The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
SoK: Analysis of Software Supply Chain Security by Establishing Secure Design Properties
Open accessAbstract
This paper systematizes knowledge about secure software supply chain patterns. It identifies four stages of a software supply chain attack and proposes three security properties crucial for a secured supply chain: transparency, validity, and separation. The paper describes current security approaches and maps them to the proposed security properties, including research ideas and case studies of supply chains in practice. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of current approaches relative to known attacks and details the various security frameworks put out to ensure the security of the software supply chain. Finally, the paper highlights potential gaps in actor and operation-centered supply chain security techniques
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Okafor, C., Schorlemmer, T. R., Torres-Arias, S., & Davis, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 15-24
- arXiv
- 2406.10109
- OpenAlex
- W4308562555
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2229703)
- Cisco Systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
- Keywords
- software supply chain security, transparency, validity, separation, security framework, supply chain attacks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
