The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
Open accessAbstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a standard architectural pattern for incorporating domain-specific knowledge into user-facing chat applications powered by Large Language Models (LLMs). RAG systems are characterized by (1) a document retriever that queries a domain-specific corpus for context information relevant to an input query, and (2) an LLM that generates a response based on the provided query and context. However, comprehensive evaluation of RAG systems remains a challenge due to the lack of unified evaluation criteria and annotated datasets. In response, we introduce RAGBench: the first comprehensive, large-scale RAG benchmark dataset of 100k examples. It covers five unique industry-specific domains and various RAG task types. RAGBench examples are sourced from industry corpora such as user manuals, making it particularly relevant for industry applications. Further, we formalize the TRACe evaluation framework: a set of explainable and actionable RAG evaluation metrics applicable across all RAG domains. We release the labeled dataset at https://huggingface.co/datasets/rungalileo/ragbench. RAGBench explainable labels facilitate holistic evaluation of RAG systems, enabling actionable feedback for continuous improvement of production applications. Thorough extensive benchmarking, we find that LLM-based RAG evaluation methods struggle to compete with a finetuned RoBERTa model on the RAG evaluation task. We identify areas where existing approaches fall short and propose the adoption of RAGBench with TRACe towards advancing the state of RAG evaluation systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, existing RAG benchmarks typically assume a static or slowly changing knowledge base and short-lived interactions, emphasizing retrieval accuracy and grounding over the continual updating and selective forgetting of information that is central to memory agents.”
From Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Friel et al., 2024
Citations
Cites
FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data
Chen, Z., Chen, W., Smiley, C., Shah, S., Borova, I., Langdon, D., Moussa, R., Beane, M., Huang, T.-H., Routledge, B., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.300 · Cited by 258 · cited 2×
“We source data from open-book Question-Answer (QA) datasets (CovidQA [27], PubmedQA [15], HotpotQA [42], MS Marco [29], CUAD [12], EManual [28], TechQA [3], FinQA [5], TAT-QA [47], ExpertQA [26], HAGRID [16]), as well one that was specifically adapted for RAG (DelucionQA [34]).”
MethodEvaluating Correctness and Faithfulness of Instruction-Following Models for Question Answering
Adlakha, V., BehnamGhader, P., Lu, X. H., Meade, N., & Reddy, S. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00667 · Cited by 74
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions
Hu, Y., Wang, Y., & McAuley, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.05257 · Cited by 1
“While promising, LOCOMO still features relatively short conversations ( ∼ 9k), and LongMemEval uses synthetic conversations with limited topical diversity, making the dialogues less realistic and potentially less representative of real-world memory use cases.”
Cherif, A. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.00009 · Cited by 1
“Answer Accuracy (AA) is the token-F1 between generated answer and gold reference (SQuAD-style normalisation), identical to the metric used in the RAGBench benchmark [36].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Friel, R., Belyi, M., & Sanyal, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2407.11005
- OpenAlex
- W4403753183
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- retrieval-augmented generation, RAG evaluation, benchmark dataset, large language models, document retrieval, user manual, RoBERTa fine-tuning, annotated dataset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2407.11005
- The paper
- Friel, R., Belyi, M., & Sanyal, A. (2024). RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.11005