CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 3Digital Media and Visual ArtArt, Technology, and CultureGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

What's Next? Exploring Utilization, Challenges, and Future Directions of AI-Generated Image Tools in Graphic Design

Open access
Tang, Yuying, Ciancia, Mariana, Wang, Zhigang, Gao, Ze·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2406.13436arXiv 2406.13436
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence, such as computer vision and deep learning, have led to the emergence of numerous generative AI platforms, particularly for image generation. However, the application of AI-generated image tools in graphic design has not been extensively explored. This study conducted semi-structured interviews with seven designers of varying experience levels to understand their current usage, challenges, and future functional needs for AI-generated image tools in graphic design. As our findings suggest, AI tools serve as creative partners in design, enhancing human creativity, offering strategic insights, and fostering team collaboration and communication. The findings provide guiding recommendations for the future development of AI-generated image tools, aimed at helping engineers optimize these tools to better meet the needs of graphic designers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2406.13436

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI-generated image tools have impacted workflows, highlighting AI's potential to democratize graphic design and emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration.

    “the impact of AI-generated image tools on workflows has been explored [71, 95], highlighting AI's potential to democratize graphic design [97] and emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance AI systems [68].”

    From Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation (2025) · cites this paper as [95]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 1877-1901.
  2. Chin-Yi Cheng, Forrest Huang, Gang Li, and Yang Li. 2023. PLay: Parametri- cally Conditioned Layout Generation using Latent Diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11529 (2023). · arXiv
  3. Li-Yuan Chiou, Peng-Kai Hung, Rung-Huei Liang, and Chun-Teng Wang. 2023. Designing with AI: An Exploration of Co-Ideation with Image Generators. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1941-1954.
  4. Ahmed Elgammal, Bingchen Liu, Mohamed Elhoseiny, and Marian Mazzone. 2017. Can: Creative adversarial networks, generating" art" by learning about styles and deviating from style norms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.07068 (2017). · arXiv
  5. Duha Engawi, Charlie Gere, and Daniel Richards. 2021. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Graphic Design: Exploring the Challenges and Possibilities of AI-Driven Autonomous Branding. In Congress of the International Association of Societies of Design Research. Springer, 3567-3576.
  6. Jonas Frich, Lindsay MacDonald Vermeulen, Christian Remy, Michael Mose Biskjaer, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2019. Mapping the landscape of creativity support tools in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-18.
  7. Frederic Gmeiner, Humphrey Yang, Lining Yao, Kenneth Holstein, and Nikolas Martelaro. 2023. Exploring challenges and opportunities to support designers in learning to co-create with AI-based manufacturing design tools. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-20.
  8. Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep learning. MIT press.
  9. Mengyao Guo, Xiaolin Zhang, Yuan Zhuang, Jing Chen, Pengfei Wang, and Ze Gao. 2023. Exploring the Intersection of Complex Aesthetics and Generative AI for Promoting Cultural Creativity in Rural China after the Post-Pandemic Era. arXiv:2309.02136 [cs.CY] · arXiv
  10. Daniel Gustafsson et al. 2019. Analysing the Double diamond design process through research & implementation. Master's thesis.
  11. Matthew Guzdial and Mark Riedl. 2019. An interaction framework for studying co-creative ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.09709 (2019). · arXiv
  12. Matthew K Hong, Shabnam Hakimi, Yan-Ying Chen, Heishiro Toyoda, Charlene Wu, and Matt Klenk. 2023. Generative AI for Product Design: Getting the Right Design and the Design Right. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01217 (2023). · arXiv
  13. Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang. 2022. Too late to be creative? AI-empowered tools in creative processes. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1-9.
  14. Anna Kantosalo and Hannu Toivonen. 2016. Modes for creative human-computer collaboration: Alternating and task-divided co-creativity. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on computational creativity. 77-84.
  15. Johanna Karras, Aleksander Holynski, Ting-Chun Wang, and Ira Kemelmacher- Shlizerman. 2023. Dreampose: Fashion image-to-video synthesis via stable diffu- sion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06025 (2023). · arXiv
  16. Kevin Gonyop Kim, Richard Lee Davis, Alessia Eletta Coppi, Alberto Cattaneo, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2022. Mixplorer: Scaffolding Design Space Exploration through Genetic Recombination of Multiple Peoples' Designs to Support Novices' Creativity. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Com- puting Systems. 1-13.
  17. Janin Koch, Nicolas Taffin, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Markku Laine, Andrés Lucero, and Wendy E Mackay. 2020. Imagesense: An intelligent collaborative ideation tool to support diverse human-computer partnerships. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 4, CSCW1 (2020), 1-27.
  18. RAY LC and Yuying Tang. 2023. Speculative Design with Generative AI: Applying Stable Diffusion and ChatGPT to imagining climate change futures. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts. 1-8.
  19. Yu-Hsu Lee and Chun-Yao Chiu. 2023. The Impact of AI Text-to-Image Generator on Product Styling Design. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 502-515.
  20. Haotian Li, Yun Wang, Q Vera Liao, and Huamin Qu. 2023. Why is AI not a Panacea for Data Workers? An Interview Study on Human-AI Collaboration in Data Storytelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08366 (2023). · arXiv
  21. Haotian Li, Yun Wang, and Huamin Qu. 2023. Where Are We So Far? Understand- ing Data Storytelling Tools from the Perspective of Human-AI Collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15723 (2023). · arXiv
  22. JiayiZhou Li, Junxiu Tang, Tan Tang, Haotian Li, Weiwei Cui, Yingcaui Wu, et al. 2024. Understanding Nonlinear Collaboration between Human and AI Agents: A Co-design Framework for Creative Design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.07312 (2024). · arXiv
  23. Linlin Liu, Haijun Zhang, Yuzhu Ji, and QM Jonathan Wu. 2019. Toward AI fashion design: An Attribute-GAN model for clothing match. Neurocomputing 341 (2019), 156-167.
  24. Michael Muller, Lydia B Chilton, Anna Kantosalo, Charles Patrick Martin, and Greg Walsh. 2022. GenAICHI: generative AI and HCI. In CHI conference on human factors in computing systems extended abstracts. 1-7.
  25. Felix Müller-Wienbergen, Oliver Müller, Stefan Seidel, and Jörg Becker. 2011. Leaving the beaten tracks in creative work-A design theory for systems that sup- port convergent and divergent thinking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 12, 11 (2011), 2.
  26. Bahaa Mustafa. 2023. The impact of Artificial Intelligence on the graphic design industry. Res Militaris 13, 3 (2023), 243-255.
  27. SANTIAGO NEGRETE YANKELEVICH and NORA ANGELICA MORALES ZARAGOZA. 2014. The apprentice framework: planning and assessing creativity. Fifth International Conference on Computational Creativity.
  28. Harri Pyykkö, Mari Suoheimo, and Stefan Walter. 2021. Approaching sustainabil- ity transition in supply chains as a wicked problem: systematic literature review in light of the evolved double diamond design process model. Processes 9, 12 (2021), 2135.
  29. Jeba Rezwana and Mary Lou Maher. 2022. Understanding user perceptions, collaborative experience and user engagement in different human-AI interaction designs for co-creative systems. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 38-48.
  30. Ezzat Saad, Mofeda Sadek Elekyaby, Esraa Osama Ali, and Samar Farouk Abd Elkawy Hassan. 2020. Double diamond strategy saves time of the design process. International Design Journal 10, 3 (2020), 211-222.
  31. Othman Sbai, Mohamed Elhoseiny, Antoine Bordes, Yann LeCun, and Camille Couprie. 2018. Design: Design inspiration from generative networks. In Proceed- ings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops. 0-0.
  32. Yuqian Sun, Yuying Tang, Ze Gao, Zhijun Pan, Chuyan Xu, Yurou Chen, Kejiang Qian, Zhigang Wang, Tristan Braud, Chang Hee Lee, et al. 2023. AI Nüshu: An Exploration of Language Emergence in Sisterhood Through the Lens of Computational Linguistics. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Art Papers. 1-7.
  33. Yuying Tang, Yuqian Sun, Ze Gao, Zhijun Pan, Zhigang Wang, Tristan Braud, Chang Hee Lee, and Ali Asadipour. 2023. AI Nüshu (Women's scripts)-An Explo- ration of Language Emergence in Sisterhood. In ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Art Gallery. 1-2.
  34. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
  35. Mathias Peter Verheijden and Mathias Funk. 2023. Collaborative Diffusion: Boosting Designerly Co-Creation with Generative AI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-8.
  36. Kai Wang and Jeffrey V Nickerson. 2017. A literature review on individual creativity support systems. Computers in Human Behavior 74 (2017), 139-151.
  37. Zhuohao Wu, Danwen Ji, Kaiwen Yu, Xianxu Zeng, Dingming Wu, and Moham- mad Shidujaman. 2021. AI creativity and the human-AI co-creation model. In Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Methods and Tools: Thematic Area, HCI 2021, Held as Part of the 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24-29, 2021, Proceedings, Part I 23. Springer, 171-190.
  38. Junyi Zhang, Jiaqi Guo, Shizhao Sun, Jian-Guang Lou, and Dongmei Zhang. 2023. LayoutDiffusion: Improving Graphic Layout Generation by Discrete Diffusion Probabilistic Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11589 (2023). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tang, Y., Ciancia, M., Wang, Z., & Gao, Z.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2406.13436
arXiv
2406.13436
OpenAlex
W4399912798
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
generative AI, graphic design, human-AI collaboration, creative process, team collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review