The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Securing Distributed Network Digital Twin Systems Against Model Poisoning Attacks
Open accessAbstract
In the era of 5G and beyond, the increasing complexity of wireless networks necessitates innovative frameworks for efficient management and deployment. Digital twins (DTs), embodying real-time monitoring, predictive configurations, and enhanced decision-making capabilities, stand out as a promising solution in this context. Within a time-series data-driven framework that effectively maps wireless networks into digital counterparts, encapsulated by integrated vertical and horizontal twinning phases, this study investigates the security challenges in distributed network DT systems, which potentially undermine the reliability of subsequent network applications such as wireless traffic forecasting. Specifically, we consider a minimal-knowledge scenario for all attackers, in that they do not have access to network data and other specialized knowledge, yet can interact with previous iterations of server-level models. In this context, we spotlight a novel fake traffic injection attack designed to compromise a distributed network DT system for wireless traffic prediction. In response, we then propose a defense mechanism, termed global-local inconsistency detection (GLID), to counteract various model poisoning threats. GLID strategically removes abnormal model parameters that deviate beyond a particular percentile range, thereby fortifying the security of network twinning process. Through extensive experiments on real-world wireless traffic datasets, our experimental evaluations show that both our attack and defense strategies significantly outperform existing baselines, highlighting the importance of security measures in the design and implementation of DTs for 5G and beyond network systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If the DT itself is compromised, through model poisoning, replay of stale telemetry, or fabrication of synthetic measurements, the entire trust-scoring chain collapses.
“If the DT itself is compromised, through model poisoning [28], replay of stale telemetry, or fabrication of synthetic measurements, the entire trust-scoring chain collapses.”
Zhang et al. [28] analyze model poisoning attacks against distributed network digital twin systems and propose defensive aggregation techniques.
“Zhang et al. [28] analyze model poisoning attacks against distributed network digital twin systems and propose defensive aggregation techniques.”
The three DT integrity mechanisms directly address the model-poisoning attack class formalized by Zhang et al. [28], which demonstrated that distributed digital twin systems are vulnerable to coordinated update poisoning unless aggregation logic is hardened.
“They also directly address the modelpoisoning attack class formalized by Zhang et al. [28], which demonstrated that distributed digital twin systems are vulnerable to coordinated update poisoning unless aggregation logic is hardened.”
From Crypto-Agile Zero Trust Architecture for IT-OT Convergence in Industrial Control Systems: A Digital Twin-Driven Framework over 5G/TSN with Post-Quantum Cryptography (2026) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. [28]
Current methods for adversarial-training-data detection in the digital-twin context, surveyed by Zhang et al., are not yet robust enough for production.
“current methods, surveyed by Zhang et al. [28], are not yet robust enough for production.”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qadri, S. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.32996/fcsai.2026.5.9.2
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Fang, M., Chen, M., Li, G., Lin, X., & Liu, Y.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- University of Louisville (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 34312-34324
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2407.01917
- OpenAlex
- W4400944318
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2312138, 2312139, 2350076, 2350075)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- digital twin, model poisoning, anomaly detection, 5G, time series, network security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review