PreprintCited by 31Authorship Attribution and ProfilingDigital Media Forensic DetectionTopic Modeling

Large Language Model (LLM) AI text generation detection based on transformer deep learning algorithm

Open access
Mo, Yuhong, Qin, Hao, Dong, Yushan, Zhu, Ziyi, Li, Zhenglin·2024·arXiv

Abstract

In this paper, a tool for detecting LLM AI text generation is developed based on the Transformer model, aiming to improve the accuracy of AI text generation detection and provide reference for subsequent research. Firstly the text is Unicode normalised, converted to lowercase form, characters other than non-alphabetic characters and punctuation marks are removed by regular expressions, spaces are added around punctuation marks, first and last spaces are removed, consecutive ellipses are replaced with single spaces and the text is connected using the specified delimiter. Next remove non-alphabetic characters and extra whitespace characters, replace multiple consecutive whitespace characters with a single space and again convert to lowercase form. The deep learning model combines layers such as LSTM, Transformer and CNN for text classification or sequence labelling tasks. The training and validation sets show that the model loss decreases from 0.127 to 0.005 and accuracy increases from 94.96 to 99.8, indicating that the model has good detection and classification ability for AI generated text. The test set confusion matrix and accuracy show that the model has 99% prediction accuracy for AI-generated text, with a precision of 0.99, a recall of 1, and an f1 score of 0.99, achieving a very high classification accuracy. Looking forward, it has the prospect of wide application in the field of AI text detection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2405.06652

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Operating system caching systems such as Linux page cache and ZFS ARC are built for uniform cache-line sizes and cannot handle the varying computational costs of different-length KV cache misses in LLMs.

    “Operating system caching systems, like Linux page cache [38] and ZFS ARC [40], are optimized for uniform cache-line sizes, failing to address the variable computational costs of different-length KV cache misses in LLMs.”

    From HotPrefix: Hotness-Aware KV Cache Scheduling for Efficient Prefix Sharing in LLM Inference Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Introduction describes detecting AI-generated text, and the Method describes a transformer-based text classifier. Searches for Linux page cache, ZFS ARC, KV-cache misses, and variable recomputation costs found no passage addressing the caching claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 31

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Meng, Yinan, et al. "Spring-IMU Fusion-Based Proprioception for Feedback Control of Soft Manipulators." IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics (2023).
  2. Mu, Pengyu, Wenhao Zhang, and Yuhong Mo. "Research on spatio-temporal patterns of traffic operation index hotspots based on big data mining technology." Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. Vol. 128. 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA: WILEY, 2021.
  3. ImaniGooghari, Ayyoob, et al. "Glot500: Scaling multilingual corpora and language models to 500 languages." ar**v preprint ar**v:2305.12182 (2023).
  4. Bernacki, Bruce E., Timothy J. Johnson, and Tanya L. Myers. "Modeling thin layers of analytes on substrates for spectral analysis: use of solid/liquid n and k values to model reflectance spectra." Optical Engineering 59.9 (2020): 092005-092005.
  5. Szabó, Ferenc János. "Comparison of Programming Ansys and COSMOS/M Finite Element Systems." DESIGN OF MACHINES AND STRUCTURES: A PUBLICATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISKOLC 12.2 (2022): 110-119.
  6. Aristantia, Dita Wahyuni, et al. "Learning Model of Arabic in Indonesia: A Study of The Curriculum System at Bahrul Ulum Tambakberas Islamic Boarding School, Jombang and an-Nuqayah, Madura." Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan 8.1 (2024): 485-499.
  7. Beniwal, Mohit, Archana Singh, and Nand Kumar. "Forecasting long-term stock prices of global indices: A forward-validating Genetic Algorithm optimization approach for Support Vector Regression." Applied Soft Computing 145 (2023): 110566.
  8. Burruel Stone, Theresa. "Socializing Latinx college-going youth to (White) Neutral Rationality: Liberal teaching practices and right-wing racisms." International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (2024): 1-17.

Authors
Mo, Y., Qin, H., Dong, Y., Zhu, Z., & Li, Z.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396912870
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 23
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
AI-generated text detection, large language models, transformer models, text classification, text preprocessing, LSTM, convolutional neural networks, hybrid deep learning model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review