The DOI matches its DataCite record.
An Economic Solution to Copyright Challenges of Generative AI
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems are trained on large data corpora to generate new pieces of text, images, videos, and other media. There is growing concern that such systems may infringe on the copyright interests of training data contributors. To address the copyright challenges of generative AI, we propose a framework that compensates copyright owners proportionally to their contributions to the creation of AI-generated content. The metric for contributions is quantitatively determined by leveraging the probabilistic nature of modern generative AI models and using techniques from cooperative game theory in economics. This framework enables a platform where AI developers benefit from access to high-quality training data, thus improving model performance. Meanwhile, copyright owners receive fair compensation, driving the continued provision of relevant data for generative model training. Experiments demonstrate that our framework successfully identifies the most relevant data sources used in artwork generation, ensuring a fair and interpretable distribution of revenues among copyright owners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrary, Wang et al. (2024) proposes to mitigate the black-box nature of content generation by leveraging the probabilistic nature of generative models: the log-likelihood of generating a content is used to measure the utility of the training data from which it derives.”
From Generative AI and intellectual property: a systematic literature review of possible issues and mitigations (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“Although the approach proposed by Wang et al. (2024) has proven effective in correctly attributing relevance to data sources associated with generated outputs, it requires retraining the model multiple times to assess the utility of each source.”
From Generative AI and intellectual property: a systematic literature review of possible issues and mitigations (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“The substantial computational costs involved make it practically feasible only when dealing with a limited number of copyright owners.”
From Generative AI and intellectual property: a systematic literature review of possible issues and mitigations (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Sébastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan, Johannes Gehrke, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar, Peter Lee, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Scott Lundberg, et al. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712, 2023. · arXiv
- Mark Alexander Burgess and Archie C Chapman. Approximating the shapley value using stratified empirical bernstein sampling. In IJCAI, pages 73-81, 2021.
- Hiroaki Chiba-Okabe and Weijie J. Su. Tackling genai copyright issues: Originality estimation and genericization. arXiv preprint arxiv:2406.03341, 2024. · arXiv
- Timothy Chu, Zhao Song, and Chiwun Yang. How to protect copyright data in optimization of large language models? arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12247, 2023. · arXiv
- R Dennis Cook and Sanford Weisberg. Characterizations of an empirical influence function for detecting influential cases in regression. Technometrics, 22(4):495-508, 1980.
- Junwei Deng and Jiaqi Ma. Computational copyright: Towards a royalty model for ai music generation platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06646, 2023. · arXiv
- Pradeep Dubey, Abraham Neyman, and Robert James Weber. Value theory without efficiency. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6(1):122-128, 1981.
- Leo Gao, Stella Biderman, Sid Black, Laurence Golding, Travis Hoppe, Charles Foster, Jason Phang, Horace He, Anish Thite, Noa Nabeshima, et al. The pile: An 800gb dataset of diverse text for language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00027, 2020. · arXiv
- Amirata Ghorbani and James Zou. Data shapley: Equitable valuation of data for machine learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2242-2251. PMLR, 2019.
- Robert P Gilles, Guillermo Owen, and Rene van den Brink. Games with permission structures: the conjunctive approach. International Journal of Game Theory, 20(3):277-293, 1992.
- Dongge Han, Michael Wooldridge, Alex Rogers, Shruti Tople, Olga Ohrimenko, and Sebastian Tschiatschek. Replication-robust payoff-allocation for machine learning data markets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.14583, 2020. · arXiv
- Luxi He, Yangsibo Huang, Weijia Shi, Tinghao Xie, Haotian Liu, Yue Wang, Luke Zettlemoyer, Chiyuan Zhang, Danqi Chen, and Peter Henderson. Fantastic copyrighted beasts and how (not) to generate them. arXiv preprint arxiv:2406.14526, 2024. · arXiv
- Peter Henderson, Xuechen Li, Dan Jurafsky, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Mark A. Lemley, and Percy Liang. Foundation models and fair use. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15715, 2023. · arXiv
- Edward J Hu, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, Weizhu Chen, et al. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
- Ferenc Illés and Péter Kerényi. Estimation of the shapley value by ergodic sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05224, 2019. · arXiv
- Ruoxi Jia, David Dao, Boxin Wang, Frances Ann Hubis, Nick Hynes, Nezihe Merve Gürel, Bo Li, Ce Zhang, Dawn Song, and Costas J Spanos. Towards efficient data valuation based on the shapley value. In The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1167-1176. PMLR, 2019.
- Yannis Kalantidis, Lluis Garcia Pueyo, Michele Trevisiol, Roelof van Zwol, and Yannis Avrithis. Scalable triangulation-based logo recognition. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM in- ternational conference on multimedia retrieval, pages 1-7, 2011.
- Katherine Lee, A Feder Cooper, and James Grimmelmann. Talkin"bout ai generation: Copy- right and the generative-ai supply chain. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.08133, 2023. · arXiv
- Katherine Lee, Daphne Ippolito, Andrew Nystrom, Chiyuan Zhang, Douglas Eck, Chris Callison-Burch, and Nicholas Carlini. Deduplicating training data makes language models better. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8424-8445, 2022.
- Xiaochang Lei. Pro-rata vs user-centric in the music streaming industry. Economics Letters, 226:111111, 2023.
- Xiang Li, Qianli Shen, and Kenji Kawaguchi. Probabilistic copyright protection can fail for text-to-image generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00057, 2023. · arXiv
- Jinkun Lin, Anqi Zhang, Mathias Lécuyer, Jinyang Li, Aurojit Panda, and Siddhartha Sen. Measuring the effect of training data on deep learning predictions via randomized experiments. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 13468-13504. PMLR, 2022.
- Ramin Okhrati and Aldo Lipani. A multilinear sampling algorithm to estimate shapley val- ues. In 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pages 7992-7999. IEEE, 2021.
- Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684-10695, 2022.
- Alvin E Roth. Introduction to the shapley value. The Shapley value, pages 1-27, 1988.
- Matthew Sag. Copyright safety for generative ai. Houston Law Review, 61(2):295-347, 2023.
- Babak Saleh and Ahmed Elgammal. Large-scale classification of fine-art paintings: Learning the right metric on the right feature. International Journal for Digital Art History, (2), 2016.
- Pamela Samuelson. Generative ai meets copyright. Science, 381(6654):158-161, 2023.
- Shawn Shan, Jenna Cryan, Emily Wenger, Haitao Zheng, Rana Hanocka, and Ben Y Zhao. Glaze: Protecting artists from style mimicry by text-to-image models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04222, 2023. · arXiv
- Lloyd S Shapley. A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, 2(28):307- 317, 1953.
- Nikhil Vyas, Sham Kakade, and Boaz Barak. Provable copyright protection for generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.10870, 2023. · arXiv
- Jiachen T Wang and Ruoxi Jia. Data banzhaf: A robust data valuation framework for machine learning. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 6388-6421. PMLR, 2023.
- Jiachen T Wang and Ruoxi Jia. A note on" towards efficient data valuation based on the shapley value". arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11431, 2023. · arXiv
- Jiachen T Wang, Prateek Mittal, Dawn Song, and Ruoxi Jia. Data shapley in one training run. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11011, 2024. · arXiv
- Tianhao Wang, Yu Yang, and Ruoxi Jia. Improving cooperative game theory-based data valuation via data utility learning. ICLR 2022 Workshop on Socially Responsible Machine Learning, 2022.
- Jiaxi Yang, Wenglong Deng, Benlin Liu, Yangsibo Huang, and Xiaoxiao Li. Matching-based data valuation for generative model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10701, 2023. · arXiv
- Xiaosen Zheng, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Jing Jiang, and Min Lin. Intriguing properties of data attribution on diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00500, 2023. · arXiv
Cited by
Arnaudo, A., Coppola, R., Morisio, M., Vetrò, A., Borghi, M., Raso, R., & Khan, B. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3928 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J. T., Deng, Z., Chiba-Okabe, H., Barak, B., & Su, W. J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- arXiv
- 2404.13964
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Economic Solution to Copyright Challenges of Generative AI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2404.13964
- The paper
- Wang, J. T., Deng, Z., Chiba-Okabe, H., Barak, B., & Su, W. J. (2024). An Economic Solution to Copyright Challenges of Generative AI. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2404.13964
