PreprintCited by 8Teleoperation and Haptic SystemsRobot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in Robotics

ALOHA 2: An Enhanced Low-Cost Hardware for Bimanual Teleoperation

Open access
ALOHA 2 Team, Aldaco, Jorge, Armstrong, Travis, Baruch, Robert, Bingham, Jeff, Chan, Sanky, Draper, Kenneth, Dwibedi, Debidatta +18 more·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Diverse demonstration datasets have powered significant advances in robot learning, but the dexterity and scale of such data can be limited by the hardware cost, the hardware robustness, and the ease of teleoperation. We introduce ALOHA 2, an enhanced version of ALOHA that has greater performance, ergonomics, and robustness compared to the original design. To accelerate research in large-scale bimanual manipulation, we open source all hardware designs of ALOHA 2 with a detailed tutorial, together with a MuJoCo model of ALOHA 2 with system identification. See the project website at aloha-2.github.io.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2405.02292

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A standard ALOHA 2 cell is initialized with an arm on each side of a 0.8m by 0.4m table.

    “A standard ALOHA 2 cell (Team et al., 2024; Zhao et al., 2025) is initialized with an arm on each side of a 0.8m by 0.4m table.”

    From Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World (2025) · cites this paper as Team et al., 2024

    The ALOHA 2 section (p. 2) describes a bimanual workcell with two follower arms, supporting the two-arm aspect of the claim. It specifies a 48 × 30-inch table (approximately 1.22 × 0.76 m), not a 0.8 × 0.4 m table; the passage does not explicitly say an arm is placed on each side. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ALOHA 2 Team, Aldaco, J., Armstrong, T., Baruch, R., Bingham, J., Chan, S., Draper, K., Dwibedi, D., Finn, C., Florence, P., Goodrich, S., Gramlich, W., Hage, T., Herzog, A., Hoech, J., Nguyen, T., Storz, I., Tabanpour, B., Takayama, L., Tompson, J., Wahid, A., Wahrburg, T., Xu, S., Yaroshenko, S., Zakka, K., & Zhao, T. Z.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396786887
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
bimanual teleoperation, low-cost robot hardware, bimanual manipulation, system identification, robot dexterity, robot robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review