CheXpert Plus: Augmenting a Large Chest X-ray Dataset with Text Radiology Reports, Patient Demographics and Additional Image Formats
Open accessAbstract
Since the release of the original CheXpert paper five years ago, CheXpert has become one of the most widely used and cited clinical AI datasets. The emergence of vision language models has sparked an increase in demands for sharing reports linked to CheXpert images, along with a growing interest among AI fairness researchers in obtaining demographic data. To address this, CheXpert Plus serves as a new collection of radiology data sources, made publicly available to enhance the scaling, performance, robustness, and fairness of models for all subsequent machine learning tasks in the field of radiology. CheXpert Plus is the largest text dataset publicly released in radiology, with a total of 36 million text tokens, including 13 million impression tokens. To the best of our knowledge, it represents the largest text de-identification effort in radiology, with almost 1 million PHI spans anonymized. It is only the second time that a large-scale English paired dataset has been released in radiology, thereby enabling, for the first time, cross-institution training at scale. All reports are paired with high-quality images in DICOM format, along with numerous image and patient metadata covering various clinical and socio-economic groups, as well as many pathology labels and RadGraph annotations. We hope this dataset will boost research for AI models that can further assist radiologists and help improve medical care. Data is available at the following URL: https://stanfordaimi.azurewebsites.net/datasets/5158c524-d3ab-4e02-96e9-6ee9efc110a1 Models are available at the following URL: https://github.com/Stanford-AIMI/chexpert-plus
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The model was tested on held-out subsets of MIMIC-CXR, CheXpert (n=61), Open-I (n=2163), and US-CXR (n=1757).
“the model is tested not only on a held-out subset of the MIMIC-CXR dataset, but also on a held-out subset of the CheXpert (n = 61)59, Open-I (n = 2163)35, and US-CXR (n = 1757) datasets.”
From A clinically accessible small multimodal radiology model and evaluation metric for chest X-ray findings (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zambrano Chaves, J. M., Huang, S.-C., Xu, Y., Xu, H., Usuyama, N., Zhang, S., Wang, F., Xie, Y., Khademi, M., Yang, Z., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58344-x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationAbdaoui, H., Barbaria, S., Al Kuwaiti, A., Raouafi, N., Ben Salah, R., & Boussi Rahmouni, H. (2026) · Frontiers in Radiology · doi:10.3389/fradi.2026.1875905
- Authors
- Chambon, P., Delbrouck, J.-B., Sounack, T., Huang, S.-C., Chen, Z., Varma, M., Truong, S. Q., Chuong, C. T., & Langlotz, C. P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2405.19538
- OpenAlex
- W4399251815
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
- Keywords
- chest radiography, radiology reports, patient demographics, algorithmic fairness, vision-language models, DICOM images, clinical AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review