K., Rus, V. (eds.) Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Sys- tems: Volume 7 -Self-Improving System, chap. 3. US Army Research Laboratory, Human Research & Engineering Directorate, Orlando, Florida (2019)

Metadata

Authors
Tong, R., Li, H., Liang, J., & Wen, Q.
Affiliations
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393211928
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, industry standards, standardization, interoperability, ontology mapping, data integration, ethical governance, ISO standards, personalized learning, scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review