The DOI matches its DataCite record.
HYDRA: Model Factorization Framework for Black-Box LLM Personalization
Open accessAbstract
Personalization has emerged as a critical research area in modern intelligent systems, focusing on mining users' behavioral history and adapting to their preferences for delivering tailored experiences. Despite the remarkable few-shot capabilities exhibited by black-box large language models (LLMs), the inherent opacity of their model parameters presents significant challenges in aligning the generated output with individual expectations. Existing solutions have primarily focused on prompt design to incorporate user-specific profiles and behaviors; however, such approaches often struggle to generalize effectively due to their inability to capture shared knowledge among all users. To address these challenges, we propose HYDRA, a model factorization framework that captures both user-specific behavior patterns from historical data and shared general knowledge among all users to deliver personalized generation. In order to capture user-specific behavior patterns, we first train a reranker to prioritize the most useful information from top-retrieved relevant historical records. By combining the prioritized history with the corresponding query, we train an adapter to align the output with individual user-specific preferences, eliminating the reliance on access to inherent model parameters of black-box LLMs. Both the reranker and the adapter can be decomposed into a base model with multiple user-specific heads, resembling a hydra. The base model maintains shared knowledge across users, while the multiple personal heads capture user-specific preferences. Experimental results demonstrate that HYDRA outperforms existing state-of-the-art prompt-based methods by an average relative improvement of 9.01% across five diverse personalization tasks in the LaMP benchmark. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/night-chen/HYDRA.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, their effectiveness is constrained by their ability to tailor responses to human preferences and behaviors via personalization.”
From On the Way to LLM Personalization: Learning to Remember User Conversations (2024) · cites this paper as Zhuang et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“However, a common challenge of these techniques is the reliance on prompt tuning and the selection of relevant data points (Zhuang et al., 2024).”
From On the Way to LLM Personalization: Learning to Remember User Conversations (2024) · cites this paper as Zhuang et al., 2024
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the Way to LLM Personalization: Learning to Remember User Conversations
Magister, L. C., Metcalf, K., Zhang, Y., & ter Hoeve, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.13405 · Cited by 6
“The second stage focuses on training via PEFT with a custom loss function.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhuang, Y., Sun, H., Yu, Y., Qiang, R., Wang, Q., Zhang, C., & Dai, B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 100783-100815
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2406.02888
- OpenAlex
- W4415796088
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2008334, 2403240, 2144338, 2106961, CAREER)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- large language models, personalized language models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HYDRA: Model Factorization Framework for Black-Box LLM Personalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2406.02888
- The paper
- Zhuang, Y., Sun, H., Yu, Y., Qiang, R., Wang, Q., Zhang, C., & Dai, B. (2024). HYDRA: Model Factorization Framework for Black-Box LLM Personalization. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2406.02888