From Low Rank Gradient Subspace Stabilization to Low-Rank Weights: Observations, Theories, and Applications
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models' (LLMs) weight matrices can often be expressed in low-rank form with potential to relax memory and compute resource requirements. Unlike prior efforts that focus on developing novel matrix decompositions, in this work we study the non-uniform low-rank properties of weight matrices in LLMs through the lens of stabilizing gradient subspace. First, we provide a theoretical framework to understand the stabilization of gradient subspaces through Hessian analysis. Second, we empirically establish an important relationship between gradient dynamics and low-rank expressiveness of weight matrices. Our findings reveal that different LLM components exhibit varying levels of converged low-rank structures, necessitating variable rank reduction across them to minimize drop in performance due to compression. Drawing on this result, we present Weight Low-Rank Projection(WeLore) that unifies weight compression and memory-efficient fine-tuning into one, in a data-agnostic and one-shot manner. When used as a compression technique, WeLore categorizes weight matrices into Low-rank Components (LRCs) and Non-Low-rank Components (N-LRCs) and suitably encodes them for minimum performance loss. Our gradient dynamics perspective illustrates that LRCs tend to have better fine-tuning capabilities and their standalone fine-tuning can closely mimic and sometimes outperform the training loss trajectory and performance of full fine-tuning with notable memory and compute footprint reduction. Codes are available at https://github.com/VITA-Group/WeLore.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLM weight matrices often exhibit pronounced low-rank structure.
“LLM weight matrices often exhibit pronounced low-rank structure [17, 18].”
From LittleBit: Ultra Low-Bit Quantization via Latent Factorization (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 53
- Biderman, D., Ortiz, J. G., Portes, J., Paul, M., Greengard, P., Jennings, C., King, D., Havens, S., Chiley, V., Frankle, J., et al. Lora learns less and forgets less. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09673, 2024a. · arXiv
- Biderman, D., Portes, J., Ortiz, J. J. G., Paul, M., Greengard, P., Jennings, C., King, D., Havens, S., Chiley, V., Frankle, J., Blakeney, C., and Cunningham, J. P. Lora learns less and forgets less, 2024b. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2405.09673. · arXiv
- Brock, A., Lim, T., Ritchie, J. M., and Weston, N. Freeze- out: Accelerate training by progressively freezing layers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.04983, 2017. · arXiv
- Chen, D., Bolton, J., and Manning, C. D. A thorough examination of the cnn/daily mail reading comprehension task. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02858, 2016. · arXiv
- Dettmers, T., Pagnoni, A., Holtzman, A., and Zettlemoyer, L. Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14314. · arXiv
- Diao, S., Huang, Z., Xu, R., Li, X., Lin, Y., Zhou, X., and Zhang, T. Black-box prompt learning for pre-trained lan- guage models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08531, 2022. · arXiv
- Ergen, T. and Pilanci, M. Revealing the structure of deep neural networks via convex duality, 2021. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2002.09773.
- Frantar, E. and Alistarh, D. Sparsegpt: Massive language models can be accurately pruned in one-shot. In Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 10323- 10337. PMLR, 2023.
- Galanti, T., Siegel, Z. S., Gupte, A., and Poggio, T. Sgd and weight decay secretly minimize the rank of your neural network, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2206.05794.
- Hambardzumyan, K., Khachatrian, H., and May, J. Warp: Word-level adversarial reprogramming. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00121, 2021. · arXiv
- Hao, Y., Cao, Y., and Mou, L. Flora: Low-rank adapters are secretly gradient compressors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03293, 2024. · arXiv
- Hayou, S., Ghosh, N., and Yu, B. Lora+: Efficient low rank adaptation of large models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12354, 2024. · arXiv
- Houlsby, N., Giurgiu, A., Jastrzebski, S., Morrone, B., De Laroussilhe, Q., Gesmundo, A., Attariyan, M., and Gelly, S. Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 2790- 2799. PMLR, 2019.
- Hsu, Y.-C., Hua, T., Chang, S., Lou, Q., Shen, Y., and Jin, H. Language model compression with weighted low-rank factorization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00112, 2022a. · arXiv
- Hsu, Y.-C., Hua, T., Chang, S., Lou, Q., Shen, Y., and Jin, H. Language model compression with weighted low-rank factorization, 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2207.00112. · arXiv
- Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., and Chen, W. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685, 2021a. · arXiv
- Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., and Chen, W. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models, 2021b. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2106.09685.
- Iyyer, M., Boyd-Graber, J. L., Claudino, L. M. B., Socher, R., and Daumé, H. A neural network for factoid ques- tion answering over paragraphs. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2014. URL https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:216034672.
- Jain, S., Keshava, V., Sathyendra, S. M., Fernandes, P., Liu, P., Neubig, G., and Zhou, C. Multi-dimensional evaluation of text summarization with in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01200, 2023. · arXiv
- Jaiswal, A., Gan, Z., Du, X., Zhang, B., Wang, Z., and Yang, Y. Compressing llms: The truth is rarely pure and never simple. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01382, 2023. · arXiv
- Jaiswal, A., Gan, Z., Du, X., Zhang, B., Wang, Z., and Yang, Y. Compressing llms: The truth is rarely pure and never simple, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2310.01382. · arXiv
- Ji, Z. and Telgarsky, M. Directional convergence and align- ment in deep learning, 2020. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2006.06657.
- Jiang, K., Wu, D., and Jiang, H. Freebaseqa: A new factoid qa data set matching trivia-style question- answer pairs with freebase. In North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. URL https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:174800890.
- Joshi, M., Choi, E., Weld, D. S., and Zettlemoyer, L. Triviaqa: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.03551, 2017. · arXiv
- Kaushal, A., Vaidhya, T., and Rish, I. Lord: Low rank decomposition of monolingual code llms for one-shot compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.14021, 2023a. · arXiv
- Kaushal, A., Vaidhya, T., and Rish, I. Lord: Low rank decomposition of monolingual code llms for one-shot compression, 2023b. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2309.14021. · arXiv
- Le, T. and Jegelka, S. Training invariances and the low- rank phenomenon: beyond linear networks, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11968. · arXiv
- Li, S., Yuan, G., Dai, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., and Tang, X. Smartfrz: An efficient training framework using attention- based layer freezing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.16720, 2024. · arXiv
- Li, Y., Yu, Y., Zhang, Q., Liang, C., He, P., Chen, W., and Zhao, T. Losparse: Structured compression of large lan- guage models based on low-rank and sparse approxima- tion, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2306. 11222.
- Lialin, V., Shivagunde, N., Muckatira, S., and Rumshisky, A. Relora: High-rank training through low-rank up- dates, 2023a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2307.05695.
- Lialin, V., Shivagunde, N., Muckatira, S., and Rumshisky, A. Stack more layers differently: High-rank training through low-rank updates. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05695, 2023b. · arXiv
- Liu, S.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., Yin, H., Molchanov, P., Wang, Y.-C. F., Cheng, K.-T., and Chen, M.-H. Dora: Weight-decomposed low-rank adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.09353, 2024. · arXiv
- Liu, Y., Agarwal, S., and Venkataraman, S. Autofreeze: Automatically freezing model blocks to accelerate fine- tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.01386, 2021. · arXiv
- Meng, F., Wang, Z., and Zhang, M. Pissa: Principal sin- gular values and singular vectors adaptation of large lan- guage models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2404.02948. · arXiv
- Ongie, G. and Willett, R. The role of linear layers in nonlinear interpolating networks, 2022. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2202.00856.
- Renduchintala, A., Konuk, T., and Kuchaiev, O. Tied-lora: Enhacing parameter efficiency of lora with weight tying. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09578, 2023. · arXiv
- Saha, R., Srivastava, V., and Pilanci, M. Matrix compression via randomized low rank and low precision factorization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2023.
- Sheng, Y., Cao, S., Li, D., Hooper, C., Lee, N., Yang, S., Chou, C., Zhu, B., Zheng, L., Keutzer, K., et al. S-lora: Serving thousands of concurrent lora adapters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.03285, 2023. · arXiv
- Sun, M., Liu, Z., Bair, A., and Kolter, J. Z. A simple and effective pruning approach for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11695, 2023. · arXiv
- Tian, Y., Yu, L., Chen, X., and Ganguli, S. Understanding self-supervised learning with dual deep networks, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.00578. · arXiv
- Timor, N., Vardi, G., and Shamir, O. Implicit regularization towards rank minimization in relu networks, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.12760. · arXiv
- Wang, H., Agarwal, S., Tanaka, Y., Xing, E., Papailiopoulos, D., et al. Cuttlefish: Low-rank model training without all the tuning. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 5, 2023a.
- Wang, H., Agarwal, S., U-chupala, P., Tanaka, Y., Xing, E. P., and Papailiopoulos, D. Cuttlefish: Low-rank model training without all the tuning, 2023b. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2305.02538.
- Wang, X., Zheng, Y., Wan, Z., and Zhang, M. Svd- llm: Truncation-aware singular value decomposition for large language model compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07378, 2024. · arXiv
- Xia, W., Qin, C., and Hazan, E. Chain of lora: Efficient fine- tuning of language models via residual learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04151, 2024. · arXiv
- Yin, L., Wu, Y., Zhang, Z., Hsieh, C.-Y., Wang, Y., Jia, Y., Pechenizkiy, M., Liang, Y., Wang, Z., and Liu, S. Out- lier weighed layerwise sparsity (owl): A missing secret sauce for pruning llms to high sparsity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05175, 2023. · arXiv
- Yuan, Z., Shang, Y., Song, Y., Wu, Q., Yan, Y., and Sun, G. Asvd: Activation-aware singular value decomposition for compressing large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.05821, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Shi, S., Chu, X., and Li, B. Lora-fa: Memory-efficient low-rank adaptation for large language models fine-tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03303, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, B., Schäfer, F., and Anandkumar, A. Inrank: Incremental low-rank learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11250, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhao, J., Zhang, Z., Chen, B., Wang, Z., Anandkumar, A., and Tian, Y. Galore: Memory-efficient llm train- ing by gradient low-rank projection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03507, 2024a. · arXiv
- Zhao, J., Zhang, Z., Chen, B., Wang, Z., Anandkumar, A., and Tian, Y. Galore: Memory-efficient llm training by gradient low-rank projection, 2024b. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2403.03507.
- Zheng, L., Chiang, W.-L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., Xing, E., et al. Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05685, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhong, Z., Friedman, D., and Chen, D. Factual probing is [mask]: Learning vs. learning to recall. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.05240, 2021. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LittleBit: Ultra Low-Bit Quantization via Latent Factorization
Lee, B., Kim, D., You, Y., & Kim, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.13771
“For instance, at compression ratios exceeding 50%, SVD-based approaches [21] consistently outperform pruning methods like Wanda [22] (see Appendix A.5 for details).”
- Authors
- Jaiswal, A., Wang, Y., Yin, L., Liu, S., Chen, R., Zhao, J., Grama, A., Tian, Y., & Wang, Z.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Meta (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2407.11239
- OpenAlex
- W4403753878
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2145346)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- large language models, weight compression, Hessian analysis, gradient dynamics, memory-efficient fine-tuning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review