The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CodeShell Technical Report
Open accessAbstract
Code large language models mark a pivotal breakthrough in artificial intelligence. They are specifically crafted to understand and generate programming languages, significantly boosting the efficiency of coding development workflows. In this technical report, we present CodeShell-Base, a seven billion-parameter foundation model with 8K context length, showcasing exceptional proficiency in code comprehension. By incorporating Grouped-Query Attention and Rotary Positional Embedding into GPT-2, CodeShell-Base integrates the structural merits of StarCoder and CodeLlama and forms its unique architectural design. We then carefully built a comprehensive data pre-processing process, including similar data deduplication, perplexity-based data filtering, and model-based data filtering. Through this process, We have curated 100 billion high-quality pre-training data from GitHub. Benefiting from the high-quality data, CodeShell-Base outperforms CodeLlama in Humaneval after training on just 500 billion tokens (5 epochs). We have conducted extensive experiments across multiple language datasets, including Python, Java, and C++, and the results indicate that our model possesses robust foundational capabilities in code comprehension and generation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“it serves as the foundation for derivative LLMs such as WizardCoder [53], OctoPack [59], CodeShell [94], and DeepSeek-Coder [22].”
From LessLeak-Bench: A First Investigation of Data Leakage in LLMs Across 83 Software Engineering Benchmarks (2025) · cites this paper as [94]
In the citing paper
“For instance, CodeShell [94] incorporates StarCoder's pre-training data”
From LessLeak-Bench: A First Investigation of Data Leakage in LLMs Across 83 Software Engineering Benchmarks (2025) · cites this paper as [94]
Citations
Cites
Gunasekar, S., Zhang, Y., Aneja, J., Mendes, C. C. T., Del Giorno, A., Gopi, S., Javaheripi, M., Kauffmann, P., de Rosa, G., Saarikivi, O., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.11644 · Cited by 138
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhou, X., Weyssow, M., Widyasari, R., Zhang, T., He, J., Lyu, Y., Chang, J., Zhang, B., Huang, D., & Lo, D. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.06215 · Cited by 3
McEval: Massively Multilingual Code Evaluation
Chai, L., Liu, S., Yang, J., Yin, Y., Jin, K., Liu, J., Sun, T., Zhang, G., Ren, C., Guo, H., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.07436 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, R., Zeng, Z., Yu, Z., Gao, C., Zhang, S., & Ye, W.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2403.15747
- OpenAlex
- W4393212697
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Keywords
- code large language models, foundation models, program comprehension, code generation, grouped-query attention, rotary positional embeddings, GPT-2, HumanEval, multi-language programming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CodeShell Technical Report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2403.15747
- The paper
- Xie, R., Zeng, Z., Yu, Z., Gao, C., Zhang, S., & Ye, W. (2024). CodeShell Technical Report. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2403.15747
