PreprintCited by 2Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Emotion and Mood Recognition

The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Sentiment Reasoning for Healthcare

Open access

Abstract

Transparency in AI healthcare decision-making is crucial. By incorporating rationales to explain reason for each predicted label, users could understand Large Language Models (LLMs)'s reasoning to make better decision. In this work, we introduce a new task - Sentiment Reasoning - for both speech and text modalities, and our proposed multimodal multitask framework and the world's largest multimodal sentiment analysis dataset. Sentiment Reasoning is an auxiliary task in sentiment analysis where the model predicts both the sentiment label and generates the rationale behind it based on the input transcript. Our study conducted on both human transcripts and Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) transcripts shows that Sentiment Reasoning helps improve model transparency by providing rationale for model prediction with quality semantically comparable to humans while also improving model's classification performance (+2% increase in both accuracy and macro-F1) via rationale-augmented fine-tuning. Also, no significant difference in the semantic quality of generated rationales between human and ASR transcripts. All code, data (five languages - Vietnamese, English, Chinese, German, and French) and models are published online: https://github.com/leduckhai/Sentiment-Reasoning

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2407.21054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 2

Metadata

Authors
Nguyen, K.-N., Le-Duc, K., Tat, B. P., Le, D., Vo-Dang, L., & Hy, T.-S.
Affiliations
  • William & Mary (US)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Bucknell University (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401306284
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
sentiment analysis, rationale generation, large language models, multimodal sentiment analysis, automatic speech recognition transcripts, model transparency, healthcare decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sentiment Reasoning for Healthcare. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2407.21054
The paper
Nguyen, K.-N., Le-Duc, K., Tat, B. P., Le, D., Vo-Dang, L., & Hy, T.-S. (2024). Sentiment Reasoning for Healthcare. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.21054