The DOI matches its DataCite record; 154 of the 194 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
This survey presents a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon of hallucination in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), also known as Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), which have demonstrated significant advancements and remarkable abilities in multimodal tasks. Despite these promising developments, MLLMs often generate outputs that are inconsistent with the visual content, a challenge known as hallucination, which poses substantial obstacles to their practical deployment and raises concerns regarding their reliability in real-world applications. This problem has attracted increasing attention, prompting efforts to detect and mitigate such inaccuracies. We review recent advances in identifying, evaluating, and mitigating these hallucinations, offering a detailed overview of the underlying causes, evaluation benchmarks, metrics, and strategies developed to address this issue. Additionally, we analyze the current challenges and limitations, formulating open questions that delineate potential pathways for future research. By drawing the granular classification and landscapes of hallucination causes, evaluation benchmarks, and mitigation methods, this survey aims to deepen the understanding of hallucinations in MLLMs and inspire further advancements in the field. Through our thorough and in-depth review, we contribute to the ongoing dialogue on enhancing the robustness and reliability of MLLMs, providing valuable insights and resources for researchers and practitioners alike. Resources are available at: https://github.com/showlab/Awesome-MLLM-Hallucination.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recent investigations have increasingly drawn attention to the phenomenon of 'hallucinated references,' wherein LLMs such as ChatGPT generate citations that appear syntactically correct and contextually appropriate, yet do not correspond to any real or retrievable publication.”
From Fabricated or accurate? Ethical concerns and citation hallucination in aI-generated scientific writing on musculoskeletal topics (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · cited 1×
“In the realm of computer vision, object recognition is the core task, including sub-tasks such as object classification [60], detection [27], and segmentation [37], etc. Similarly, studies on hallucination in MLLMs primarily focus on object hallucination.”
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293 · cited 4×
“It first verifies that CLIPScore [88] can effectively distinguish between hallucinated and non-hallucinated sentences through a series of studies across different models and datasets.”
InfluentialLoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Chen, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09685 · Cited by 13,453 · cited 2×
“During this stage, there are various options for training, such as fine-tuning LLM parameters in full [75], or using techniques like LoRA [41] to tune specific LLM parameters.”
Kirillov, A., Mintun, E., Ravi, N., Mao, H., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Xiao, T., Whitehead, S., Berg, A. C., Lo, W.-Y., et al. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00371 · Cited by 11,953 · cited 1×
“With these additional annotations, it further supervises MLLMs with mask prediction loss using a state-of-the-art expert vision model, SAM [57], guiding MLLMs to focus on highly-related image content.”
Self-citationProximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625 · cited 1×
“To better align with human preferences, RLHF optimizes the LLM to generate outputs that maximize rewards provided by the trained preference model, often utilizing reinforcement learning algorithms like Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) [93].”
(2019) · AI & Quantum Computing for Finance & Insurance · doi:10.1142/9789811203909_0022 · Cited by 9,775 · cited 1×
“Recently, the emergence of large language models (LLMs) [29, 81, 85, 99, 132] has dominated a wide range of tasks in natural language processing (NLP), achieving unprecedented progress in language understanding [39, 47], generation [128, 140] and reasoning [20, 58, 87, 107, 115].”
Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders
Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., & Manzagol, P.-A. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390294 · Cited by 7,436 · cited 1×
“Specifically, inspired by denoising autoencoders [101], which are designed to reconstruct clean data from corrupted input, LURE [137] employs a hallucination revisor that aims to transform potentially hallucinatory descriptions into accurate ones.”
Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers
Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., Jegou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., & Joulin, A. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00951 · Cited by 5,638 · cited 1×
“However, CLIP has been shown to lose some visual details compared to pure vision models like DINO ViT [10].”
Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations
Krishna, R., Zhu, Y., Groth, O., Johnson, J., Hata, K., Kravitz, J., Chen, S., Kalantidis, Y., Li, L.-J., Shamma, D. A., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7 · Cited by 5,107 · cited 1×
“During the instruction tuning stage, both machine-generated datasets [75] and human-annotated QA datasets [48, 59, 80] are utilized to enhance the model’s ability to comprehend and follow multimodal instructions.”
Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2011 · Cited by 3,117 · cited 1×
“(RLHF) [19, 84, 94] emerges as a notable approach for achieving alignment through reinforcement learning.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 468
Driving by the Rules: A Benchmark for Integrating Traffic Sign Regulations into Vectorized HD Map
Chang, X.-Y., Xue, M., Liu, X., Pan, Z., & Wei, X. (2024) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.00640 · Cited by 18
“However, addressing hallucination [6] remains the most crucial aspect for LLM-based approaches.”
When Context Leads but Parametric Memory Follows in Large Language Models
Tao, Y.-F., Hiatt, A., Haake, E., Jetter, A. J., & Agrawal, A. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.08435 · Cited by 18
“Hallucination detection For sentences classified as parametric knowledge, we further assess whether they are factually accurate or hallucinated as LLMs are known to hallucinate (Huang et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2024b; Bai et al., 2024).”
Staying VIGILant: Mitigating Visual Laziness via Counterfactual Visual Alignment in MLLMs
Xiao, X., Liu, C., Liao, C.-T., Zhang, Y.-B., Lan, Q.-Z., Wei, Y.-X., Zhao, L., Wang, J., Gu, J., Ye, M.-C., et al. (2026) · European Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.26387 · Cited by 17
ONLY: One-Layer Intervention Sufficiently Mitigates Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models
Wan, Z., Zhang, C., Yong, S., Ma, M. Q., Stepputtis, S., Morency, L., Ramanan, D., Sycara, K. P., & Xie, Y. (2025) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.00309 · Cited by 27
“Contact: zifuw@cs.cmu.edu . of LVLMs in real-world applications where precise visual interpretation is essential [2, 3, 24].”
Behavioral Indicators of Overreliance During Interaction with Conversational Language Models
Liu, C., Zhou, Q., Shen, X., Liu, X. B., Wu, T., & Chen, X. '. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790332 · Cited by 14
“However,LLMs’responses,whileoftenappearing fluentandplausible,maycontainmisinformationstemmingfrom hallucinations,outdatedinformation,andpromptinjectionattacks [4,40,105].”
Luo, M., Wu, S., Jing, L., Ju, T., Li, Z., Lai, J., Wu, T., Du, X., Li, J., Yan, S., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-026-02831-1 · Cited by 11
“To combat the hallucination issues in LVMs, it is essential to develop comprehensive and accurate evaluation protocols.”
Learning to Steer: Input-dependent Steering for Multimodal LLMs
Parekh, J., Khayatan, P., Shukor, M., Dapogny, A., Newson, A., & Cord, M. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.12815 · Cited by 16
“Metrics Following prior work [3, 13, 33, 44, 47], we evaluate hallucinations on POPE dataset (using the test subset of our partition) using standard classification metrics: Accuracy , defined as the proportion of samples in which the model gives the correct answer regarding the presence or absence…”
Unified Multimodal Understanding via Byte-Pair Visual Encoding
Zhang, W., Feng, Y., Luo, H., Li, Y., Yue, Z., Zheng, S., & Lu, Z. (2025) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.01206 · Cited by 10
“Recent analysis [3, 21, 62] indicates that this architectural design makes models prone to visual hallucinations, generating descriptions even when relevant visual information is absent.”
Hu, Z., Zhang, F., & Kuang, K. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.22002 · Cited by 11
“As illustrated in Figure 2(b), these studies make fine-grained editing or annotations to the hallucinations (Huang et al., 2024; Bai et al., 2024) present in the text output of the language model, thereby obtaining factual training data ( i.e. , high-preference data) with consistent linguistic…”
Robustness in Large Language Models: A Survey of Mitigation Strategies and Evaluation MetricsPreprint
Kumar, P., & Mishra, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18658 · Cited by 21
CoDA: Agentic Systems for Collaborative Data Visualization
Chen, Z.-C., Chen, J.-F., Arik, S. Ö., Sra, M., Pfister, T., & Yoon, J. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.03194 · Cited by 15
“LLM-based methods, like CoML4VIS (Chen et al., 2024), leverage chain-of-thought prompting to generate visualizations (Comanici et al., 2025), but often ingest raw data directly, risking token limit violations, hallucinations, and failures on multi-source data (Bai et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2024).”
ScaleCap: Inference-Time Scalable Image Captioning via Dual-Modality Debiasing
Xing, L., Huang, Q., Dong, X.-W., Zhang, P., Zang, Y., Cao, Y.-H., Li, J., Ding, S., Zhang, W.-M., Yu, N.-H., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.19848 · Cited by 15
Uncertainty Distillation: Teaching Language Models to Express Semantic ConfidencePreprint
Hager, S., Mueller, D. M., Duh, K., & Andrews, N. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.14749 · Cited by 11
“While the flexibility and quality of these models is appealing, they may still hallucinate or give incorrect answers (Rawte et al., 2023; Bai et al., 2024).”
Che, L.-W., Liu, T., Jia, J.-H., Qin, W., Tang, R.-X., & Pavlovic, V. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.02009 · Cited by 15
“Hallucination [1] affects the trustworthiness and reliability of LVLM for broad application.”
AHa-Bench: Benchmarking Audio Hallucinations in Large Audio-Language Models
Cheng, X.-Z., Fu, D.-J., Wen, C., Yu, S., Wang, Z., Ji, S., Arora, S., Jin, T., Watanabe, S., & Zhao, Z. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/085713-0398 · Cited by 15
“Building on this foundation, subsequent research [36, 23, 1] has extended hallucination studies to the visual domain, examining whether visual-language models (VLMs) exhibit similar problems.”
On Robustness and Chain-of-Thought Consistency of RL-Finetuned VLMs
Zhao, R., Shah, A. B., Zhu, X., Deng, X.-K., Jiang, Z.-Y., Yang, Y., Liebelt, J., & Mondal, A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.12506 · Cited by 14
“Prior analyses document weak visual grounding [11, 45], hallucinations [2, 9], and brittle use of chain-of-thought [33, 44], suggesting that benchmark accuracy can mask deeper vulnerabilities.”
GLSim: Detecting Object Hallucinations in LVLMs via Global-Local Similarity
Park, S., & Li, Y. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.19972 · Cited by 14
“Detecting such hallucinations is thus essential for safe and reliable deployment of LVLMs, and has become an increasingly active area of research [14].”
Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Adaptive Attention Calibration
Fazli, M., Wei, B., Sari, A., & Zhu, Z.-W. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.21472 · Cited by 14
“Hallucination in LVLMs occurs when generated outputs do not accurately reflect visual inputs, posing challenges to their reliability (Guan et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2024b; Bai et al., 2025).”
Mitigating Object Hallucinations in MLLMs via Multi-Frequency Perturbations
Li, S., Sun, J., Zheng, G.-D., Fan, X.-R., Shen, Y.-J., Lu, Y., Xi, Z.-H., Yang, Y., Tan, W.-M., Ji, T., et al. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.14895 · Cited by 14
“To tackle this issue, previous studies propose various methods [3, 27], which can be broadly categorized into training-time and inference-time methods.”
Mitigating Hallucinations in Diffusion Models through Adaptive Attention ModulationPreprint
Oorloff, T., Yacoob, Y., & Shrivastava, A. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.16872 · Cited by 12
“Hallucinations have been extensively studied in large language models (LLMs) [21, 48, 54] and large vision-language models (LVLMs) [4, 17, 27], but remain relatively underexplored in image-focused diffusion models.”
Poison as Cure: Visual Noise for Mitigating Object Hallucinations in LVMs
Zhang, K., Tao, K.-D., Tang, J.-S., & Wang, H. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.19164 · Cited by 14
“This perspective stems from a crucial observation that while hallucinations arise from biased parametric knowledge, they manifest specifically during the processing of real-world visual inputs (Gunjal et al., 2024; Bai et al., 2024).”
InfluentialPerformance Gap in Entity Knowledge Extraction Across Modalities in Vision Language Models
Cohen, I., Gottesman, D., Geva, M., & Giryes, R. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.14133 · Cited by 14
“Previous research has examined the internal information distribution within these models (Basu et al., 2024), highlighted the limitations arising from pre-trained vision encoders (Tong et al., 2024), and investigated the issue of hallucinations in VLMs (Bai et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2025).”
ProcBench: Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning and Following ProcedurePreprint
Fujisawa, I., Nobe, S., Seto, H., Onda, R., Uchida, Y., Ikoma, H., Chien, P.-C., & Kanai, R. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.03117 · Cited by 14
“Instruction followability is crucial across several key areas in AI, including reasoning (Yu et al., 2024), explainable AI (Arrieta et al., 2019), mitigating hallucinations (Bai et al., 2024), and AI alignment (Ji et al., 2023).”
BackgroundConformal Generative Modeling with Improved Sample Efficiency through Sequential Greedy FilteringPreprint
Kladny, K.-R., Schölkopf, B., & Muehlebach, M. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.01660 · Cited by 1
“A prime example is the phenomenon of “confabulations” (or “hallucintations”) in large language models—responses that lack factual support, potentially leading to substantial harm if trusted (Bai et al., 2024; Weidinger et al., 2021).”
CheckEmbed: Effective Verification of LLM Solutions to Open-Ended TasksPreprint
Besta, M., Paleari, L., Copik, M., Gerstenberger, R., Kubicek, A., Nyczyk, P., Iff, P., Schreiber, E., Srindran, T., Lehmann, T. M., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.02524 · Cited by 19
“The problem of hallucinations in LLMs has gathered significant attention [1, 13, 15, 39, 58].”
BackgroundRefineShot: Rethinking Cinematography Understanding with Foundational Skill Evaluation
Wu, H., Cai, Y.-J., Ge, H.-N., Chen, H.-K., Yang, M.-H., & Wang, Y.-W. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02423 · Cited by 13
“There are various design choices of MLLM (McK-inzie et al., 2024; Tong et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2025a) in vision encoders, feature alignment adapters, and datasets.”
InfluentialLanP: Rethinking the Impact of Language Priors in Large Vision-Language ModelsPreprint
Wu, Z., Niu, Y., Gao, H., Lin, H.-T., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Z., Shi, Q., Wang, Y., Fu, S., Xu, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.12359 · Cited by 18
“Despite advancements of LVLMs, similar to LLMs (Huang et al., 2023a; Ji et al., 2023), they also suffer from hallucination (Dai et al., 2023b), a phenomenon that LVLMs occasionally generate outputs that appear reasonable but are inconsistent with the actual visual content (Bai et al., 2024).”
Self-citationYu, Z., & Ananiadou, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.10950 · Cited by 25
“Basu et al. (2024) apply causal intervention methods to understand the information storage and transfer in MLLMs. Tong et al. (2024) study the shortcomings of the visual encoder CLIP.”
MRAMG-Bench: A BeyondText Benchmark for Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Generation
Yu, Q., Xiao, Z.-Y., Li, B., Wang, Z.-R., Chen, C., & Zhang, W.-T. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.04176 · Cited by 13
“Despite their advanced image comprehension capabilities, MLLMs frequently exhibit hallucinations when converting visual inputs into textual outputs [2], which raises a natural question: Why not present the images directly instead of describing their content?”
FACT: Failure-Aware Causal Training for World-Action ModelsPreprint
Peng, Q., Liang, Y., Yan, R., Hansen, N., & Wang, X. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.10232 · Cited by 11
“As a result, a bad action at test time can still be paired with a success-biased future [13, 14].”
When to Act, Ask, or Learn: Uncertainty-Aware Policy Steering
Yuan, J., Wu, Y.-L., & Bajcsy, A. (2026) · Robotics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.22474 · Cited by 12
“Even with perfect outcome narrations to choose from, VLMs are often overconfident evaluators [3, 18] which can undermine the quality of the policy steering.”
OmniDPO: A Preference Optimization Framework to Address Omni-Modal Hallucination
Chen, J., Zhang, T.-S., Huang, S.-Y., Niu, Y., Sun, C., Zhang, R.-Q., Zhou, G., Wen, L.-J., & Hu, X. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.00723 · Cited by 12
“Previous studies in the bimodal (text-image) setting have shown that the significantly stronger capability of text encoders compared to visual encoders results in dominant textual priors [4, 27].”
Hallucination at a Glance: Controlled Visual Edits and Fine-Grained Multimodal Learning
Bai, T.-Y., Fan, Y., Qiu, J.-T., Sun, F., Song, J.-Y., Han, J., Liu, Z.-C., He, C.-H., Zhang, W.-T., & Yuan, B.-H. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.07227 · Cited by 12
“…the distinctions that current models fail to capture—such as whether a tool is present, how many objects are in view, or the direction an object is facing—are trivial for humans, suggesting a fundamental mismatch between MLLM representations and the demands of fine-grained reasoning [4, 15].”
Fewer Hallucinations, More Verification: A Three-Stage LLM-Based Framework for ASR Error Correction
Fang, Y., Chen, B.-X., Peng, J., Li, X., Xi, Y., Zhang, C., & Zhong, G. (2025) · Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding · doi:10.1109/asru65441.2025.11434775 · Cited by 12
“Hallucinations in LLMs refer to instances where the generated responses, while grammatically correct, fluent, and plausible, deviate from the input or contradict factual information [21], [22].”
Bridging Information Asymmetry in Text-video Retrieval: A Data-centric ApproachPreprint
Bai, Z., Xiao, T., He, T., Wang, P., Zhang, Z., Brox, T., & Shou, M. Z. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.07249 · Cited by 8
“On the model side, a series of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) (Wu et al., 2023a; Bai et al., 2024), such as BLIP-2 (Li et al., 2023a), LLaVA (Liu et al., 2023), have been built based on LLMs, demonstrating remarkable performance on vision-language tasks (Wang et al., 2020; Bai et al.,…”
Self-citationYan, B., Zhang, J., Yuan, Z., Shan, S., & Chen, X. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.17115 · Cited by 19
“Despite their outstanding performance, LVLMs are significantly plagued by the issue of hallucination, i.e., generating content that appears plausible but contradicts the visual input [1]–[3].”
UniRAG: Universal Retrieval Augmentation for Large Vision Language Models
Sharifymoghaddam, S., Upadhyay, S. R., Chen, W., & Lin, J. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.108 · Cited by 23
MedThink: Inducing Medical Large-scale Visual Language Models to Hallucinate Less by Thinking More
Jiang, Y., Chen, J., Yang, D.-K., Li, M.-C., Wang, S.-L., Wu, T., Li, K., & Zhang, L.-H. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.11451 · Cited by 12
“∗ Corresponding authors. hallucinations [2, 10], which hinder their practical application in real-world medical scenarios.”
TerraScope: Pixel-Grounded Visual Reasoning for Earth Observation
Shu, Y., Ren, B., Xiong, Z., Zhu, X.-X., Demir, B., Sebe, N., & Rota, P. (2026) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.19039 · Cited by 11
WildVideo: Benchmarking LMMs for Understanding Video-Language Interaction
Yang, S., Yu, W., Yang, W., Liu, X., Tan, H., Lan, L., & Xiao, N. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3592831
“In comparison to LLMs, research [40], [41] on hallucinations in LMMs has primarily focused on the inconsistencies between the generated text responses and the provided visual content, i.e., cross-modal inconsistencies.”
TARAC: Mitigating Hallucination in LVLMs via Temporal Attention Real-time Accumulative Connection
Xie, C., Liu, T.-X., Jiang, L., Zeng, Y.-T., Guo, J.-R., Shen, Y., Huang, W.-Z., Li, J., & Xu, X. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.04099 · Cited by 11
“However, studies such as [7], [8] have highlighted the significant challenge of hallucination in even the most advanced LVLMs, which substantially restricts their potential for practical applications.”
Malik, H., Shamshad, F., Naseer, M., Nandakumar, K., Khan, F., & Khan, S. H. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.01576 · Cited by 11
“Recent studies have demonstrated MLLMs’ vulnerability to various adversarial attacks that can trigger hallucinations (Bai et al., 2024), enable jailbreaking (Jin et al., 2024), and induce model misuse (Niu et al., 2024), making their security critical for real-world applications (Liu et al., 2025;…”
Gu, J., Wang, Y., Cao, M., Bu, P., Song, J., He, Y.-C., Li, S.-L., & Zheng, B. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.14487 · Cited by 11
“Despite the advancements, the issue of “hallu-cination”, where the generated responses are not grounded in the input visual contexts, greatly impedes the reliability and practical deployment of LVLMs (Liu et al., 2024a; Bai et al., 2024).”
CompCap: Improving Multimodal Large Language Models with Composite Captions
Chen, X., Shukla, S. N., Azab, M., Singh, A., Wang, Q., Yang, D., Peng, S., Yu, H., Shen, Y., Zhang, X., et al. (2025) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.02189 · Cited by 8
“Such data are counterfactual and can help in model debiasing [64], thus mitigating hal-lucination caused by LLMs’ parametric knowledge [5].”
Words Over Pixels? Rethinking Vision in Multimodal Large Language Models
Jain, A., Mayank Vatsa, A., & Singh, R. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2025/1164 · Cited by 5
“Furthermore, weak vision models have been linked to hallucinations in MLLMs, as highlighted by [Bai et al. , 2024].”
From Denoising to Refining: A Corrective Framework for Vision-Language Diffusion ModelPreprint
Ji, Y., Wang, T., Ge, Y., Liu, Z., Yang, S., Shan, Y., & Luo, P. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.19871 · Cited by 8
“Despite their success, a persistent challenge in LVLMs is the phenomenon of hallucination (Bai et al., 2024), where the model generates text that is factually inconsistent with the visual input.”
Hallucination Benchmark for Speech Foundation Models
Koudounas, A., Quatra, M. L., Giollo, M., Siniscalchi, S. M., & Baralis, E. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.16567 · Cited by 10
“Hallucination errors are most commonly associated with Natural Language Generation (NLG) and Large Language Models (LLMs), where they involve generating false or fabricated content Huang et al. (2025); Bai et al. (2024).”
WISE: Weak-Supervision-Guided Step-by-Step Explanations for Multimodal LLMs in Image Classification
Jiang, Y.-W., Mehta, D., Yan, S.-Y., Shen, Y.-L., Wang, Z., & Ge, Z.-Y. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.17740 · Cited by 10
“Finally, the released MCoT dataset provides a practical benchmark for diverse vision tasks, including hallucination evaluation and mitigation (Bai et al., 2025), enabling systematic comparison of hallucination-reduction strategies and advancing reliable MLLM reasoning.”
Incentivizing Truthful Language Models via Peer Elicitation Games
Chen, B.-T., Zhu, T., Han, J.-L., Li, L.-X., Li, G., & Dai, X.-W. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.13636 · Cited by 10
“To address this question, a growing line of work has explored post-training alignment techniques, such as supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning with human feedback (Bai et al., 2024; Sun et al., 2024; Tonmoy et al., 2024).”
Do multimodal large language models understand welding?
Khvatskii, G., Lee, Y. S., Angst, C., Gibbs, M., Landers, R. G., & Chawla, N. V. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103121 · Cited by 12
“While the topic continues to be widely researched [2, 3, 4], existing research on large language model (LLM) hallucinations has mostly focused on object hallucinations, particularly in text [5], leaving some emerging questions understudied.”
CLIP-UP: CLIP-Based Unanswerable Problem Detection for Visual Question Answering
Vardi, B., Nir, O., & Shamir, A. (2026) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv61042.2026.00571 · Cited by 4
“This raises concerns about VLMs’ reliability and applicability, indicating the need for mitigating such hallucinations [5].”
XLM for Autonomous Driving Systems: A Comprehensive Review
Fourati, S., Jaafar, W., Baccar, N., & Alfattani, S. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.10484 · Cited by 10
“Recently, new approaches have been proposed to address hallucination from data, model, training, and inference [131].”
BackgroundLi, Z., Wu, X., Du, H., Liu, F., Nghiem, H. T., & Shi, G. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02189 · Cited by 195
“Extensive literature has explored inequities in LLM s and VLM s [15, 52].”
Nullu: Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via HalluSpace Projection
Yang, L., Zheng, Z., Chen, B., Zhao, Z., Lin, C., & Shen, C. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.01364 · Cited by 9
“Object Hallucination (OH) refers to the phenomenon where LVLMs generate text that, while semantically coherent, inaccurately represents the actual objects in the accompanying image [4, 20, 23, 26, 28].”
MATHGLANCE: Multimodal Large Language Models Do Not Know Where to Look in Mathematical Diagrams
Sun, Y.-P., Zhang, S., Tang, W., Chen, A.-T., Koniusz, P., Zou, K., Xue, Y., & van den Hengel, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.20745 · Cited by 9
“Perceptual misinterpretations propagate downstream, leading to faulty reasoning and frequent hallucinations, although the final answer may occasionally still be correct [13–15].”
MAD-Sherlock: Multi-Agent Debate for Visual Misinformation DetectionPreprint
Lakara, K., Channing, G., Rupprecht, C., Sock, J., Torr, P. H. S., Collomosse, J. P., & de Witt, C. S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.20140 · Cited by 21
“LMMs also suffer from hallucinations, misinterpret intent (Bai et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2024a), and lack up-to-date knowledge.”
Lau, G., Dao, H., Lin, N., & Low, K. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.24195 · Cited by 9
“While MLLMs’ hallucination and miscalibration problems are well known (Chen et al., 2025; Rohrbach et al., 2018; Bai et al., 2024), task instance-specific uncertainty quantification for MLLMs remains relatively underdeveloped.”
Dynamic Multimodal Activation Steering for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Vision-Language Models
Yin, J., Chen, Q., Chen, K.-D., Zhou, J., Wu, X.-J., & He, L. (2026) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.21704 · Cited by 9
“Recently, numerous approaches have been proposed to mitigate multimodal hallucinations (Liu et al., 2024b; Bai et al., 2024), addressing this issue across three key stages: training, inference, and post-processing.”
Liu, H., Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., Long, Y., Lai, Z., Yu, L., & Chen, Z. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.24314 · Cited by 9
“5-VL-72B (Bai et al., 2025a), prompted with zero-shot Chain-of-Thought (CoT); (2) Agent-based systems , including MDAgents (Kim et al., 2024), ReCon-cile (Chen et al., 2024), ColaCare (Wang et al., 2025b), and MedAgents (Tang et al., 2024).”
Wu, Z., Huang, H.-Y., & Wu, Y. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.15361 · Cited by 9
Protein Inverse Folding From Structure Feedback
Xu, J.-D., Gao, Z., Zhou, X., Hu, J., Cheng, X., Song, L., Chen, G.-Y., Heng, P.-A., & Qiu, J.-Z. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.03028 · Cited by 9
“They can also sometimes fail to follow instructions accurately [27, 5, 51, 49].”
Analyzing Fine-Grained Alignment and Enhancing Vision Understanding in Multimodal Language Models
Jiang, J.-C., Zhou, J.-X., Peng, B., Ning, X., & Zhu, Z.-H. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.17316 · Cited by 9
“…patch-level alignment abilities, while our P Patch Aligned significantly enhances these two aspects. this training paradigm, recent works [12, 13, 14, 15, 16] reveal that these MLLMs still struggle with region-specific understanding and tend to hallucinate with irrelevant or incorrect information.”
HyPerAlign: Interpretable Personalized LLM Alignment via Hypothesis GenerationPreprint
Gârbacea, C., & Tan, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.00038 · Cited by 11
“LLM hallucination is a broader well-known concern in the literature [8, 20, 32].”
Fei, H., Luo, M., Xu, J., Wu, S., Ji, W., Lee, M. L., & Hsu, W. (2024) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM Multimedia Workshop on Multi-modal Misinformation Governance in the Era of Foundation Models · doi:10.1145/3689090.3689388 · Cited by 6
“However, due to the generative nature of LLMs, current MLLMs often exhibit hal-lucinations—outputs that do not align with user intentions [1, 42].”
LongHalQA: Long-Context Hallucination Evaluation for MultiModal Large Language Models
Qiu, H., Huang, J., Gao, P., Qin, Q., Zhang, X.-Q., Shao, L., & Lu, S.-J. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.09962 · Cited by 9
“Despite the remarkable advancements, MLLMs often experience severe hallucination problems (Yin et al., 2023; Leng et al., 2023; Huang et al., 2023; Zhu et al., 2024; Yue et al., 2024; Bai et al., 2024) by generating textual responses that are not aligned with the corresponding image contents.”
BackgroundA Unified Hallucination Mitigation Framework for Large Vision-Language Models
Chang, Y., Jing, L., Zhang, X.-P., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.16494 · Cited by 9
“With the progress of research on LVLMs, the problem of hallucination has gradually been exposed (Bai et al., 2024), and it has attracted more and more attention.”
FIHA: Autonomous Hallucination Evaluation in Vision-Language Models with Davidson Scene GraphsPreprint
Yan, B., Zhang, Z., Jing, L., Hossain, E., & Du, X. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.13612 · Cited by 6
“For instance, in one case, a horse’s color is incorrectly identified as black when it is actually white or light gray.”
Self-citationKim, J., Kim, Y., & Ro, Y. M. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.626 · Cited by 16
“More recent hallucination survey compilation can be found in [Liu et al., 2024a; Bai et al., 2024b].”
Liang, Y., Cai, Z.-J., Xu, J., Huang, G.-B., Wang, Y., Liang, X., Liu, J.-H., Li, Z.-R., Wang, J., & Huang, S.-L. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/079017-3833 · Cited by 9
“…typically refers to “object hallucination,” where the models generate plausible outputs containing objects that are either absent from or mismatched with the images [15, 19, 24, 38, 50], and is commonly categorized into three types: category, attribute and relation hallucinations [3, 49].”
A Topic-level Self-Correctional Approach to Mitigate Hallucinations in MLLMs
He, L.-H., Chen, Z.-R., Shi, Z.-L., Yu, T.-Y., Shao, J., & Sheng, L. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.17265 · Cited by 9
“However, their tendency to produce hallucinations [9, 10, 11, 32], i.e. , generating responses that not factually grounded in the given image, undermines their reliability and practicality in real-world applications.”
Dastmalchi, H., An, A.-J., Cheraghian, A., & Barzamini, H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.10470 · Cited by 8
“Different studies have explored the roots of hallucination [4, 26], showing that it arises not only from the generative tendencies of LLMs but also from weak vision grounding, modality misalignment, biased training data, and context-blind decoding strategies.”
Losing the Plot: How VLM responses degrade on imperfect charts
Shin, P., Sampson, J., Narayanan, V., Márquez, A., & Halappanavar, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.18425 · Cited by 8
“Hallucination in Vision–Language Models (VLMs) has been widely surveyed [12, 13], with several approaches proposed to mitigate its effects [14, 15, 16].”
Mitigating Hallucinations in Multimodal LLMs via Object-aware Preference Optimization
Compagnoni, A., Caffagni, D., Moratelli, N., Baraldi, L., Cornia, M., & Cucchiara, R. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20181 · Cited by 8
“Recent research [2] identifies the root of hallucinations in noisy or corrupted training samples, eventually exacerbated by the addition of synthetic training data, as well as an imbalance in the frequency of certain entities appearing more often than others during optimization.”
Learning Interpretable Representations Leads to Semantically Faithful EEG-to-Text Generation
Liu, X., Shen, D., & Liu, X.-H. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.17099 · Cited by 8
“…in variational autoencoders (VAEs), posterior collapse can broadly account for hallucination in current multimodal models—many of which share structural traits such as encoder-decoder architecture, information capacity discrepancy between modalities, and powerful autoregressive decoders [24, 29].”
Mitigating Hallucination in VideoLLMs via Temporal-Aware Activation Engineering
Cai, J.-F., Zhou, W., Zhang, Z., Hong, J.-L., Zhan, N., & Li, H.-Q. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.12826 · Cited by 8
“Despite their impressive achievements, MLLMs are prone to severe hallucination issues [53, 69, 7, 67], where the model fails to correctly interpret input data and generates inaccurate or entirely fabricated responses.”
Self-citationPower grid inspection based on multimodal foundation models
Hao, J., & Tao, Y. (2025) · EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web · doi:10.4108/ew.9087 · Cited by 6
“As for multimodal LLMs, model output is sometimes inconsistent with corresponding visual input, which will present significant hurdles to practical implementation and raises concerns about reliability [25].”
Zhang, X., Peng, D., Zhang, Y. J., Guo, Z., Wu, C., Huang, J.-T., Chen, C., Ke, W., Meng, H. M. L., & Sun, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.12303 · Cited by 13
“In Figure 9, the results reveal that Chain-of-Description enables MLLMs to capture richer and more detailed visual information across all six dimensions, whereas captions generated by the base LLaVA-Qwen2-7B-UHD often include inaccuracies, e.g., hallucinations [91].”
LENS: Layers of Evaluation of Hallucination in GenAI Systems
Gu, C., Zhang, W., Huang, Z., Kou, J., Liu, Z., Zhao, C., Liu, C., Zhang, L., Lin, W., Wang, Z., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Universal Village (UV) · doi:10.1109/uv63228.2024.11189150 · Cited by 32
Self-citationFREAK: A Fine-grained Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Advanced MLLMsPreprint
Yin, Z., Liang, J., Wang, Y., Yao, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhao, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.19765 · Cited by 5
“…significant progress in image comprehension and depth reasoning (OpenAI, 2025; Zheng et al., 2025; Shen et al., 2025), existing MLLMs persistently suffer from multimodal hal-lucination (Bai et al., 2025), posing a critical gap for stable industrial deployment and everyday use (Magesh et al., 2024).”
SAVeS: Steering Safety Judgments in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Cues
Hinojosa, C., Grange, C., & Ghanem, B. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.19092 · Cited by 7
“Recent work on multimodal safety has primarily focused on improving refusal policies [8, 9] or detecting harmful instructions [10, 11].”
PostAlign: Multimodal Grounding as a Corrective Lens for MLLMs
Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., Torr, P., & Gu, J. (2025) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.17901 · Cited by 7
“One major issue caused by this bias is hallucination [8, 9], where the model generates content that does not exist in the image.”
VFaith: Do Large Multimodal Models Really Reason on Seen Images Rather than Previous Memories?
Yu, J., Zhan, Y.-F., Wu, Z.-H., Zhu, Y., Wang, J.-Q., & Qiu, M.-H. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.11571 · Cited by 7
“Previous reviews have categorized multimodal model hallucinations into three types: object category, object attribute, and object relation [1] , with our work primarily focusing on the latter two categories.”
Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, Q., Wu, J., Zhang, F., & Tan, T. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.17061 · Cited by 7
“However, despite their impressive versatility, LVLMs are confronted with a critical limitation known as “hallucination” (Zhou et al., 2023; Bai et al., 2024; Rawte et al., 2023; Huang et al., 2023), a phenomenon in which models generate text that appears semantically coherent, but contains content…”
Low-hallucination Synthetic Captions for Large-Scale Vision-Language Model Pre-trainingPreprint
Zhang, X., Zeng, Y., Huang, X., Hu, H., Xie, R., Hu, H., & Kang, Z. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.13123 · Cited by 7
“We adopt Qwen2-VL-7B [Wang et al., 2024] as the base model and use the LLaMA Factory [Zheng et al., 2024] platform to carry out the overall training process.”
InfluentialHuang, P.-H., Li, J.-L., Chen, C.-P., Chang, M., & Chen, W.-C. (2025) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00597 · Cited by 7
“Despite these efforts, modern LVLMs struggle with real-world challenges due to their notorious hallucinations [2, 22] jeopardizing downstream reliability and safety.”
Systematic Reward Gap Optimization for Mitigating VLM Hallucinations
He, L.-H., Chen, Z.-R., Shi, Z.-L., Yu, T.-Y., Shao, J., & Sheng, L. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/085713-3812 · Cited by 7
“However, their tendency to produce hallucinations [9, 10, 11, 32], i.e. , generating responses that not factually grounded in the given image, undermines their reliability and practicality in real-world applications.”
ODD-diLLMma: Driving Automation System ODD Compliance Checking using LLMs
Hildebrandt, C., Woodlief, T., & Elbaum, S. G. (2024) · IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent RObots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10801369 · Cited by 7
TrafficLens: Multi-Camera Traffic Video Analysis Using LLMs
Arefeen, M. A., Debnath, B., & Chakradhar, S. T. (2024) · 2024 IEEE 27th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc58415.2024.10920144 · Cited by 7
“To enhance efficiency in multi-camera traffic video analysis, merging overlapping information with unique details from each camera only once can significantly reduce the video-to-text conversion process.”
MMRel: Benchmarking Relation Understanding in Multi-Modal Large Language Models
Nie, J.-H., Zhang, G., An, W., Xing, Y., Tan, Y.-P., Kot, A.-C., & Lu, S.-J. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.09121 · Cited by 7
“However, recent studies [25], [31], [32], [33] reveal that most existing MLLMs tend to struggle in interpreting inter-object relations, as illustrated in Fig.”
Park, D., Qian, Z., Han, G., & Lim, S.-N. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.10492 · Cited by 20
“LVLMs are prone to hallucination issues as their output descriptions are often inconsistent with the input images and text instructions [16, 6, 5].”
BackgroundAdoptante, A. J. M., Castro, J. A. D. V., Medrana, M. L. B., Ocampo, A. P. B., Peramo, E. C., & Miranda, M. R. M. (2025) · Journal of Advances in Information Technology · doi:10.12720/jait.16.2.233-242 · Cited by 7
“Additionally, these linguistic complexities also increase the likelihood of hallucination, where the model generates plausible but factually incorrect or irrelevant responses [10].”
Wang, Z.-C., Yang, S., Peng, B., Tang, Z.-C., Li, Y., Dong, B., & Dong, J. (2026) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.07302 · Cited by 6
“However, they still suffer from object hallucination [4, 22, 27], i.e., generating objects that are not present in the image, undermining their reliability and practical use.”
Mirage Probes: How Vision Models Fake Visual Understanding
Ben-Levi, D., Goldfeder, J., Zhao, W.-L., Lapid, R., Levi, A., Roush, A. G., Shwartz-Ziv, R., & Lipson, H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.13870 · Cited by 6
“Tong et al. [2024] show that state-of-the-art VLMs frequently fail on visual questions that humans answer trivially.”
Boosting Faithful Multi-Modal LLMs via Complementary Visual Grounding
Fu, Z., Mao, Z.-D., Zhang, L., & Zhang, Y.-D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2025.3644140 · Cited by 6
“Despite achieving impressive performance across various multi-modal tasks, existing MLLMs are prone to hallucinations [15], where the model generates text that is factually inconsistent with the provided visual content, as shown in Figure 1(a).”
VGent: Visual Grounding via Modular Design for Disentangling Reasoning and Prediction
Kang, W., Kuen, J., Ren, M., Wei, Z.-J., Yan, Y., & Liu, K.-N. (2025) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.11099 · Cited by 6
“They also risk hallucinations [3, 14, 29], such as prematurely stopping before enumerating all target objects or entering endless generation loops in dense-object scenes [50].”
Nath, S., Basu, A., Dasgupta, S., & Das, S. (2025) · Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing · doi:10.1145/3774521.3774542 · Cited by 7
“Object hallucination can be further categorized into three types: object category, object attribute (color, shape, or counting), and object relation (human-object interactions or relative positions) [4, 31].”
Med-VRAgent: A Framework for Medical Visual Reasoning-Enhanced Agents
Guo, G.-F., Lu, X.-Q., & Feng, Y. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.939 · Cited by 6
“This issue is exacerbated by the factual unreliability of underlying large language models (LLMs) (Huang et al., 2025; Zhu et al., 2024b; Pal et al., 2023), highlighting the urgent need for effective mitigation strategies (Kim et al., 2025; Bai et al., 2025).”
Beyond Textual CoT: Interleaved Text-Image Chains with Deep Confidence Reasoning for Image Editing
Zou, Z.-T., Yue, Z.-R., Du, K.-P., Bao, B.-L., Li, H.-T., Xie, H.-Z., Xu, G.-Z., Zhou, Y., Wang, Y.-L., Hu, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.08157 · Cited by 6
“…the quality of intermediate steps is critical, as the inherent randomness of diffusion models (Zhang et al., 2023a) and the hallucination phenomenon of large language models (LLMs) (Zhang et al., 2025b; Bai et al., 2024) inevitably introduce low-quality elements that can degrade the final result.”
Abortion AI: Toward an equity-centered research agenda for AI and abortion
Friend, J., Brindis, C. D., & Upadhyay, U. D. (2025) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111241 · Cited by 8
Wang, X., Cui, Y., Yao, X., Wang, S., Hu, G., & Qin, X. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.17481 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Bai, Z., Wang, P., Xiao, T., He, T., Han, Z., Zhang, Z., & Shou, M. Z.
- ORCID
- Han, Zongbo
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2404.18930
- OpenAlex
- W6922346929
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 194
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation
- National Research Foundation Singapore
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- hallucinations, multimodal large language models, hallucination mitigation, hallucination detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review