CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 178Artificial Intelligence in EducationEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

Distributed agency in second language learning and teaching through generative AI

Open access
Godwin-Jones, Robert·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2403.20216arXiv 2403.20216
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Generative AI offers significant opportunities for language learning. Tools like ChatGPT can provide informal second language practice through chats in written or voice forms, with the learner specifying through prompts conversational parameters such as proficiency level, language register, and discussion topics. AI can be instructed to give corrective feedback, create practice exercises, or develop an extended study plan. Instructors can use AI to build learning and assessment materials in a variety of media. AI is likely to make immersive technologies more powerful and versatile, moving away from scripted interactions. For both learners and teachers, it is important to understand the limitations of AI systems that arise from their purely statistical model of human language, which limits their ability to deal with nuanced social and cultural aspects of language use. Additionally, there are ethical concerns over how AI systems are created as well as practical constraints in their use, especially for less privileged populations. The power and versatility of AI tools are likely to turn them into valuable and constant companions in many peoples lives (akin to smartphones), creating a close connection that goes beyond simple tool use. Ecological theories such as sociomaterialism are helpful in examining the shared agency that develops through close user-AI interactions, as are the perspectives on human-object relations from Indigenous cultures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2403.20216

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 111

  1. Ågerfalk, P. J. (2020). Artificial intelligence as digital agency. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2020.1721947 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Information Fusion, 99, Article 101805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Anis, M. (2023). Leveraging artificial intelligence for inclusive English language teaching: Strategies and implications for learner diversity. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 12(6), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt. · DOI
  4. v16n11p68 · DOI
  5. Atari, M., Xue, M. J., Park, P. S., Blasi, D., & Henrich, J. (2023). Which humans? PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/5b26t/
  6. Atkinson, D. (2010). Extended, embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 599-622. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq009 · DOI
  7. Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., & Okada, H. (2018). Language learning great and small: Environmental support structures and learning opportunities in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition/teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 102(3), 471-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12496 · DOI
  8. Baek, C., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. "ChatGPT seems too good to be true": College students' use and perceptions of generative AI. OSFPreprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6tjpk · DOI
  9. Baralt, M., Doscher, S., Boukerrou, L., Bogosian, B., Elmeligi, W., Hdouch, Y., Istifan, J., Nemouch, A., Khachatryan, T., Elsakka, N., Arana, F., Perez, G., Cobos-Solis, J., Mouchane, S.-E., & Vassigh, S. (2022). Virtual Tabadul: Creating language-learning community through virtual reality. Journal of International Students, 12(S3), 168-188. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12is3.4638 · DOI
  10. Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1160-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Benson, P. (2017). Language learning beyond the classroom: Access all areas. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 8(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.37237/080206 · DOI
  12. Blyth, C. (2023, June 8-10). Exploring the affordances of AI tools for L2 creative writing [Conference presentation]. CALICO Annual Conference, Minneapolis.
  13. Bonner, E., Lege, R., & Frazier, E. (2023). Large language model-based artificial intelligence in the language classroom: Practical ideas for teaching. Teaching English with Technology, 23(1), 23- 41. https://doi.org/10.56297/bkam1691/wieo1749 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Boulton, A. (2017). Data-driven learning and language pedagogy. In S. Thorne & S. May (Eds.), Language, Education and Technology: Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp.181-192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_15 · DOI
  15. Buendgens-Kosten, J. (2020). The monolingual problem of computer-assisted language learning. ReCALL, 32(3), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095834402000004x · DOI
  16. Canagarajah, S. (2021). Rethinking mobility and language: From the Global South. The Modern Language Journal, 105(2), 570-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12726 · DOI
  17. Canagarajah, S. (2023). Decolonization as pedagogy: A praxis of 'becoming' in ELT. ELT Journal, 77(3), 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccad017 · DOI
  18. Celik, S. S., & Aydin, S. (2016). Wiki effect on English as a foreign language writing achievement. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(4), 218-227. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v6i4.1674 · DOI
  19. Choi, Y. (2022). The curious case of commonsense intelligence. Daedalus, 151(2), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_01906 · DOI
  20. Darvin, R. (2023). Sociotechnical structures, materialist semiotics, and online language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 28-45. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73502
  21. Dattathrani, S., & De', R. (2023). The concept of agency in the era of artificial intelligence: Dimensions and degrees. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022- 10336-8 · DOI
  22. Dooly, M., & Darvin, R. (2022). Intercultural communicative competence in the digital age: Critical digital literacy and inquiry-based pedagogy. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22(3), 354-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2022.2063304 · DOI
  23. Dunne, R., Morris, T., & Harper, S. (2022). A survey of ambient intelligence. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(4), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447242 · DOI
  24. Eilola, L. E., & Lilja, N. S. (2021). The smartphone as a personal cognitive artifact supporting participation in interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 105(1), 294-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12697 · DOI
  25. Ellis, N. C. (2019). Essentials of a theory of language cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 103(S1), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12532 · DOI
  26. Engman, M. M., & Hermes, M. (2021). Land as interlocutor: A study of Ojibwe learner language in interaction on and with naturally occurring 'materials'. The Modern Language Journal, 105(S1), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12685 · DOI
  27. Enriquez, G., Gill, V., Campano, G., Flores, T. T., Jones, S., Leander, K. M., McKnight, L., & Price- Dennis, D. (2024). Generative AI and composing: An intergenerational conversation among literacy scholars. English Teaching: Practice & Critique. https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-08-2023- 0104 · DOI · Paper page
  28. The "Five Graces Group", Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language learning, 59(s1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9922.2009.00533.x · DOI
  29. Floridi, L. (2023a). AI as agency without intelligence: On ChatGPT, large language models, and other generative models. Philosophy & Technology, 36, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023- 00621-y · DOI · Paper page
  30. Floridi, L. (2023b). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883098.001.0001 · DOI
  31. García, O., & Kleifgen, J. A. (2020). Translanguaging and literacies. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(4), 553-571. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.286 · DOI
  32. García-Pastor, M. D. (2020). Researching identity and L2 pragmatics in digital stories. CALICO Journal, 37(1), 46-65. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/27113780 · DOI
  33. Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Smartphones and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 3-17. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44607
  34. Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Chasing the butterfly effect: Informal language learning online as a complex system. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 8-27. https://doi.org/10125/44643
  35. Godwin-Jones, R. (2019a). In a world of SMART technology, why learn another language? Educational Technology & Society, 22 (2), 4-13. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dZ0gydJh2aLzviY5Z_fkrmCS7rG6rUmq/view
  36. Godwin-Jones, R. (2019b). Telecollaboration as an approach to developing intercultural communication competence. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 8-28. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44691
  37. Godwin-Jones, R. (2020). Building the porous classroom: An expanded model for blended language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 1-18. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44731
  38. Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Big data and language learning: Opportunities and challenges. Language Learning & Technology, 25(1), 4-19. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44747
  39. Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 5-24. http://doi.org/10125/73474
  40. Godwin-Jones, R. (2023a). Emerging spaces for language learning: AI bots, ambient intelligence, and the metaverse. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 6-27. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73501
  41. Godwin-Jones, R. (2023b). Presence and agency in real and virtual spaces: The promise of extended reality for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 27(3), 6-26. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73529
  42. Guerrettaz, A. M., Engman, M. M., & Matsumoto, Y. (2021). Empirically defining language learning and teaching materials in use through sociomaterial perspectives. The Modern Language Journal, 105(S1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12691 · DOI
  43. Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students' argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 54, Article 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Han, Y., & Reinhardt, J. (2022). Autonomy in the Digital Wilds: Agency, Competence, and Self-efficacy in the Development of L2 Digital Identities. Tesol quarterly, 56(3), 985-1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3142 · DOI
  45. Harshitha H. (2023, November 24-26). Conversation Design as a Pedagogical Strategy in ESL Classrooms: Co-creation of a Chatbot by Beginner-level Learners in India [Paper presentation]. AsiaCALL 2023 Conference, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. https://asiacall.info/conference- program/
  46. Hasse, C. (2019). Posthuman learning: AI from novice to expert? AI & Society, 34, 355-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0854-4 · DOI
  47. Hellmich, E., & Vinall, K. (2021). FL instructor beliefs about machine translation: Ecological insights to guide research and practice. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 11(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2021100101 · DOI
  48. Holtgraves, T. M., Ross, S. J., Weywadt, C. R., & Han, T. L. (2007). Perceiving artificial social agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2163-2174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.017 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Jacob, S., Baek, C., & Warschauer, M. (2024). Computational literacy, language, and culture. Proceedings of the IEEE Annual International Conference on Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T95JkGeDyx7haV3qIK6C2rFQdD1uDKg5/view
  50. Jacob, S., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2023). Emergent AI-assisted discourse: Case study of a second language writer authoring with ChatGPT. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.10903 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Jarzabkowski, P., & Pinch, T. (2013). Sociomateriality is 'the New Black': Accomplishing repurposing, reinscripting and repairing in context. M@n@gement, 16(5), 579-592. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.165.0579 · DOI
  52. Jeon, J., Lee, S., & Choe, H. (2023). Beyond ChatGPT: A conceptual framework and systematic review of speech-recognition chatbots for language learning. Computers & Education, 206, Article 104898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104898 · DOI
  53. Jolley, J. R., & Maimone, L. (2022). Thirty years of machine translation in language teaching and learning: A review of the literature. L2 Journal, 14(1), 26-44. https://doi.org/10.5070/l214151760 · DOI
  54. Kern, R. (2018). Five principles of a relational pedagogy: Integrating social, individual, and material dimensions of language use. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 9(2), 1-14. http://www.tclt.us/journal/2018v9n2/kern.pdf
  55. King, B. W. (2015). Wikipedia writing as praxis: Computer-mediated socialization of second-language writers. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 106-123. http://dx.doi.org/10125/444
  56. Klimanova, L. (2021). The evolution of identity research in CALL: From scripted chatrooms to engaged construction of the digital self. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 186-204. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73455
  57. Klimanova, L., & Lomicka, L. (2023). Semiotics in CALL: Signs, meanings and multimodality in digital spaces. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 1-5. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73500
  58. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Kosinski, M. (2023).Evaluating large language models in theory of mind tasks. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.02083 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and Culture. Oxford University Press.
  61. Lan, Y.-J., & Chen, N.-S. (2024). Teachers' agency in the era of LLM and generative AI: Designing pedagogical AI agents. Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), i-xviii. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202401_27(1).PP01 · DOI
  62. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Leaver, B. L., Davidson, D. E., & Campbell, C. (Eds.). (2021). Transformative language learning and teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108870788 · DOI
  64. Lee, H. & Lee, J. H. (2024). The effects of AI-Guided individualized language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2). 131-159. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73575
  65. Lenat, D. B. (1995). CYC: A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219745 · DOI
  66. Levine, G. (2020). A human ecological language pedagogy. Modern Language Journal, 104(S1), 1-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12608 · DOI
  67. Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023). GPT detectors are biased against non- native English writers. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02819 · arXiv
  68. Liu, C., Hou, J., Tu, Y. F., Wang, Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Incorporating a reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence-supported English writing environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2012812 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Liu, F., Jiang, Y., Lai, C., Jin, T. (2024). Teacher engagement with automated text simplification for differentiated instruction. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2). 160-179. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73576
  70. McConachy, T. (2019). L2 pragmatics as 'intercultural pragmatics': Probing sociopragmatic aspects of pragmatic awareness. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.014 · DOI
  71. McKnight, L. (2021). Electric sheep? Humans, robots, artificial intelligence, and the future of writing. Changing English, 28(4), 442-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684x.2021.1941768 · DOI · Paper page
  72. McKnight, L., & Shipp, C. (2024). "Just a tool"? Troubling language and power in generative AI writing. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 23(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-08- 2023-0092 · DOI
  73. Mills, N., Courtney, M., Dede, C., Dressen, A., & Gant, R. (2020). Culture and vision in virtual reality narratives. Foreign Language Annals, 53(4), 733-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12494 · DOI
  74. Moorhouse, B. L. (2024). Beginning and first-year language teachers' readiness for the generative AI age. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100201 · DOI
  75. Morris, M.R., Sohl-dickstein, J., Fiedel, N., Warkentin, T., Dafoe, A., Faust, A., Farabet, C. & Legg, S. (2024). Levels of AGI: Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02462 · arXiv
  76. Mosqueira-Rey, E., Hernández-Pereira, E., Alonso-Ríos, D., Bobes-Bascarán, J., & Fernández-Leal, Á. (2023). Human-in-the-loop machine learning: A state of the art. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56, 3005-3054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10246-w · DOI
  77. Ortega, L. (2017). New CALL-SLA research interfaces for the 21st century: Towards equitable multilingualism. CALICO Journal, 34(3), 285-316. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.33855 · DOI
  78. Ortega, L. (2019). SLA and the study of equitable multilingualism. The Modern Language Journal, 103(S1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12525 · DOI
  79. Patil, D. D., Dhotre, D. R., Gawande, G. S., Mate, D. S., Shelke, M. V., & Bhoye, T. S. (2024). Transformative trends in generative AI: Harnessing large language models for natural language understanding and generation. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(4s), 309-319. https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/3794
  80. Peng, H., Jager, S., & Lowie, W. (2022). A person-centred approach to L2 learners' informal mobile language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2148-2169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868532 · DOI
  81. Pennycook, A. (2020). Critical and posthumanist applied linguistics. In V. J. Zacchi & C. H. Rocha (Eds.), Diversidade e tecnologias no ensino de línguas (pp. 179-198). Blucher Open Access. https://doi.org/10.5151/9786555060560-09 · DOI
  82. Piantadosi, S. (2023). Modern language models refute Chomsky's approach to language. Lingbuzz Preprint (v. 1). https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/007180
  83. Ramesh, K., Sitaram, S., & Choudhury, M. (2023). Fairness in language models beyond English: Gaps and challenges. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.157 · DOI
  84. Ranalli, J. (2021). L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, Article 100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Rowe, L. W. (2022). Google Translate and biliterate composing: Second-graders' use of digital translation tools to support bilingual writing. TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 883-906. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3143 · DOI
  86. Ryan, M., & Kautzman, K. (Eds.). (2022). Beyond the Traditional Essay: Increasing Student Agency in a Diverse Classroom with Nondisposable Assignments. Vernon Press.
  87. Satar, M., Hauck, M., & Bilki, Z. (2023). Multimodal representation in virtual exchange: A social semiotic approach to critical digital literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 72-96. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73504
  88. Sauro, S. (2016). Does CALL have an English problem? Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44474
  89. Sauro, S. (2017). Fandom and online interest groups. In S. L. Thorne & S. May (Eds.), Language, Education, and Technology (pp. 131-142). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02237- 6_10 · DOI
  90. Schmidt, T., & Strasser, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence in foreign language learning and teaching: A CALL for intelligent practice. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 33(1), 165- 184. https://doi.org/10.33675/angl/2022/1/14 · DOI
  91. Sockett, G. (2014). The online informal learning of English. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414885 · DOI
  92. Su, D., & Goslar, K. (2023, October 19-21). Evaluating pragmatic competence of Artificial Intelligence with the Lens concept: ChatGPT-4 for Chinese L2 teaching [Conference presentation abstract]. 20th Annual Technology for Second Language Learning Conference, Ames, IA, United States. https://apling.engl.iastate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/221/2023/10/TSLL-2023-Program- Book.pdf
  93. Thorne, S. L., Hellermann, J., & Jakonen, T. (2021). Rewilding language education: Emergent assemblages and entangled actions. The Modern Language Journal, 105(S1), 106-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12687 · DOI
  94. Thorne, S. L., & Tasker, T. (2011). Sociocultural and cultural-historical theories of language development. In J. Simpson (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 487-500). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203835654. · DOI
  95. ch34 · DOI
  96. Toohey, K., & Smythe, S. (2022). A different difference in teacher education: Posthuman and decolonizing perspectives. Language and Education, 36(2), 122-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1980002 · DOI
  97. Tseng, W., & Warschauer, M. (2023). AI-writing tools in education: If you can't beat them, join them. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 3(2), 258-262. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0008 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Van Lier, L. (2010). The ecology of language learning: Practice to theory, theory to practice. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.005 · DOI
  99. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 1-11 (v.
  100. Vinall, K., & Hellmich, E. (2022). Do you speak translate?: Reflections on the nature and role of translation. L2 Journal, 14(1), 4-25. https://doi.org/10.5070/l214156150 · DOI
  101. Wang, J., Liu, Y., & Wang, X. E. (2021). Assessing multilingual fairness in pre-trained multimodal representations. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.06683 · arXiv
  102. Wang, S., & Chan, M. (2023, November 23-26). Harnessing customized ChatGPT for enhanced language learning. [Conference presentation]. AsiaCALL Conference, DaNang, Vietnam. https://www.canva.com/design/DAFz3swxC1E/GJf0R89-mhr8JgNKsZ_Mew/view
  103. Wang, X., Liu, Q., Pang, H., Tan, S. C., Lei, J., Wallace, M. P., & Li, L. (2023). What matters in AI- supported learning: A study of human-AI interactions in language learning using cluster analysis and epistemic network analysis. Computers & Education, 194, Article 104703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104703 · DOI
  104. Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023). The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, Article 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071 · DOI
  105. Warschauer, M., & Tate, T. (2017). Digital divides and social inclusion. In K. A. Mills, A. Stornaiuolo, A. Smith, & J. Z. Pandya (Eds.), Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures (pp. 63-75). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315465258-8 · DOI
  106. Warschauer, M., Yim, S., Lee, H., & Zheng, B. (2019). Recent contributions of data mining to language learning research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190519000023 · DOI
  107. Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824-24837 (v. 5). https://openreview.net/pdf?id=_VjQlMeSB_J
  108. Wei, L. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied linguistics, 39(1), 9-30. ◊ https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039 · DOI · Paper page
  109. Witte, A. (2023). Bringing the body into play: The corporeal aspect in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 107(3), 693-712. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12861 · DOI
  110. Woo, D. J., Susanto, H., Yeung, C. H., Guo, K., Fung, A. K. Y. (2024). Exploring AI-Generated text in student writing: How does AI help? Language Learning & Technology, 28(2). 180-205. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73577
  111. Zhang, Z., & Li, W. (2020). Enacted agency in a cross-border, online biliteracy curriculum making: Creativity and bilingual digital storytelling. McGill Journal of Education, 55(3), 550-567. https://doi.org/10.7202/ · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godwin-Jones, R.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
5-31
ISSN
1094-3501 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2403.20216
arXiv
2403.20216
OpenAlex
W4413183883
Cited by
178
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 113 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 7
FWCI
66.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Language learning & technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
generative AI, second language acquisition, second language teaching, ChatGPT, distributed agency, shared agency, human-AI interaction, corrective feedback, sociomaterialism, AI ethics, sociocultural aspects of language, immersive technologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review