PreprintCited by 1Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsArtificial Intelligence in GamesAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Enhancing Agent Learning through World Dynamics Modeling

Open access
Sun, Zhiyuan, Shi, Haochen, Côté, Marc-Alexandre, Berseth, Glen, Yuan, Xingdi, Liu, Bang·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly applied to tasks in language understanding and interactive decision-making, with their impressive performance largely attributed to the extensive domain knowledge embedded within them. However, the depth and breadth of this knowledge can vary across domains. Many existing approaches assume that LLMs possess a comprehensive understanding of their environment, often overlooking potential gaps in their grasp of actual world dynamics. To address this, we introduce Discover, Verify, and Evolve (DiVE), a framework that discovers world dynamics from a small number of demonstrations, verifies the accuracy of these dynamics, and evolves new, advanced dynamics tailored to the current situation. Through extensive evaluations, we assess the impact of each component on performance and compare the dynamics generated by DiVE to human-annotated dynamics. Our results show that LLMs guided by DiVE make more informed decisions, achieving rewards comparable to human players in the Crafter environment and surpassing methods that require prior task-specific training in the MiniHack environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2407.17695

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, Z., Shi, H., Côté, M.-A., Berseth, G., Yuan, X., & Liu, B.
Affiliations
  • Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
  • Microsoft Research Montréal (Canada) (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402618159
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (rgpin-2021-03115)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
agent learning, large language models, interactive decision making, demonstration-based learning, game environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review