Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Prediction
Open accessAbstract
Large language models such as GPT and Llama are trained with a next-token prediction loss. In this work, we suggest that training language models to predict multiple future tokens at once results in higher sample efficiency. More specifically, at each position in the training corpus, we ask the model to predict the following n tokens using n independent output heads, operating on top of a shared model trunk. Considering multi-token prediction as an auxiliary training task, we measure improved downstream capabilities with no overhead in training time for both code and natural language models. The method is increasingly useful for larger model sizes, and keeps its appeal when training for multiple epochs. Gains are especially pronounced on generative benchmarks like coding, where our models consistently outperform strong baselines by several percentage points. Our 13B parameter models solves 12 % more problems on HumanEval and 17 % more on MBPP than comparable next-token models. Experiments on small algorithmic tasks demonstrate that multi-token prediction is favorable for the development of induction heads and algorithmic reasoning capabilities. As an additional benefit, models trained with 4-token prediction are up to 3 times faster at inference, even with large batch sizes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Jacob Austin, Augustus Odena, Maxwell Nye, Maarten Bosma, Henryk Michalewski, David Dohan, Ellen Jiang, Carrie Cai, Michael Terry, Quoc Le, et al. Program synthesis with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07732, 2021. · arXiv
- Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Hen- rique Ponde, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yura Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374, 2021. · arXiv
- Nakhun Chumpolsathien. Using knowledge distillation from keyword extraction to improve the informativeness of neu- ral cross-lingual summarization. Master's thesis, Beijing Institute of Technology, 2020.
- Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, et al. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168, 2021. · arXiv
- Li Dong, Nan Yang, Wenhui Wang, Furu Wei, Xiaodong Liu, Yu Wang, Jianfeng Gao, Ming Zhou, and Hsiao-Wuen Hon. Unified language model pre-training for natural lan- guage understanding and generation. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 13063-13075, 2019.
- Alexandre Défossez, Jade Copet, Gabriel Synnaeve, and Yossi Adi. High fidelity neural audio compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.13438, 2022. · arXiv
- Mehrdad Farahani, Mohammad Gharachorloo, and Moham- mad Manthouri. Leveraging parsbert and pretrained mt5 for persian abstractive text summarization. In 2021 26th International Computer Conference, Computer Society of Iran (CSICC). IEEE, March 2021. doi: 10.1109/ csicc52343.2021.9420563. URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1109/CSICC52343.2021.9420563. · DOI
- Bogdan Gliwa, Iwona Mochol, Maciej Biesek, and Alek- sander Wawer. Samsum corpus: A human-annotated dialogue dataset for abstractive summarization. In Pro- ceedings of the 2nd Workshop on New Frontiers in Summarization. Association for Computational Linguis- tics, 2019. doi: 10.18653/v1/d19-5409. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-5409. · DOI · Paper page
- Dan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Saurav Kadavath, Mantas Mazeika, Akul Arora, Ethan Guo, Collin Burns, Samir Puranik, Horace He, Dawn Song, et al. Measuring cod- ing challenge competence with apps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.09938, 2021. · arXiv
- Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. ICLR, 2015.
- Ryan Koo, Minhwa Lee, Vipul Raheja, Jong Inn Park, Zae Myung Kim, and Dongyeop Kang. Benchmarking cognitive biases in large language models as evaluators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17012, 2023. · arXiv
- Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Redfield, Michael Collins, Ankur Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Matthew Kelcey, Jacob Devlin, Kenton Lee, Kristina N. Toutanova, Llion Jones, Ming- Wei Chang, Andrew Dai, Jakob Uszkoreit, Quoc Le, and Slav Petrov. Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association of Computational Linguistics, 2019.
- Yann LeCun. A path towards autonomous machine intelli- gence version 0.9. 2, 2022-06-27. Open Review, 62(1), 2022.
- Yujia Li, David Choi, Junyoung Chung, Nate Kush- man, Julian Schrittwieser, Rémi Leblond, Tom Eccles, James Keeling, Felix Gimeno, Agustin Dal Lago, et al. Competition-level code generation with alphacode. Sci- ence, 378(6624):1092-1097, 2022.
- Chin-Yew Lin. ROUGE: A package for automatic evalu- ation of summaries. In Text Summarization Branches Out, pages 74-81, Barcelona, Spain, July 2004. Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics. URL https: //aclanthology.org/W04-1013.
- Jesse Read, Bernhard Pfahringer, Geoffrey Holmes, and Eibe Frank. Classifier chains: A review and perspectives. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70:683-718, 2021.
- Melissa Roemmele, Cosmin Adrian Bejan, and Andrew S Gordon. Choice of plausible alternatives: An evaluation of commonsense causal reasoning. In 2011 AAAI Spring Symposium Series, 2011.
- David Silver, Aja Huang, Chris J Maddison, Arthur Guez, Laurent Sifre, George Van Den Driessche, Julian Schrit- twieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Veda Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, et al. Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. nature, 529(7587): 484-489, 2016.
- Aaditya K Singh, Stephanie CY Chan, Ted Moskovitz, Erin Grant, Andrew M Saxe, and Felix Hill. The transient nature of emergent in-context learning in transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08360, 2023. · arXiv
- Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, Vinh Q Tran, Xavier Gar- cia, Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Hyung Won Chung, Sia- mak Shakeri, Dara Bahri, Tal Schuster, et al. Ul2: Unifying language learning paradigms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05131, 2022. · arXiv
- Vladimir Vapnik and Akshay Vashist. A new learning paradigm: Learning using privileged information. Neural networks, 22(5-6):544-557, 2009.
- Vikas Yadav, Steven Bethard, and Mihai Surdeanu. Quick and (not so) dirty: Unsupervised selection of justifica- tion sentences for multi-hop question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.07176, 2019. · arXiv
- Zhilin Yang, Zihang Dai, Yiming Yang, Jaime Carbonell, Russ R Salakhutdinov, and Quoc V Le. Xlnet: Gen- eralized autoregressive pretraining for language under- standing. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 5753-5763, 2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space
Hao, S., Sukhbaatar, S., Su, D., Li, X., Hu, Z., Weston, J., & Tian, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.06769 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“This is related to the findings of Gloeckle et al. (2024), where they propose multi-token prediction as a new pretraining objective to improve the LLM’s ability to plan ahead.”
Transformers Represent Belief State Geometry in their Residual Stream
Shai, A., Marzen, S., Teixeira, L., Oldenziel, A., & Riechers, P. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-2387 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
MiMo: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of Language Model - From Pretraining to Posttraining
Xiaomi, L.-C., :, Xia, B., Shen, B., Cici, Zhu, D., Zhang, D., Wang, G., Zhang, H., Liu, H., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.07608 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Then, with the main model and first MTP layer frozen, we fine-tune two new MTP layers for inference speedup.”
InfluentialTransformers represent belief state geometry in their residual stream
Shai, A. S., Marzen, S. E., Teixeira, L., Oldenziel, A. G., & Riechers, P. M. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kong, Z., Li, Y., Zeng, F., Xin, L., Messica, S., Lin, X., Zhao, P., Kellis, M., Tang, H., & Zitnik, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18227
“One direction is to alter the generation paradigm itself, for example, training language models to predict multiple tokens per step [40].”
MiMo-V2.6: Scaling Reinforcement Learning Towards Self-Improvement
Core Team, Qiao, Z., Hua, Z., Ou, Z., Yue, Z., Jiang, Z., Huang, Z., Chen, Z., Zheng, Z., Xu, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.11959
“6 also integrates an SWA and dense FFN based MTP (Gloeckle et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2024; Xia et al., 2025) to improve model performance during pre-training.”
- Authors
- Gloeckle, F., Idrissi, B. Y., Rozière, B., Lopez-Paz, D., & Synnaeve, G.
- Affiliations
- École nationale des ponts et chaussées (FR)
- Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2404.19737
- OpenAlex
- W4396821494
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- multi-token prediction, next-token prediction, large language models, sample efficiency, code generation, algorithmic reasoning, induction heads, inference speed, HumanEval, MBPP
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review