The DOI matches its DataCite record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvement
Open accessAbstract
Researchers have made significant progress in automating the software development process in the past decades. Recent progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly impacted the development process, where developers can use LLM-based programming assistants to achieve automated coding. Nevertheless, software engineering involves the process of program improvement apart from coding, specifically to enable software maintenance (e.g. bug fixing) and software evolution (e.g. feature additions). In this paper, we propose an automated approach for solving GitHub issues to autonomously achieve program improvement. In our approach called AutoCodeRover, LLMs are combined with sophisticated code search capabilities, ultimately leading to a program modification or patch. In contrast to recent LLM agent approaches from AI researchers and practitioners, our outlook is more software engineering oriented. We work on a program representation (abstract syntax tree) as opposed to viewing a software project as a mere collection of files. Our code search exploits the program structure in the form of classes/methods to enhance LLM's understanding of the issue's root cause, and effectively retrieve a context via iterative search. The use of spectrum-based fault localization using tests, further sharpens the context, as long as a test-suite is available. Experiments on SWE-bench-lite (300 real-life GitHub issues) show increased efficacy in solving GitHub issues (19% on SWE-bench-lite), which is higher than the efficacy of the recently reported SWE-agent. In addition, AutoCodeRover achieved this efficacy with significantly lower cost (on average, $0.43 USD), compared to other baselines. We posit that our workflow enables autonomous software engineering, where, in future, auto-generated code from LLMs can be autonomously improved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Single-harness systems such as SWE-agent [30], AutoCodeRover [38], OpenHands [29], and mini-SWE-agent [32] report per-system numbers, but their scaffolds, prompts, budgets, and termination policies vary with the system, making cross-system differences hard to attribute to harness design.”
From Claw-SWE-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating OpenClaw-style Agent Harnesses on Coding Tasks (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Each of these reports per-harness resolved rates but does not vary the harness as an experimental axis: prompt, scaffold, runtime, and termination policy are bundled together with each release.”
From Claw-SWE-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating OpenClaw-style Agent Harnesses on Coding Tasks (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Despite its challenging nature, performance on SWE-bench has been steadily increasing (Zhang et al., 2024; factory.ai,2024).”
From MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2024
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“AutoCodeRover [38] adds code-aware retrieval to the agent loop.”
From Claw-SWE-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating OpenClaw-style Agent Harnesses on Coding Tasks (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Survey on Software Fault Localization
Wong, W. E., Gao, R., Li, Y., Abreu, R., & Wotawa, F. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2016.2521368 · Cited by 1,110
Competition-level code generation with AlphaCode
Li, Y., Choi, D., Chung, J., Kushman, N., Schrittwieser, J., Leblond, R., Eccles, T., Keeling, J., Gimeno, F., Dal Lago, A., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abq1158 · Cited by 1,043
Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode
Li, Y., Choi, D., Chung, J., Kushman, N., Schrittwieser, J., Leblond, R., Eccles, T., Keeling, J., Gimeno, F., Lago, A. D., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.07814 · Cited by 1,043
On the Accuracy of Spectrum-based Fault Localization
Abreu, R., Zoeteweij, P., & van Gemund, A. V. (2007) · Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference Practice and Research Techniques - MUTATION (TAICPART-MUTATION 2007) · doi:10.1109/taic.part.2007.13 · Cited by 939
Visualization of test information to assist fault localization
Jones, J. A., Harrold, M. J., & Stasko, J. (2002) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/581339.581397 · Cited by 925
Symbolic execution for software testing
Cadar, C., & Sen, K. (2013) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2408776.2408795 · Cited by 785
Automatically finding patches using genetic programming
Weimer, W. R., Nguyen, T. H., Goues, C. L., & Forrest, S. (2009) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse.2009.5070536 · Cited by 768
Böhme, M., Pham, V.-T., Nguyen, M.-D., & Roychoudhury, A. (2017) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/3133956.3134020 · Cited by 759
Self-citationMechtaev, S., Yi, J., & Roychoudhury, A. (2016) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/2884781.2884807 · Cited by 515
Self-citationAutomated Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language Models
Xia, C. S., Wei, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00129 · Cited by 433
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Marcel Böhme, Cristian Cadar, and Abhik Roychoudhury. 2021. Fuzzing: Chal- lenges and Reflections. IEEE Software 38, 3 (2021).
- Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Pondé de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harrison Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, Alex Ray, Raul Puri, Gretchen Krueger, Michael Petrov, Heidy Khlaaf, Girish Sastry, Pamela Mishkin, Brooke Chan, Scott Gray, Nick Ryder, Mikhail Pavlov, Alethea Power, Lukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Bavarian, Clemens Winter, Philippe Tillet, Felipe Petroski Such, Dave Cummings, Matthias Plappert, Fotios Chantzis, Elizabeth Barnes, Ariel Herbert-Voss, William Hebgen Guss, Alex Nichol, Alex Paino, Nikolas Tezak, Jie Tang, Igor Babuschkin, Suchir Balaji, Shantanu Jain, William Saunders, Christopher Hesse, Andrew N. Carr, Jan Leike, Joshua Achiam, Vedant Misra, Evan Morikawa, Alec Radford, Matthew Knight, Miles Brundage, Mira Murati, Katie Mayer, Peter Welinder, Bob McGrew, Dario Amodei, Sam McCandlish, Ilya Sutskever, and Wojciech Zaremba. 2021. Evaluat- ing Large Language Models Trained on Code. arXiv.org abs/2107.03374 (7 2021). arXiv:2107.03374 https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374 · arXiv
- Claire Le Goues, Michael Pradel, and Abhik Roychoudhury. 2019. Automated program repair. Commun. ACM 62 (11 2019), 56-65. Issue 12.
- Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, Kexin Pei, Ofir Press, and Karthik Narasimhan. 2024. Leaderboard results on SWE-bench. Retrieved April 8, 2024 from https://www.swebench.com/
- Carlos E Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, Kexin Pei, Ofir Press, and Karthik R Narasimhan. 2024. SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=VTF8yNQM66
- Wuxia Jin et al. 2024. PyAnalyzer: An Effective and Practical Approach for De- pendency Extraction from Python Code. In International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).
- Thibaud Lutellier, Hung Viet Pham, Lawrence Pang, Yitong Li, Moshi Wei, and Lin Tan. 2020. CoCoNuT: combining context-aware neural translation models us- ing ensemble for program repair., In ISSTA '20: 29th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, Virtual Event, USA, July 18-22, 2020, Sarfraz Khurshid and Corina S. Pasareanu (Eds.). International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, 101-114.
- Sergey Mechtaev, Jooyong Yi, and Abhik Roychoudhury. 2016. Angelix: scalable multiline program patch synthesis via symbolic analysis., In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2016, Austin, TX, USA, May 14-22, 2016, Laura K. Dillon, Willem Visser, and Laurie Williams (Eds.). International Conference on Software Engineering, 691-701.
- Yannic Noller, Ridwan Shariffdeen, Xiang Gao, and Abhik Roychoudhury. 2022. Trust Enhancement Issues in Program Repair. In IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).
- David Williams, James Callan, Serkan Kirbas, Sergey Mechtaev, Justyna Petke, Thomas Prideaux-Ghee, and Federica Sarro. 2023. User-Centric Deployment of Automated Program Repair at Bloomberg. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10516 (2023). · arXiv
- W Eric Wong, Ruizhi Gao, Yihao Li, Rui Abreu, and Franz Wotawa. 2016. A survey on software fault localization. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 42, 8 (2016), 707-740.
- John Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret, Shunyu Yao, Karthik Narasimhan, and Ofir Press. 2024. SWE-agent: Agent-Computer In- terfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering. arXiv:2405.15793 [cs.SE] · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 208
Le, T.-H.-C., Hua, H.-Q.-B., & Le, X.-B. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3834420 · Cited by 1
Dialogagent: An Auto-Engagement Agent for Code Question Answering Data Production
Liang, X., Ren, J., Qi, J., Peng, C., & Jiang, B. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1109/icse-seip66354.2025.00012 · Cited by 1
CodexGraph: Bridging Large Language Models and Code Repositories via Code Graph Databases
Liu, X., Lan, B., Hu, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, F., Shieh, M., & Zhou, W. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.03910 · Cited by 1
Barbaste, P., Darrigol, T., Vu, G., & Wiltberger, T. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.00006
Claw-SWE-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating OpenClaw-style Agent Harnesses on Coding Tasks
Zheng, M., Han, K., Li, B., Xu, H., Tian, Y., He, W., Zhou, H., Guo, J., Hu, H., Ma, L., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.12344
When Does Restricting a Coding Agent to execute_code Help? A Regime $\times$ Agent-Design Ablation
Yang, H., Yu, Q., & Desell, T. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.10569
Towards Quality Assurance of Natural Language in Code
Zhong, R. (2025) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse-companion66252.2025.00056
ConAgent: Agent-based concolic testing to generate test data for Qt projects
Trong, D. N., Huu, D. N., Tran, L. N. T., Nguyen, D., & Hùng, P. N. (2026) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2026.108301
Configuring Parameters of Search-based Software Engineering Tools with Multiple LLM Models
Nouchi, D., Freire, W. M., Amaral, A. M. M. M., Vergílio, S. R., & Colanzi, T. E. (2025) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Engenharia de Software (SBES) · doi:10.5753/sbes.2025.11005
Learning of Indonesian Language and Literature Based on Digital Technology Artificial Intelligence
Setiyawan, D. (2025) · European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning · doi:10.59324/ejceel.2025.3(6).14
SEAlign: Alignment Training for Software Engineering Agent
Zhang, K., Zhang, H., Li, G., You, J., Li, J., Zhao, Y., & Jin, Z. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3744916.3764563 · Cited by 5
WIP: Literature Review on LLMs to Improve Code
Nadendla, S., Karanam, S., & Gehringer, E. F. (2025) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie63693.2025.11328320
An Agent-based Evaluation Framework for Complex Code Generation
Wang, X., Hu, R., Gao, P., Peng, C., & Gao, C. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase63991.2025.00200 · Cited by 11
LEDGE : Leveraging dependency graphs for enhanced context aware documentation generation
Panchal, M., Deo, A., Prabhu, V. V., Doshi, P., Bhadane, C., & Bari, P. (2026) · Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10515-026-00596-y
LLMs as Continuous Learners: Improving Software Issue Reproduction by Distilling ExperiencesPreprint
Lin, Y., CHEN, S., Ma, Y., Cao, R., Li, B., Huang, F., li, Y., & Gu, X. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6170084
Liang, C., Zhao, Y., & Mo, R. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-7081-2_16
Policy-Governed Agentic Autonomous Quality Assurance for Enterprise Systems
Kunda, A. K. (2025) · International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering · doi:10.22399/ijcesen.4933 · Cited by 1
Research on Automated Software Documentation Generation Based on Modular Design
Qiao, M., Li, L., Hou, B., SHANG, Z., & Luo, Z. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Science and Management Technology (ICCSMT) · doi:10.1145/3795154.3795348
MetaSpace: Metamorphic Testing for Spatial Cognition in Embodied Agents
Xu, G. F., Xiao, D., Peng, Y., & Wang, S. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3798212
LLM-based multi-agent systems for code generation: A multi-vocal literature review
Rasheeda, Z., Waseema, M., Kemella, K.-K., Saari, M., & Abrahamsson, P. (2026) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2026.113142 · Cited by 3
CppPerf: An Automated Pipeline and Dataset for Performance-Improving C++ Commits
Ho, T., Etemadi, K., & Su, Z. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3834606
Large Language Models in Software Security Analysis
Wolff, D., Мирчев, М., & Roychoudhury, A. (2026) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3770922
Self-citationChen, Z., Lin, L., Lin, X., Chen, Y., & Wang, L. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16104788
Towards Structured, State-Aware, and Execution-Grounded Reasoning for Software Engineering Agents
Chen, T.-H. P. (2026) · BoatSE@ICSE · doi:10.1145/3786161.3788456 · Cited by 2
Evaluating Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis
Chen, M., Cheng, H., Su, T., Chen, M., Cai, W., & Zou, H. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15102222
From Bug Report to Pull Request: An Autonomous Agent Pipeline for Production Issue Resolution
Milev, R., Kanagala, U., & Cholette, C. (2026) · ACM Conference on AI and Agentic Systems (CAIS) · doi:10.1145/3786335.3813187
The Retriever in the Loop: A Systematic Mapping of Code Retrieval in Language-Model-Based SystemsPreprint
Petrachini, A., Melo, L. C. D. A., & de França, B. B. N. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6814276
DraftNEPABench: A Benchmark for Drafting NEPA Document Sections with Coding Agents
Acharya, A., Lakha, B., Meyur, R., Nuttall, R., Chaturvedi, S., Halappanavar, A., Hare, L., Zeng, L., Parker, M., Munikoti, S., et al. (2026) · ACM Conference on AI and Agentic Systems (CAIS) · doi:10.1145/3786335.3813132
SGAgent : Suggestion-Guided LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for Repository-Level Software Repair
Zhang, Q., Gao, C., Han, Y., Shang, Y., Fang, C., Chen, Z., & Xiao, L. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3818617 · Cited by 12
kAPR: A coverage-guided, context-aware agent for automated repair of Linux kernel bugs
Li, B., Yin, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., & Ji, S. (2026) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2026.108198
Self-citationSmartDoc: A Context-Aware Agentic Method Comment Generation Plugin
Etemadi, V., & Robles, G. (2026) · doi:10.1145/3786151.3788601
Gudimetla, S., Gangula, S., Adinarayana, R., Challa, C., Vunnam, S., & Buhyavarapu, S. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Systems, and Emerging Technologies (ICAISET) · doi:10.1109/icaiset66439.2026.11541473
Repowise: A Hybrid RAG-Based Conversational System for Software Repository Analysis
Kocadere, M. O., Cömert, Y. E., Yazıcı, S., Karaçay, Ş. G., Yıldız, İ. B., & Erdoğan, T. G. (2026) · International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (ICHORA) · doi:10.1109/ichora69329.2026.11537220
Tan, W., Li, Y., & Liang, W. (2026) · International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3805622.3810701 · Cited by 1
Streamlining Repository Tasks with Effective Snippet Retrieval
Xu, T., Li, C., Xu, Z., Jiang, Y., Yao, Y., Zhu, X., Xu, F., Di, P., Xu, C., & Su, Z. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3821433
An Empirical Study of Waterfall-style Multi-Agent Workflows for Class-Level Code Generation
Shafin, W. I., Rafi, M. N., Li, Z., & Chen, T.-H. P. (2026) · doi:10.1145/3803846.3807461
IntentTester: Intent-Driven Multi-agent Framework for Cross-Library Test Migration
橘高, 義., Zhang, Z., Hu, X., Yang, X., & Xia, X. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3797096
iCoRe: An Iterative Correlation-Aware Retriever for Bug Reproduction Test Generation
Wang, J., Cao, J., & Liu, Z. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3808193
Denoising Fault Localization with Test Line Proximity
Smytzek, M., & Zeller, A. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3808110
PortGPT: Towards Automated Backporting Using Large Language Models
Li, Z. L., Yu, Z., Song, J., Xu, M., Luo, Y., & Mu, D. (2026) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp63933.2026.00034 · Cited by 2
Wang, H., Yu, R., Pang, Y., Zhao, Y., Chen, J., Jiang, J., & Wang, Z. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3744916.3787792
Progressively Mitigating API Hallucination in LLM-Generated Code via Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Li, Y., Ma, Z., Zou, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Xie, B. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) · doi:10.1109/saner67736.2026.00086
On the Time Efficiency of Code Generated and Optimized by Large Language Models
Peng, Y., Wan, J., Ren, X., Menzies, T., & Lyu, M. R.-T. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2026.3709872
When Code Authors Are Agents: A Large-Scale Study of Human–Agent Collaboration in Pull Requests
Njoku, A. O., Sharafi, Z., & Khomh, F. (2026) · ACM International Conference on AI-Powered Software (AIware) · doi:10.1145/3805760.3814909
LLM-Based Automated Diagnosis Of Integration Test Failures At Google
Ziftci, C., Liu, R., Greene, S., & Dalloro, L. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1145/3786583.3786863
Fixing Security Vulnerabilities with Agentic AI in OSS-Fuzz
Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Berzin, D., Мирчев, М., & Roychoudhury, A. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1145/3786583.3786880 · Cited by 3
Self-citationBöhme, M. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST) · doi:10.1109/icst69053.2026.00097
Jin, H., Wen, J., Bi, Z., Huang, L., & Chen, H. (2026) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3803437.3805794
DePro: Understanding the Role of LLMs in Debugging Competitive Programming Code
Parvez, N., Pallab, M. T. S., Imran, M. M., & Zaman, T. S. (2026) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3803437.3805561
CoRenameAgent: A Human-In-The-Loop, Multi-Agent Tool for Coordinated Rename Refactoring
Bellur, A., Ullah, M. R., Batole, F., Kansara, M., Morimoto, M., Ishikawa, K., Chen, H., Klause, H., Zharov, Y., Bryksin, T., et al. (2026) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3803437.3806418
Chen, F., Yang, G., Lee, C., Jie, Z., & Chen, Y. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3831589
Benchmarking Open-Weight LLMs for Security Backporting
Sghaier, S., Daoud, M. A., Chaieb, M., & Chouchen, M. (2026) · Intelligence in Business and Industry (IBI) · doi:10.1109/ibi68858.2026.11604072
Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Han, J., Zhi, C., & Deng, S. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) · doi:10.1145/3794763.3794815 · Cited by 2
Gong, S., Wang, M., Wang, J., & Cai, Y. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) · doi:10.1145/3794763.3794823
PaperRepro: Automated Computational Reproducibility Assessment for Social Science Papers
Zhang, L., Xia, T., Piao, J., & Cui, L. (2026) · Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 · doi:10.1145/3770855.3818943
Cao, Y., Keung, J., Wang, Y., Sun, Y., & Mao, Z. (2026) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac69091.2026.00062
ReviewTestFuse: Fusing review-guided and direct test generation for deployable regression testing
Zhen, H., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10515-026-00669-y
CGARF: a causality-guided framework for reliable automated program repair
Yuan, L., Liu, S., Wang, Y., Yao, Y.-W., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, T., & Mao, T. (2026) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-026-10940-1
CI-Bench: A Framework for Evaluating Large Language Model Tools on CI Failures
Nabil, R. L., Zhu, H., & Rubio-González, C. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3774748.3787606
Change And Cover: Last-Mile, Pull Request-Based Regression Test Augmentation
Zhou, Z., Paltenghi, M., Kim, M., & Pradel, M. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3744916.3787768
MaCTG: Multi-Agent Collaborative Thought Graph for Automatic Programming
Zhao, Z., Sun, J., Hóu, Z., Wei, Z., Cai, C., Qiao, M., & Dong, J. S. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3744916.3773221 · Cited by 9
Synthetic Repo-level Bug Dataset for Training Automated Program Repair Models
Minh, P. V. T., Phan, H. N., Phan, N. H., Le, C. A., Nguyen, T. N., & Bui, N. D. Q. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3744916.3764562
Rafi, M. N., Kim, D. J., Chen, T.-H., & Wang, S. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.18750
Agent-Based Ensemble Reasoning for Repository-Level Issue Resolution
Tian, Z., Gao, P., Chen, J., & Peng, C. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3744916.3787761
MioHint: LLM-Assisted Request Mutation for Whitebox REST API Testing
Li, J., Shen, J., Su, Y., & Lyu, M. R.-T. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3744916.3773228
Generative File Systems: Specification-Driven Synthesis and Evolution via LLMs
Liu, Q., Zhang, H., Zou, M., Du, D., Xia, Y., & Chen, H. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Storage · doi:10.1145/3844149
PyHealer: Agentic Self-Repair for Python Program ExecutionPreprint
Sakib, S., Asaduzzaman, M., Wang, S., & Bright, C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7478097
Jonnakuti, S. R. (2026) · International Conference on Modern Sustainable Systems (CMSS) · doi:10.1109/cmss69636.2026.11688270
Jonnakuti, S. R. (2026) · International Conference on Modern Sustainable Systems (CMSS) · doi:10.1109/cmss69636.2026.11688408
Messarhi, O., Kerdoudi, M. L., & Tibermacine, O. (2026) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2026.113101
Execution Control Harness for Governed LLM-Based Code Generation
Takeda, M., Funaya, Y., Harriet, O., Mibe, R., & Kanuka, H. (2026) · International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) · doi:10.1109/iisa71656.2026.11705535
DepTwin: A Digital Twin-Based Framework to Manage Deployments in Cloud
Ahlawat, S., & Sharma, K. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15194443
Bravo, E. J. G., Chavira, G., Álvarez-Navarro, E., Montoto-González, A., & Juarez, J. L. D. (2026) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers15100657
Closed-Loop LLM-Driven Self-Healing for Enterprise Data Pipelines
Sivaraman, M. K. (2026) · Technology and Innovation Conference (TIC) · doi:10.1109/tic68483.2026.11703022
Marasinghe, M. M. K. S., Fernando, D. C. Y., Senarathne, G. S. R. U. R., Bambarendage, T. L. P., Kasthurirathna, D., & Jayalath, J. M. T. I. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Technology Applications (ICCTA) · doi:10.1109/iccta70480.2026.11706444
NSync: Automated Cloud Infrastructure-as-Code Reconciliation with AI Agents
Yang, Z., Guan, H., Nicolet, V., Paulsen, B., Dodds, J., Kroening, D., & Chen, A. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3832121
AgentInspect: Diagnosing Behavioral Failures in Artificial Intelligence Agents
Manke, R., Wardat, M., Khomh, F., & Rajan, H. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3832174
SAGE: Signal-Amplified Guided Embeddings for Vulnerability Detection
Shan, Z., Qian, X., Xin, J., Xu, M., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., Wu, H., & Cheng, X. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3832141 · Cited by 1
Self-citationLLM-Based Repair of Static Nullability Errors
Karimipour, N., Joos, P., Pradel, M., Kellogg, M., & Sridharan, M. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3832114
Automated Program Repair for UI-Centric Android Bugs: How Far Are We?
Mahmud, J., Pandey, S., Silva, N. D., Dipongkor, A. K., Wu, J., Chaparro, O., Fazzini, M., & Moran, K. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3832272
No One-Size-Fits-All: Adaptive Code Editing with Feature-Based Strategy Selection
Wan, J., Liu, Z., Chen, D., Jiang, W., Li, Y., & Ren, X. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3832234
SWE-PDB: Teaching LLMs to Leverage Debugging Tools via Agentic Training
Liu, J., Hu, X., & Xia, X. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3832117
CoCoMUT: A Tool for Code-Context Mining and Automated Dataset Generation
Botta, A., Garisa, S., Akurathi, J. V., Sabit, A. A., Woodlief, T., & Hossain, S. B. (2026) · ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Systems, Programming, Languages, and Applications: Software for Humanity (SPLASH) · doi:10.1145/3837729.3840485
Zhang, T., Mao, X., Zhao, Y., Yang, K., Zhang, Z., Lu, Y., Chen, Y., & Yu, Y. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3849809
Wen, X.-C., Chen, B., Lan, H., Yu, H., Di, P., & Gao, C. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3834438 · Cited by 3
Who Should Own the Loop? Harness Decomposition for Small-Model Repository Repair
Dente, F., Satriani, D., Santoro, D., Veltri, E., & Papotti, P. (2026) · International Workshop on Agentic AI for Next-Generation Software Development · doi:10.1145/3843282.3844442
Wan, Y., Liang, T., Xu, J., Xiao, J., Huo, Y., & Lyu, M. R.-T. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3834388
MERA: A Multi-expert LLM Framework for Severity Assessment of User Tickets in Mobile OS Beta Testing
Sun, Y., Zuo, Y., Zhang, Q., Hao, B., Gu, W., Luan, J., Zhou, S., Zhang, S., & Pei, D. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3834518
RegoMender: A Multi-agent Framework for Automated Rego Policy Repair
Zhang, R., Yin, H., Hu, L., Kong, F., Liang, H., Cheng, S., Zhang, K., & Tu, B. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3837490
Wen, X.-C., Luo, H., Gao, C., Zhu, H., Xiao, Y., & Li, G. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3837547
From Automated Program Repair to Automated Agent Repair: Why Failed Trajectories Matter
Zhao, X. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3844579
CiL-Agent: Compiler-in-the-Loop LLM Agent for Memory-Safe C Program Repair
Shen, Y., Zhang, Y., Yao, J., Liu, M., & Dong, W. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3837493
Self-citationCatching Developers in the Flow: Low-Latency Agentic Program Repair at Google Scale
Ziftci, C., Greene, S., Liu, R., Dalloro, L., & Dini, L. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3834511
Schema-Conditioned Next-Tool Prediction for Coding Agents under Interface Drift
Nyberg, S., & Karlsson, I. (2026) · International Workshop on Agentic AI for Next-Generation Software Development · doi:10.1145/3843282.3844430
Toward Trace-Guided Automated Program Repair
Reichelt, D. G., Yang, S., & Hasselbring, W. (2026) · doi:10.1145/3843779.3844631
Reconstructing Executable Programs from Informal Bug Reports
Ayon, R. S. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3844575
Fang, S., Ding, W., Zhang, M., Chen, Z., & Xu, B. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3850240
Reiss, S. P. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Automated Program Repair (APR) · doi:10.1145/3843776.3844674
Beyond Outcomes: Toward Process-Aware Software Agents
Liu, S. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3844569
From Code to Knowledge: Enhancing Coding Agents via Reverse-Engineered Software Knowledge
Zhang, Y., Ge, Y., & Liu, X. (2026) · doi:10.1145/3844178.3844645
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Ruan, H., Fan, Z., & Roychoudhury, A.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 1592-1604
- arXiv
- 2404.05427
- OpenAlex
- W4402442868
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 123 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 9
- FWCI
- 76.83
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, India
- Bộ Giáo dục và Ðào tạo
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Keywords
- program improvement, program repair, large language models, code search, spectrum-based fault localization, abstract syntax tree, software maintenance, software evolution, LLM agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
