The DOI matches its DataCite record.
BLADE: Enhancing Black-box Large Language Models with Small Domain-Specific Models
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT-4 are versatile and capable of addressing a diverse range of tasks. However, general LLMs, which are developed on open-domain data, may lack the domain-specific knowledge essential for tasks in vertical domains, such as legal, medical, etc. To address this issue, previous approaches either conduct continuous pre-training with domain-specific data or employ retrieval augmentation to support general LLMs. Unfortunately, these strategies are either cost-intensive or unreliable in practical applications. To this end, we present a novel framework named BLADE, which enhances Black-box LArge language models with small Domain-spEcific models. BLADE consists of a black-box LLM and a small domain-specific LM. The small LM preserves domain-specific knowledge and offers specialized insights, while the general LLM contributes robust language comprehension and reasoning capabilities. Specifically, our method involves three steps: 1) pre-training the small LM with domain-specific data, 2) fine-tuning this model using knowledge instruction data, and 3) joint Bayesian optimization of the general LLM and the small LM. Extensive experiments conducted on public legal and medical benchmarks reveal that BLADE significantly outperforms existing approaches. This shows the potential of BLADE as an effective and cost-efficient solution in adapting general LLMs for vertical domains.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is usually inefficient or prohibitive to update largescale generative AI models such as LLMs with task-oriented external data through model pre-training or supervised fine-tuning (SFT) [81-83].”
From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“While RAG can help LLMs adapt to new domains quickly, their performance is limited when the understanding of input documents from the external corpus requires domain knowledge that the LLMs do not possess in advance [83].”
From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [83]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, F., Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Wu, Z., Mo, T., Lu, Q., Wang, W., Li, R., Xu, J., Tang, X., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3768165 · Cited by 106
Self-citationAi, Q., Zhan, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02842
“It is usually inefficient or prohibitive to update large-scale generative AI models such as LLMs with task-oriented external data through model pre-training or supervised fine-tuning (SFT) [81–83].”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, H., Ai, Q., Chen, J., Dong, Q., Wu, Z., Liu, Y., Chen, C., & Tian, Q.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Xiaohongshu (Little Red Book) (China) (CN)
- Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 24422-24430
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2403.18365
- OpenAlex
- W4409348182
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 12.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- large language models, domain-specific models, question answering, domain adaptation, Bayesian optimization, small language models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review