The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Beyond Prompts: Learning from Human Communication for Enhanced AI Intent Alignment
Open accessAbstract
AI intent alignment, ensuring that AI produces outcomes as intended by users, is a critical challenge in human-AI interaction. The emergence of generative AI, including LLMs, has intensified the significance of this problem, as interactions increasingly involve users specifying desired results for AI systems. In order to support better AI intent alignment, we aim to explore human strategies for intent specification in human-human communication. By studying and comparing human-human and human-LLM communication, we identify key strategies that can be applied to the design of AI systems that are more effective at understanding and aligning with user intent. This study aims to advance toward a human-centered AI system by bringing together human communication strategies for the design of AI systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intent misalignment occurs when the AI fails to understand the user's intent or motivation, and is one of the common sources of user dissatisfaction.
“Second, intent misalignment occur when the AI fails to understand the user's intent or motivation, and is one of the common sources of user dissatisfaction [34, 76].”
From LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation
Laban, P., Hayashi, H., Zhou, Y., & Neville, J. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, Y., Son, K., Kim, S., & Kim, J.
- Affiliations
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2405.05678
- OpenAlex
- W4396822308
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (2019-0-00075)
- Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (2019-0-00075, No.2019-0-00075, 2021-0-01347)
- Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (2019-0-00075)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- human-AI interaction, human-to-human communication, large language models, prompt engineering, human-centered AI, user intent understanding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
