The DOI matches its DataCite record.
From Guidelines to Governance: A Study of AI Policies in Education
Open accessAbstract
Emerging technologies like generative AI tools, including ChatGPT, are increasingly utilized in educational settings, offering innovative approaches to learning while simultaneously posing new challenges. This study employs a survey methodology to examine the policy landscape concerning these technologies, drawing insights from 102 high school principals and higher education provosts. Our results reveal a prominent policy gap: the majority of institutions lack specialized guide-lines for the ethical deployment of AI tools such as ChatGPT. Moreover,we observed that high schools are less inclined to work on policies than higher educational institutions. Where such policies do exist, they often overlook crucial issues, including student privacy and algorithmic transparency. Administrators overwhelmingly recognize the necessity of these policies, primarily to safeguard student safety and mitigate plagiarism risks. Our findings underscore the urgent need for flexible and iterative policy frameworks in educational contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In response, HE officials have begun to develop policies and resources that address the use of GenAI tools [1, 3-5, 26, 45].”
From "I'd Never Actually Realized How Big An Impact It Had Until Now": Perspectives of University Students with Disabilities on Generative Artificial Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In line with fi ndings from Barrett and Pack [15] and Ghimire and Edwards [45], a recurring theme in our work was the variability in the presence and clarity of course AI policies.”
From "I'd Never Actually Realized How Big An Impact It Had Until Now": Perspectives of University Students with Disabilities on Generative Artificial Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In a survey by Ghimire and Edwards [45] that included 21 provosts and academic officers at HE institutions from across the United States, nearly 80% of officials reported that their institutions were currently developing an AI policy.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., Rockwell, G.: Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in k-12 education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 4, 100131 (2023)
- Akgun, S., Greenhow, C.: Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in k-12 settings. AI and Ethics pp. 1-10 (2021)
- Ali, S., DiPaola, D., Williams, R., Ravi, P., Breazeal, C.: Constructing dreams using generative ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12013 (2023) · arXiv
- Baidoo-Anu, D., Ansah, L.O.: Education in the era of generative artificial intelli- gence (ai): Understanding the potential benefits of chatgpt in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI 7(1), 52-62 (2023)
- Berendt, B., Littlejohn, A., Blakemore, M.: Ai in education: Learner choice and fundamental rights. Learning, Media and Technology 45(3), 312-324 (2020)
- Chan, C.K.Y.: A comprehensive ai policy education framework for university teach- ing and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Edu- cation 20(1), 1-25 (2023)
- Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., Liu, C.: Two decades of artificial intelligence in education. Educational Technology & Society 25(1), 28-47 (2022)
- Chiu, T.K.: The impact of generative ai (genai) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of chatgpt and midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments pp. 1-17 (2023)
- Choi, J.H., Hickman, K.E., Monahan, A., Schwarcz, D.: Chatgpt goes to law school. Available at SSRN (2023)
- Dwivedi, Y.K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E.L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A.K., Baab- dullah, A.M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., et al.: "so what if chatgpt wrote it?" multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implica- tions of generative conversational ai for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management 71, 102642 (2023)
- Flogie, A., Krabonja, M.V.: Artificial intelligence in education: developing compe- tencies and supporting teachers in implementing ai in school learning environments. In: 2023 12th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO). pp. 1- 6. IEEE (2023)
- Garshi, A., Jakobsen, M.W., Nyborg-Christensen, J., Ostnes, D., Ovchinnikova, M.: Smart technology in the classroom: a systematic review. prospects for algo- rithmic accountability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.06374 (2020) · arXiv
- Gillani, N., Eynon, R., Chiabaut, C., Finkel, K.: Unpacking the "black box" of ai in education. Educational Technology & Society 26(1), 99-111 (2023)
- Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S.B., Santos, O.C., Rodrigo, M.T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I.I., et al.: Ethics of ai in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education pp. 1-23 (2021)
- Kooli, C.: Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability 15(7), 5614 (2023)
- Li, S., Gu, X.: A risk framework for human-centered artificial intelligence in edu- cation. Educational Technology & Society 26(1), 187-202 (2023)
- Lo, C.K.: What is the impact of chatgpt on education? a rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences 13(4), 410 (2023)
- Memarian, B., Doleck, T.: Fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (fate) in artificial intelligence (ai), and higher education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence p. 100152 (2023)
- Nguyen, A., Ngo, H.N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., Nguyen, B.P.T.: Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies 28(4), 4221-4241 (2023)
- Nigam, A., Pasricha, R., Singh, T., Churi, P.: A systematic review on ai-based proc- toring systems: Past, present and future. Education and Information Technologies 26(5), 6421-6445 (2021)
- Ouyang, F., Jiao, P.: Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2, 100020 (2021)
- Pradana, M., Elisa, H.P., Syarifuddin, S.: Discussing chatgpt in education: A lit- erature review and bibliometric analysis. Cogent Education 10(2), 2243134 (2023)
- Sahlgren, O.: The politics and reciprocal (re) configuration of accountability and fairness in data-driven education. Learning, Media and Technology 48(1), 95-108 (2023)
- Sattelmaier, L., Pawlowski, J.M.: Towards a generative artificial intelligence com- petence framework for schools. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Enterprise and Industrial Systems (ICOEINS 2023). vol. 270, p. 291. Springer Nature (2023)
- Uunona, G.N., Goosen, L.: Leveraging ethical standards in artificial intelligence technologies: A guideline for responsible teaching and learning applications. In: Handbook of Research on Instructional Technologies in Health Education and Al- lied Disciplines, pp. 310-330. IGI Global (2023)
- Whalen, J., Mouza, C., et al.: Chatgpt: Challenges, opportunities, and implications for teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 23(1), 1-23 (2023)
- Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C.S., Jong, M.S.Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.B., Yuan, J., Li, Y.: A review of artificial intelligence (ai) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity 2021, 1-18 (2021)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Atcheson, A., Khan, O., Siemann, B., Jain, A., & Karahalios, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714121 · Cited by 22
Tao, Y., Ryan, M., Bialy, F., & Zhang, X. (2026) · Research Square (preprint) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10029667/v1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghimire, A., & Edwards, J.
- Affiliations
- Utah State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ghimire, Aashish
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 299-307
- ISSN
- 1865-0929 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2403.15601
- OpenAlex
- W4400207467
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 10
- FWCI
- 37.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Communications in computer and information science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- generative AI in education, AI policy, ChatGPT, school administrators, higher education governance, policy gaps, student privacy, algorithmic transparency, plagiarism, student safety, AI ethics guidelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
