PreprintCited by 0Authorship Attribution and ProfilingDigital Media Forensic DetectionNatural Language Processing Techniques

Towards Reliable Detection of LLM-Generated Texts: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework with CUDRT

Open access
Tao, Zhen, Chen, Yanfang, Xi, Dinghao, Li, Zhiyu, Xu, Wei·2024·arXiv

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of large language models (LLMs) has significantly advanced text generation, but the human-like quality of LLM outputs presents major challenges in reliably distinguishing between human-authored and LLM-generated texts. Existing detection benchmarks are constrained by their reliance on static datasets, scenario-specific tasks (e.g., question answering and text refinement), and a primary focus on English, overlooking the diverse linguistic and operational subtleties of LLMs. To address these gaps, we propose CUDRT, a comprehensive evaluation framework and bilingual benchmark in Chinese and English, categorizing LLM activities into five key operations: Create, Update, Delete, Rewrite, and Translate. CUDRT provides extensive datasets tailored to each operation, featuring outputs from state-of-the-art LLMs to assess the reliability of LLM-generated text detectors. This framework supports scalable, reproducible experiments and enables in-depth analysis of how operational diversity, multilingual training sets, and LLM architectures influence detection performance. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the framework's capacity to optimize detection systems, providing critical insights to enhance reliability, cross-linguistic adaptability, and detection accuracy. By advancing robust methodologies for identifying LLM-generated texts, this work contributes to the development of intelligent systems capable of meeting real-world multilingual detection challenges. Source code and dataset are available at GitHub.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2406.09056

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing detection methods are mostly binary classifiers and cannot distinguish complex LLM-generated content such as mixed human-LLM input.

    “current methods often focus on binary classification, failing to address the complexities of realworld scenarios like human-LLM collaboration.”

    From Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurement (2025) · cites this paper as [50]

    Section 2.2 describes model-based detectors classifying texts using human- and LLM-generated examples. Section 3.4.1 says LLM text is often interspersed with human text and that this raises detection requirements. The paper supports the concern about mixed content, but does not establish that current methods generally fail to address human–LLM collaboration. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023). · arXiv
  2. Shuroug A Alowais, Sahar S Alghamdi, Nada Alsuhebany, Tariq Alqahtani, Abdulrahman I Alshaya, Sumaya N Almohareb, Atheer Aldairem, Mohammed Alrashed, Khalid Bin Saleh, Hisham A Badreldin, et al. 2023. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC medical education 23, 1 (2023), 689.
  3. Hossein Bahak, Farzaneh Taheri, Zahra Zojaji, and Arefeh Kazemi. 2023. Evaluating ChatGPT as a Question Answering System: A Comprehensive Analysis and Comparison with Existing Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.07592 (2023). · arXiv
  4. Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, et al. 2023. Qwen technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609 (2023). · arXiv
  5. Yushi Bai, Jiahao Ying, Yixin Cao, Xin Lv, Yuze He, Xiaozhi Wang, Jifan Yu, Kaisheng Zeng, Yijia Xiao, Haozhe Lyu, et al. 2024. Benchmarking foundation models with language-model-as-an-examiner. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024).
  6. Yupeng Chang, Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu, Linyi Yang, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, Xiaoyuan Yi, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang, et al. 2024. A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 15, 3 (2024), 1-45.
  7. Yufan Chen, Arjun Arunasalam, and Z Berkay Celik. 2023. Can large language models provide security & privacy advice? measuring the ability of llms to refute misconceptions. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. 366-378.
  8. Jan Clusmann, Fiona R Kolbinger, Hannah Sophie Muti, Zunamys I Carrero, Jan-Niklas Eckardt, Narmin Ghaffari Laleh, Chiara Maria Lavinia Löffler, Sophie-Caroline Schwarzkopf, Michaela Unger, Gregory P Veldhuizen, et al. 2023. The future landscape of large language models in medicine. Communications medicine 3, 1 (2023), 141.
  9. Zhengxiao Du, Yujie Qian, Xiao Liu, Ming Ding, Jiezhong Qiu, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. 2022. GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infilling. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, 320-335.
  10. Sebastian Gehrmann, Hendrik Strobelt, and Alexander Rush. 2019. GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Text. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. Association for Computational Linguistics, 111-116.
  11. Bin Guo, Hao Wang, Yasan Ding, Wei Wu, Shaoyang Hao, Yueqi Sun, and Zhiwen Yu. 2021. Conditional text generation for harmonious human-machine interaction. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 12, 2 (2021), 1-50.
  12. Biyang Guo, Xin Zhang, Ziyuan Wang, Minqi Jiang, Jinran Nie, Yuxuan Ding, Jianwei Yue, and Yupeng Wu. 2023. How close is chatgpt to human experts? comparison corpus, evaluation, and detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07597 (2023). · arXiv
  13. Tianxing He, Jingyu Zhang, Tianle Wang, Sachin Kumar, Kyunghyun Cho, James Glass, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2023. On the Blind Spots of Model-Based Evaluation Metrics for Text Generation. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 12067-12097.
  14. Xinlei He, Xinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes, and Yang Zhang. 2023. Mgtbench: Benchmarking machine- generated text detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14822 (2023). · arXiv
  15. Amanda Heidt. 2023. Artificial-intelligence search engines wrangle academic literature. Nature 620, 7973 (2023), 456-457.
  16. Yang Hu, Adriane Chapman, Guihua Wen, and Dame Wendy Hall. 2022. What can knowledge bring to machine learning?-a survey of low-shot learning for structured data. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 13, 3 (2022), 1-45.
  17. Jean Kaddour, Joshua Harris, Maximilian Mozes, Herbie Bradley, Roberta Raileanu, and Robert McHardy. 2023. Challenges and applications of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10169 (2023). · arXiv
  18. Mohamad Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh and Yusra jadallah abed Khasawneh. 2023. The Roles Of Formulaic Sequences And Discourse Markers In Academic Writing; Insights From Lecturers And Other Researchers. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture 34 (2023), 7102-7122.
  19. Zhenyu Li, Sunqi Fan, Yu Gu, Xiuxing Li, Zhichao Duan, Bowen Dong, Ning Liu, and Jianyong Wang. 2024. Flexkbqa: A flexible llm-powered framework for few-shot knowledge base question answering. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 18608-18616.
  20. Xun Liang, Shichao Song, Simin Niu, Zhiyu Li, Feiyu Xiong, Bo Tang, Yezhaohui Wang, Dawei He, Cheng Peng, Zhonghao Wang, and Haiying Deng. 2024. UHGEval: Benchmarking the Hallucination of Chinese Large Language Models via Unconstrained Generation. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, 5266-5293.
  21. Guangyuan Liu, Hongyang Du, Dusit Niyato, Jiawen Kang, Zehui Xiong, Dong In Kim, and Xuemin Shen. 2024. Semantic communications for artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC) toward effective content creation. IEEE Network (2024).
  22. Xiaoming Liu, Zhaohan Zhang, Yichen Wang, Hang Pu, Yu Lan, and Chao Shen. 2023. CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Low Resource With Contrastive Learning. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 16167- 16188.
  23. Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 (2019). · arXiv
  24. Dominik Macko, Robert Moro, Adaku Uchendu, Jason Lucas, Michiharu Yamashita, Matúš Pikuliak, Ivan Srba, Thai Le, Dongwon Lee, Jakub Simko, and Maria Bielikova. 2023. MULTITuDE: Large-Scale Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection Benchmark. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 9960-9987.
  25. Lev Manovich. 2002. The language of new media. MIT press.
  26. Ggaliwango Marvin, Nakayiza Hellen, Daudi Jjingo, and Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende. 2023. Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models. International Conference on Data Intelligence and Cognitive Informatics, 387-402.
  27. Eric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D Manning, and Chelsea Finn. 2023. Detectgpt: Zero- shot machine-generated text detection using probability curvature. International Conference on Machine Learning, 24950-24962.
  28. Daye Nam, Andrew Macvean, Vincent Hellendoorn, Bogdan Vasilescu, and Brad Myers. 2024. Using an llm to help with code understanding. Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering, 1-13.
  29. Jinjie Ni, Tom Young, Vlad Pandelea, Fuzhao Xue, and Erik Cambria. 2023. Recent advances in deep learning based dialogue systems: A systematic survey. Artificial intelligence review 56, 4 (2023), 3055-3155.
  30. Xinlin Peng, Ying Zhou, Ben He, Le Sun, and Yingfei Sun. 2024. Hidding the Ghostwriters: An Adversarial Evaluation of AI-Generated Student Essay Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00412 (2024). · arXiv
  31. Thorsten Pröhl, Erik Putzier, and Rüdiger Zarnekow. 2024. Benchmarking of LLM Detection: Comparing Two Competing Approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11670 (2024). · arXiv
  32. Raphael Rouf, Mohammadreza Rasolroveicy, Marin Litoiu, Seema Nagar, Prateeti Mohapatra, Pranjal Gupta, and Ian Watts. 2024. InstantOps: A Joint Approach to System Failure Prediction and Root Cause Identification in Microserivces Cloud-Native Applications. Proceedings of the 15th ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering, 119-129.
  33. Paria Sarzaeim, Arya Doshi, and Qusay Mahmoud. 2023. A Framework for Detecting AI-Generated Text in Research Publications. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Technologies, 121-127.
  34. Yucheng Shi, Hehuan Ma, Wenliang Zhong, Qiaoyu Tan, Gengchen Mai, Xiang Li, Tianming Liu, and Junzhou Huang. 2023. Chatgraph: Interpretable text classification by converting chatgpt knowledge to graphs. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), 515-520.
  35. Lei Shu, Liangchen Luo, Jayakumar Hoskere, Yun Zhu, Yinxiao Liu, Simon Tong, Jindong Chen, and Lei Meng. 2024. Rewritelm: An instruction-tuned large language model for text rewriting. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 18970-18980.
  36. Chris Stokel-Walker and Richard Van Noorden. 2023. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature 614, 7947 (2023), 214-216.
  37. Jinyan Su, Terry Zhuo, Di Wang, and Preslav Nakov. 2023. DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero- Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. Association for Computational Linguistics, 12395-12412.
  38. Zhenpeng Su, Xing Wu, Wei Zhou, Guangyuan Ma, and Songlin Hu. 2023. Hc3 plus: A semantic-invariant human chatgpt comparison corpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.02731 (2023). · arXiv
  39. Yuchuan Tian, Hanting Chen, Xutao Wang, Zheyuan Bai, Qinghua Zhang, Ruifeng Li, Chao Xu, and Yunhe Wang. 2023. Multiscale positive-unlabeled detection of ai-generated texts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18149 (2023). · arXiv
  40. Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. 2023. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 (2023). · arXiv
  41. Pengyu Wang, Linyang Li, Ke Ren, Botian Jiang, Dong Zhang, and Xipeng Qiu. 2023. SeqXGPT: Sentence-Level AI- Generated Text Detection. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1144-1156.
  42. Yiheng Wang. 2023. Large Language Models Evaluate Machine Translation via Polishing. 2023 6th International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 158-163.
  43. Yuxia Wang, Jonibek Mansurov, Petar Ivanov, Jinyan Su, Artem Shelmanov, Akim Tsvigun, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Tarek Mahmoud, Giovanni Puccetti, Thomas Arnold, Alham Aji, Nizar Habash, Iryna Gurevych, and Preslav Nakov. 2024. M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, 3964-3992.
  44. Yuxia Wang, Jonibek Mansurov, Petar Ivanov, Jinyan Su, Artem Shelmanov, Akim Tsvigun, Chenxi Whitehouse, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Tarek Mahmoud, Alham Fikri Aji, et al. 2023. M4: Multi-generator, multi-domain, and multi-lingual black-box machine-generated text detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14902 (2023). · arXiv
  45. Zhuohan Xie, Trevor Cohn, and Jey Han Lau. 2023. The Next Chapter: A Study of Large Language Models in Storytelling. Proceedings of the 16th International Natural Language Generation Conference, 323-351.
  46. Han Xu, Jie Ren, Pengfei He, Shenglai Zeng, Yingqian Cui, Amy Liu, Hui Liu, and Jiliang Tang. 2023. On the generalization of training-based chatgpt detection methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01307 (2023). · arXiv
  47. Aiyuan Yang, Bin Xiao, Bingning Wang, Borong Zhang, Ce Bian, Chao Yin, Chenxu Lv, Da Pan, Dian Wang, Dong Yan, et al. 2023. Baichuan 2: Open large-scale language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10305 (2023). · arXiv
  48. Jingfeng Yang, Hongye Jin, Ruixiang Tang, Xiaotian Han, Qizhang Feng, Haoming Jiang, Shaochen Zhong, Bing Yin, and Xia Hu. 2024. Harnessing the power of llms in practice: A survey on chatgpt and beyond. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 18, 6 (2024), 1-32.
  49. Lingyi Yang, Feng Jiang, and Haizhou Li. 2023. Is chatgpt involved in texts? measure the polish ratio to detect chatgpt-generated text. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing 13, 2 (2023).
  50. Zhilin Yang, Zihang Dai, Yiming Yang, Jaime Carbonell, Russ R Salakhutdinov, and Quoc V Le. 2019. Xlnet: Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding. Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019).
  51. Aohan Zeng, Xiao Liu, Zhengxiao Du, Zihan Wang, Hanyu Lai, Ming Ding, Zhuoyi Yang, Yifan Xu, Wendi Zheng, Xiao Xia, et al. 2022. Glm-130b: An open bilingual pre-trained model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02414 (2022). · arXiv
  52. Qihui Zhang, Chujie Gao, Dongping Chen, Yue Huang, Yixin Huang, Zhenyang Sun, Shilin Zhang, Weiye Li, Zhengyan Fu, Yao Wan, and Lichao Sun. 2024. LLM-as-a-Coauthor: Can Mixed Human-Written and Machine-Generated Text Be Detected?. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics, 409-436.
  53. Zheng Zhang, Jie Gao, Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal, and Toby Jia-Jun Li. 2023. Visar: A human-ai argumentative writing assistant with visual programming and rapid draft prototyping. Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 1-30.
  54. Haiyan Zhao, Hanjie Chen, Fan Yang, Ninghao Liu, Huiqi Deng, Hengyi Cai, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, and Mengnan Du. 2024. Explainability for large language models: A survey. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 15, 2 (2024), 1-38.
  55. Wayne Xin Zhao, Kun Zhou, Junyi Li, Tianyi Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Yupeng Hou, Yingqian Min, Beichen Zhang, Junjie Zhang, Zican Dong, et al. 2023. A survey of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18223 (2023). · arXiv
  56. Xingcheng Zhou, Mingyu Liu, Ekim Yurtsever, Bare Luka Zagar, Walter Zimmer, Hu Cao, and Alois C Knoll. 2024. Vision Language Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey and Outlook. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2024).

Authors
Tao, Z., Chen, Y., Xi, D., Li, Z., & Xu, W.
Affiliations
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
  • Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399695596
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (72271233)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
LLM-generated text detection, large language models, text generation, detection dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review