Domain Generalization for 6D Pose Estimation Through NeRF-based Image Synthesis
Open accessAbstract
This work introduces a novel augmentation method that increases the diversity of a train set to improve the generalization abilities of a 6D pose estimation network. For this purpose, a Neural Radiance Field is trained from synthetic images and exploited to generate an augmented set. Our method enriches the initial set by enabling the synthesis of images with (i) unseen viewpoints, (ii) rich illumination conditions through appearance extrapolation, and (iii) randomized textures. We validate our augmentation method on the challenging use-case of spacecraft pose estimation and show that it significantly improves the pose estimation generalization capabilities. On the SPEED+ dataset, our method reduces the error on the pose by 50% on both target domains.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Abolfazl Farahani, Sahar Voghoei, Khaled Rasheed, and Hamid R Arabnia. A brief review of domain adaptation. Advances in data science and information engineering: proceedings from ICDATA 2020 and IKE 2020, pages 877-894, 2021. 1, 3
- Jindong Wang, Cuiling Lan, Chang Liu, Yidong Ouyang, Tao Qin, Wang Lu, Yiqiang Chen, Wenjun Zeng, and S Yu Philip. Generalizing to unseen domains: A survey on domain generalization. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 35(8):8052-8072, 2022. 1, 3
- Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99-106, 2021. 1, 2, 3
- Tae Ha Park, Marcus Märtens, Gurvan Lecuyer, Dario Izzo, and Simone D'Amico. Speed+: Next-generation dataset for spacecraft pose estimation across domain gap. In 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO), pages 1-15. IEEE, 2022. 2, 7, 8, 9, 10
- Carl Glen Henshaw. The darpa phoenix spacecraft servicing program: Overview and plans for risk reduction. In International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS). European Space Agency, 2014. 2
- Bo Chen, Jiewei Cao, Alvaro Parra, and Tat-Jun Chin. Satellite pose estimation with deep landmark regression and nonlinear pose refinement. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision workshops, pages 0-0, 2019. 2
- Pedro F Proença and Yang Gao. Deep learning for spacecraft pose estimation from photorealistic rendering. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 6007-6013. IEEE, 2020. 2
- Tae Ha Park and Simone D'Amico. Robust multi-task learning and online refinement for spacecraft pose estimation across domain gap. Advances in Space Research, 73(11):5726-5740, 2024. 2, 3, 7, 8, 9
- Antoine Legrand, Renaud Detry, and Christophe De Vleeschouwer. Leveraging neural radiance fields for pose estimation of an unknown space object during proximity operations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12728, 2024. 3, 4, 6, 10 · arXiv
- Ekaterina Kondrateva, Marina Pominova, Elena Popova, Maxim Sharaev, Alexander Bernstein, and Evgeny Burnaev. Domain shift in computer vision models for mri data analysis: an overview. In Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Vision, volume 11605, pages 126-133. SPIE, 2021. 3
- Swami Sankaranarayanan, Yogesh Balaji, Arpit Jain, Ser Nam Lim, and Rama Chellappa. Learning from synthetic data: Addressing domain shift for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3752-3761, 2018. 3
- Krikamol Muandet, David Balduzzi, and Bernhard Schölkopf. Domain generalization via invariant feature representation. In International conference on machine learning, pages 10-18. PMLR, 2013. 3
- Omer Sagi and Lior Rokach. Ensemble learning: A survey. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery, 8(4):e1249, 2018. 3
- Timothy Hospedales, Antreas Antoniou, Paul Micaelli, and Amos Storkey. Meta-learning in neural networks: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(9):5149-5169, 2021. 3
- Shiv Shankar, Vihari Piratla, Soumen Chakrabarti, Siddhartha Chaudhuri, Preethi Jyothi, and Sunita Sarawagi. Generalizing across domains via cross-gradient training. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.10745, 2018. 3 · arXiv
- Kaiyang Zhou, Yongxin Yang, Timothy Hospedales, and Tao Xiang. Learning to generate novel domains for domain generalization. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23-28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XVI 16, pages 561-578. Springer, 2020. 3
- Kaiyang Zhou, Yongxin Yang, Yu Qiao, and Tao Xiang. Mixstyle neural networks for domain generalization and adaptation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 132(3):822-836, 2024. 3
- Fengchun Qiao, Long Zhao, and Xi Peng. Learning to learn single domain generalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 12556-12565, 2020. 3
- Josh Tobin, Rachel Fong, Alex Ray, Jonas Schneider, Wojciech Zaremba, and Pieter Abbeel. Domain randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world. In 2017 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pages 23-30. IEEE, 2017. 3, 5
- Zijian Wang, Yadan Luo, Ruihong Qiu, Zi Huang, and Mahsa Baktashmotlagh. Learning to diversify for single domain generalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 834-843, 2021. 3, 5
- Mate Kisantal, Sumant Sharma, Tae Ha Park, Dario Izzo, Marcus Märtens, and Simone D'Amico. Satellite pose estimation challenge: Dataset, competition design, and results. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 56(5):4083-4098, 2020. 3
- Juan Ignacio Bravo Pérez-Villar, Álvaro García-Martín, and Jesús Bescós. Spacecraft pose estimation based on unsupervised domain adaptation and on a 3d-guided loss combination. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 37-52. Springer, 2022. 3, 8
- Zi Wang, Minglin Chen, Yulan Guo, Zhang Li, and Qifeng Yu. Bridging the domain gap in satellite pose estimation: a self-training approach based on geometrical constraints. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023. 3, 8
- Maximilian Ulmer, Maximilian Durner, Martin Sundermeyer, Manuel Stoiber, and Rudolph Triebel. 6d object pose estimation from approximate 3d models for orbital robotics. In 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 10749-10756. IEEE, 2023. 3
- Antoine Legrand, Renaud Detry, and Christophe De Vleeschouwer. Domain generalization for in-orbit 6d pose estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11743, 2024. 3, 5, 7 · arXiv
- Zhun Zhong, Liang Zheng, Guoliang Kang, Shaozi Li, and Yi Yang. Random erasing data augmentation. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 34, pages 13001-13008, 2020. 3
- Krishna Kumar Singh, Hao Yu, Aron Sarmasi, Gautam Pradeep, and Yong Jae Lee. Hide-and-seek: A data augmentation technique for weakly-supervised localization and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02545, 2018. 3 · arXiv
- Dimitrios Sakkos, Hubert PH Shum, and Edmond SL Ho. Illumination-based data augmentation for robust background subtraction. In 2019 13th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA), pages 1-8. IEEE, 2019. 3
- Philip TG Jackson, Amir Atapour Abarghouei, Stephen Bonner, Toby P Breckon, and Boguslaw Obara. Style augmentation: data augmentation via style randomization. In CVPR workshops, volume 6, pages 10-11, 2019. 3, 9
- Thomas Müller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, and Alexander Keller. Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 41(4):1-15, 2022. 3
- Ricardo Martin-Brualla, Noha Radwan, Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Jonathan T Barron, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Daniel Duckworth. Nerf in the wild: Neural radiance fields for unconstrained photo collections. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7210-7219, 2021. 3, 5, 6
- Sara Fridovich-Keil, Giacomo Meanti, Frederik Rahbæk Warburg, Benjamin Recht, and Angjoo Kanazawa. K-planes: Explicit radiance fields in space, time, and appearance. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12479-12488, 2023. 4, 5, 8
- Yunhao Ge, Harkirat Behl, Jiashu Xu, Suriya Gunasekar, Neel Joshi, Yale Song, Xin Wang, Laurent Itti, and Vibhav Vineet. Neural-sim: Learning to generate training data with nerf. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 477-493. Springer, 2022. 4
- Robert Geirhos, Patricia Rubisch, Claudio Michaelis, Matthias Bethge, Felix A Wichmann, and Wieland Brendel. Imagenet- trained cnns are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.12231, 2018. 7 · arXiv
- Dan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Norman Mu, Saurav Kadavath, Frank Wang, Evan Dorundo, Rahul Desai, Tyler Zhu, Samyak Parajuli, Mike Guo, et al. The many faces of robustness: A critical analysis of out-of-distribution generalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 8340-8349, 2021. 7
- Eberhard Gill, Simone D'Amico, and Oliver Montenbruck. Autonomous formation flying for the prisma mission. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 44(3):671-681, 2007. 7
- Tae Ha Park, Juergen Bosse, and Simone D'Amico. Robotic testbed for rendezvous and optical navigation: Multi-source calibration and machine learning use cases. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.05529, 2021. 8 · arXiv
- Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 6105-6114. PMLR, 2019. 8
- Mingxing Tan, Ruoming Pang, and Quoc V Le. Efficientdet: Scalable and efficient object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10781-10790, 2020. 8
- Yannick Bukschat and Marcus Vetter. Efficientpose: An efficient, accurate and scalable end-to-end 6d multi object pose estimation approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.04307, 2020. 8 · arXiv
- Vincent Lepetit, Francesc Moreno-Noguer, and Pascal Fua. Ep n p: An accurate o (n) solution to the p n p problem. International journal of computer vision, 81:155-166, 2009. 8
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, Z., Liu, Y., & Zhang, E. (2024) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace11110948 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Legrand, A., Detry, R., & De Vleeschouwer, C.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2407.10762
- OpenAlex
- W4400717315
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- 6D pose estimation, domain generalization, data augmentation, neural radiance fields, image generation, spacecraft pose estimation, lighting conditions, texture changes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review