PreprintCited by 5Data Visualization and AnalyticsSoftware Engineering ResearchUsability and User Interface Design

The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Considering Visualization Example Galleries

Open access

Abstract

Example galleries are often used to teach, document, and advertise visually-focused domain-specific languages and libraries, such as those producing visualizations, diagrams, or webpages. Despite their ubiquity, there is no consensus on the role of "example galleries", let alone what the best practices might be for their creation or curation. To understand gallery meaning and usage, we interviewed the creators (N=11) and users (N=9) of prominent visualization-adjacent tools. From these interviews we synthesized strategies and challenges for gallery curation and management (e.g. weighing the costs/benefits of adding new examples and trade-offs in richness vs ease of use), highlighted the differences between planned and actual gallery usage (e.g. opportunistic reuse vs search-engine optimization), and reflected on parts of the gallery design space not explored (e.g. highlighting the potential of tool assistance). We found that galleries are multi-faceted structures whose form and content are motivated to accommodate different usages--ranging from marketing material to test suite to extended documentation. This work offers a foundation for future support tools by characterizing gallery design and management, as well as by highlighting challenges and opportunities in the space (such as how more diverse galleries make reuse tasks simpler, but complicate upkeep).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2407.20571

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 5

Metadata

Authors
Yang, J., McNutt, A., & Battle, L.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Pages
329-343
ISSN
1943-6092 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403446902
Cited by
5
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2141506)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
visualization tools, gallery management, domain-specific languages, documentation, tool reuse, gallery design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Considering Visualization Example Galleries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2407.20571
The paper
Yang, J., McNutt, A., & Battle, L. (2024). Considering Visualization Example Galleries. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.20571