The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Insights into LLM Long-Context Failures: When Transformers Know but Don't Tell
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit positional bias, struggling to utilize information from the middle or end of long contexts. Our study explores LLMs' long-context reasoning by probing their hidden representations. We find that while LLMs encode the position of target information, they often fail to leverage this in generating accurate responses. This reveals a disconnect between information retrieval and utilization, a "know but don't tell" phenomenon. We further analyze the relationship between extraction time and final accuracy, offering insights into the underlying mechanics of transformer models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These findings align with the 'Know but don't tell' phenomenon proposed by Lu et al. [37], where LLMs identify relevant information but fail to use this knowledge to generate an accurate output.
“These findings align with the “Know but don’t tell” phenomenon proposed by Lu et al. [37], where LLMs identify relevant information but fail to use this knowledge to generate an accurate output.”
From CAIM: Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive AI Memory Framework for Long-Term Interaction with Intelligent Agents (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Guillaume Alain and Yoshua Bengio. 2016. Under- standing intermediate layers using linear classifier probes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.01644. · arXiv
- Amos Azaria and Tom Mitchell. 2023. The internal state of an llm knows when its lying. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13734. · arXiv
- Shouyuan Chen, Sherman Wong, Liangjian Chen, and Yuandong Tian. 2023. Extending context window of large language models via positional interpolation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15595. · arXiv
- Yiran Ding, Li Lyna Zhang, Chengruidong Zhang, Yuanyuan Xu, Ning Shang, Jiahang Xu, Fan Yang, and Mao Yang. 2024. Longrope: Extending llm context window beyond 2 million tokens. Preprint, arXiv:2402.13753. · arXiv
- Omer Goldman, Alon Jacovi, Aviv Slobodkin, Aviya Maimon, Ido Dagan, and Reut Tsarfaty. 2024. Is it really long context if all you need is retrieval? towards genuinely difficult long context nlp. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00402. · arXiv
- Albert Q. Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Men- sch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guil- laume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, Lélio Renard Lavaud, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Pierre Stock, Teven Le Scao, Thibaut Lavril, Thomas Wang, Timothée Lacroix, and William El Sayed. 2023. Mistral 7b. Preprint, arXiv:2310.06825. · arXiv
- Yibo Jiang, Goutham Rajendran, Pradeep Ravikumar, and Bryon Aragam. 2024. Do llms dream of ele- phants (when told not to)? latent concept associa- tion and associative memory in transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18400. · arXiv
- Mingyu Jin, Qinkai Yu, Jingyuan Huang, Qingcheng Zeng, Zhenting Wang, Wenyue Hua, Haiyan Zhao, Kai Mei, Yanda Meng, Kaize Ding, et al. 2024. Ex- ploring concept depth: How large language models acquire knowledge at different layers? arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07066. · arXiv
- Tianjie Ju, Weiwei Sun, Wei Du, Xinwei Yuan, Zhaochun Ren, and Gongshen Liu. 2024. How large language models encode context knowl- edge? a layer-wise probing study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.16061. · arXiv
- Kenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister, and Martin Wattenberg. 2024. Inference- time intervention: Eliciting truthful answers from a language model. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
- Zongjie Li, Chaozheng Wang, Pingchuan Ma, Daoyuan Wu, Shuai Wang, Cuiyun Gao, and Yang Liu. 2023. Split and merge: Aligning position biases in large language model based evaluators. Preprint, arXiv:2310.01432. · arXiv
- Kevin Liu, Stephen Casper, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, and Jacob Andreas. 2023a. Cognitive dissonance: Why do language model outputs disagree with inter- nal representations of truthfulness? arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.03729. · arXiv
- Samuel Marks and Max Tegmark. 2023. The geometry of truth: Emergent linear structure in large language model representations of true/false datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06824. · arXiv
- Leland McInnes, John Healy, and James Melville. 2020. Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. Preprint, arXiv:1802.03426. · arXiv
- Alexander Peysakhovich and Adam Lerer. 2023. At- tention sorting combats recency bias in long context language models. Preprint, arXiv:2310.01427. · arXiv
- Uri Shaham, Maor Ivgi, Avia Efrat, Jonathan Berant, and Omer Levy. 2023. ZeroSCROLLS: A zero-shot benchmark for long text understanding. In Find- ings of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics: EMNLP 2023, pages 7977-7989, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Uri Shaham, Elad Segal, Maor Ivgi, Avia Efrat, Ori Yoran, Adi Haviv, Ankit Gupta, Wenhan Xiong, Mor Geva, Jonathan Berant, and Omer Levy. 2022. SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison over long lan- guage sequences. In Proceedings of the 2022 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 12007-12021, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Lin- guistics.
- Jonathon Shlens. 2014. A tutorial on principal compo- nent analysis. Preprint, arXiv:1404.1100. · arXiv
- CH-Wang Sky, Benjamin Van Durme, Jason Eisner, and Chris Kedzie. 2024. Do androids know they're only dreaming of electric sheep? In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024, pages 4401-4420.
- Raphael Tang, Xinyu Zhang, Xueguang Ma, Jimmy Lin, and Ferhan Ture. 2024. Found in the middle: Permu- tation self-consistency improves listwise ranking in large language models. Preprint, arXiv:2310.07712. · arXiv
- Gemma Team, Thomas Mesnard, Cassidy Hardin, Robert Dadashi, Surya Bhupatiraju, Shreya Pathak, Laurent Sifre, Morgane Rivière, Mihir Sanjay Kale, Juliette Love, et al. 2024. Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08295. · arXiv
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is All You Need. In Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems (NeurIPS).
- Cunxiang Wang, Ruoxi Ning, Boqi Pan, Tonghui Wu, Qipeng Guo, Cheng Deng, Guangsheng Bao, Qian Wang, and Yue Zhang. 2024. Novelqa: A benchmark for long-range novel question answering. Preprint, arXiv:2403.12766. · arXiv
- Yiwei Wang, Yujun Cai, Muhao Chen, Yuxuan Liang, and Bryan Hooi. 2023. Primacy effect of chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13206. · arXiv
- Xinrong Zhang, Yingfa Chen, Shengding Hu, Zi- hang Xu, Junhao Chen, Moo Khai Hao, Xu Han, Zhen Leng Thai, Shuo Wang, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2024a. ∞bench: Extending long context evaluation beyond 100k tokens. Preprint, arXiv:2402.13718. · arXiv
- Zhenyu Zhang, Runjin Chen, Shiwei Liu, Zhewei Yao, Olatunji Ruwase, Beidi Chen, Xiaoxia Wu, and Zhangyang Wang. 2024b. Found in the middle: How language models use long contexts better via plug-and-play positional encoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04797. · arXiv
- Zihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein, and Sameer Singh. 2021. Calibrate before use: Im- proving few-shot performance of language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 12697-12706.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Westhäußer, R., Minker, W., & Zepf, S. (2026) · Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3742413.3789222 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, T., Gao, M., Yu, K., Byerly, A., & Khashabi, D.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- ORCID
- Khashabi, Daniel
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 7611-7625
- arXiv
- 2406.14673
- OpenAlex
- W4404782068
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
- Office of Naval Research (N00014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- long-context reasoning, position bias, large language models, hidden representations, transformer layers, information retrieval, task accuracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
