CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 42Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Medical SAM 2: Segment medical images as video via Segment Anything Model 2

Open access
Zhu, Jiayuan, Hamdi, Abdullah, Qi, Yunli, Jin, Yueming, Wu, Junde·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2408.00874arXiv 2408.00874
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Medical image segmentation plays a pivotal role in clinical diagnostics and treatment planning, yet existing models often face challenges in generalization and in handling both 2D and 3D data uniformly. In this paper, we introduce Medical SAM 2 (MedSAM-2), a generalized auto-tracking model for universal 2D and 3D medical image segmentation. The core concept is to leverage the Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) pipeline to treat all 2D and 3D medical segmentation tasks as a video object tracking problem. To put it into practice, we propose a novel \emph{self-sorting memory bank} mechanism that dynamically selects informative embeddings based on confidence and dissimilarity, regardless of temporal order. This mechanism not only significantly improves performance in 3D medical image segmentation but also unlocks a \emph{One-Prompt Segmentation} capability for 2D images, allowing segmentation across multiple images from a single prompt without temporal relationships. We evaluated MedSAM-2 on five 2D tasks and nine 3D tasks, including white blood cells, optic cups, retinal vessels, mandibles, coronary arteries, kidney tumors, liver tumors, breast cancer, nasopharynx cancer, vestibular schwannoma, mediastinal lymph nodules, cerebral artery, inferior alveolar nerve, and abdominal organs, comparing it against state-of-the-art (SOTA) models in task-tailored, general and interactive segmentation settings. Our findings demonstrate that MedSAM-2 surpasses a wide range of existing models and updates new SOTA on several benchmarks. The code is released on the project page: https://supermedintel.github.io/Medical-SAM2/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2408.00874

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In-context learning models are computationally efficient and can adapt their predictions based on a small support set.

    “Unlike previous approaches, that rely on training CNNs [29] or computationally expensive atlas-based registration methods as reverse classifiers [5], [28], in-context learning models are computationally efficient and can adapt their predictions based on a small support set.”

    From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    Related Works (p. 3) says few-shot methods adapt to new tasks with minimal annotated samples and describes one-prompt segmentation without retraining. The cited paper does not establish that in-context learning models are computationally efficient, particularly relative to the approaches named in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. [3][3] Amir Hossein Abdi, Shohreh Kasaei, and Mojdeh Mehdizadeh. Automatic segmentation of mandible in panoramic x-ray. Journal of Medical Imaging , 2(4):044003044003, 2015. 6 -
  2. [4][4] Dosovitskiy Alexey. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2010.11929 , 2020. 1 - · arXiv
  3. [5][5] Tomer Amit, Eliya Nachmani, Tal Shaharbany, and Lior Wolf. Segdiff: Image segmentation with diffusion probabilistic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00390 , 2021. 7 - · arXiv
  4. [6][6] Mehdi Astaraki, Simone Bendazzoli, and Iuliana Toma-Dasu. Fully automatic segmentation of gross target volume and organs-at-risk for radiotherapy planning of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02972 , 2023. 5 - · arXiv
  5. [7][7] Ujjwal Baid, Satyam Ghodasara, Suyash Mohan, Michel Bilello, Evan Calabrese, Errol Colak, Keyvan Farahani, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Felipe C Kitamura, Sarthak Pati, et al. The rsna-asnr-miccai brats 2021 benchmark on brain tumor segmentation and radiogenomic classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02314 , 2021. 5 - · arXiv
  6. [8][8] Nicholas Bloch, Anant Madabhushi, Henkjan Huisman, John Freymann, Justin Kirby, Michael Grauer, Andinet Enquobahrie, Carl Jaffe, Larry Clarke, and Keyvan Farahani. Nci-isbi 2013 challenge: automated segmentation of prostate structures. The Cancer Imaging Archive , 370(6):5, 2015. 5 -
  7. [9][9] Federico Bolelli. Tooth fairy: A cone-beam computed tomography segmentation challenge. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2023 , 2023. 5 -
  8. [11][11] Victor Ion Butoi, Jose Javier Gonzalez Ortiz, Tianyu Ma, Mert R Sabuncu, John Guttag, and Adrian V Dalca. Universeg: Universal medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06131 , 2023. 3, 7, 8 - · arXiv
  9. [12][12] Bingzhi Chen, Yishu Liu, Zheng Zhang, Guangming Lu, and Adams Wai Kin Kong. Transattunet: Multi-level attentionguided u-net with transformer for medical image segmenta- 13. tion. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence , 2023. 2 -
  10. [13][13] Huijun Chen. Cerebral artery segmentation challenge. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2023. , 2023. 5 -
  11. [14][14] Jieneng Chen, Yongyi Lu, Qihang Yu, Xiangde Luo, Ehsan Adeli, Yan Wang, Le Lu, Alan L Yuille, and Yuyin Zhou. Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04306 , 2021. 2, 7 - · arXiv
  12. [15][15] Junlong Cheng, Jin Ye, Zhongying Deng, Jianpin Chen, Tianbin Li, Haoyu Wang, Yanzhou Su, Ziyan Huang, Jilong Chen, Lei Jiang, et al. Sam-med2d. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16184 , 2023. 3 - · arXiv
  13. [16][16] Junlong Cheng et al. Sam-med2d. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16184 , 2023. 7 - · arXiv
  14. [17][17] Özgün Çiçek, Ahmed Abdulkadir, Soeren S Lienkamp, Thomas Brox, and Olaf Ronneberger. 3d u-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2016: 19th International Conference, Athens, Greece, October 17-21, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 19 , pages 424-432. Springer, 2016. 1, 2 -
  15. [18][18] Guoyao Deng, Ke Zou, Kai Ren, Meng Wang, Xuedong Yuan, Sancong Ying, and Huazhu Fu. Sam-u: Multi-box prompts triggered uncertainty estimation for reliable sam in medical image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04973 , 2023. 3 - · arXiv
  16. [19][19] Guoyao Deng et al. Sam-u: Multi-box prompts triggered uncertainty estimation for reliable sam in medical image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04973 , 2023. 7 - · arXiv
  17. [20][20] Hao Ding, Changchang Sun, Hao Tang, Dawen Cai, and Yan Yan. Few-shot medical image segmentation with cycleresemblance attention. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages 2488-2497, 2023. 3 -
  18. [21][21] Huihui Fang, Fei Li, Huazhu Fu, Xu Sun, Xingxing Cao, Jaemin Son, Shuang Yu, Menglu Zhang, Chenglang Yuan, Cheng Bian, et al. Refuge2 challenge: Treasure for multidomain learning in glaucoma assessment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08994 , 2022. 5 - · arXiv
  19. [22][22] Xi Fang and Pingkun Yan. Multi-organ segmentation over partially labeled datasets with multi-scale feature abstraction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , 39(11):3619-3629, 2020. 5, 6, 8 -
  20. [24][24] Abdullah Hamdi, Silvio Giancola, and Bernard Ghanem. Mvtn: Multi-view transformation network for 3d shape recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages 1-11, 2021. 2 -
  21. [25][25] Abdullah Hamdi, Silvio Giancola, and Bernard Ghanem. Voint cloud: Multi-view point cloud representation for 3d understanding. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , 2023. -
  22. [26][26] Abdullah Hamdi, Faisal AlZahrani, Silvio Giancola, and Bernard Ghanem. Mvtn: Learning multi-view transformations for 3d understanding. International Journal of Computer Vision , 2024. 2 -
  23. [27][27] Ali Hatamizadeh, Vishwesh Nath, Yucheng Tang, Dong Yang, Holger R Roth, and Daguang Xu. Swin unetr: Swin transformers for semantic segmentation of brain tumors in mri images. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop , pages 272-284. Springer, 2022. 7 -
  24. [28][28] Ali Hatamizadeh, Yucheng Tang, Vishwesh Nath, Dong Yang, Andriy Myronenko, Bennett Landman, Holger R Roth, and Daguang Xu. Unetr: Transformers for 3d medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages 574-584, 2022. 3, 7 -
  25. [31][31] Moritz R Hernandez Petzsche, Ezequiel de la Rosa, Uta Hanning, Roland Wiest, Waldo Valenzuela, Mauricio Reyes, Maria Meyer, Sook-Lei Liew, Florian Kofler, Ivan Ezhov, et al. Isles 2022: A multi-center magnetic resonance imaging stroke lesion segmentation dataset. Scientific data , 9(1):762, 2022. 5 -
  26. [32][32] AD Hoover, Valentina Kouznetsova, and Michael Goldbaum. Locating blood vessels in retinal images by piecewise threshold probing of a matched filter response. IEEE Transactions on Medical imaging , 19(3):203-210, 2000. 5, 6 -
  27. [33][33] Fabian Isensee, Paul F Jaeger, Simon AA Kohl, Jens Petersen, and Klaus H Maier-Hein. nnu-net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nature methods , 18(2):203-211, 2021. 7 -
  28. [35][35] Wei Ji, Shuang Yu, Junde Wu, Kai Ma, Cheng Bian, Qi Bi, Jingjing Li, Hanruo Liu, Li Cheng, and Yefeng Zheng. Learning calibrated medical image segmentation via multirater agreement modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 12341-12351, 2021. 2 -
  29. [36][36] Yuanfeng Ji, Haotian Bai, Jie Yang, Chongjian Ge, Ye Zhu, Ruimao Zhang, Zhen Li, Lingyan Zhang, Wanling Ma, Xiang Wan, et al. Amos: A large-scale abdominal multi-organ benchmark for versatile medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08023 , 2022. 5 - · arXiv
  30. [38][38] Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, et al. Segment anything. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02643 , 2023. 1, 3, 7 - · arXiv
  31. [39][39] Hugo J Kuijf, J Matthijs Biesbroek, Jeroen De Bresser, Rutger Heinen, Simon Andermatt, Mariana Bento, Matt Berseth, Mikhail Belyaev, M Jorge Cardoso, Adria Casamitjana, et al. Standardized assessment of automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities and results of the wmh segmentation challenge. IEEE transactions on medical imaging , 38(11): 2556-2568, 2019. 5 -
  32. [40][40] Maria Kuklisova-Murgasova, Paul Aljabar, Latha Srinivasan, Serena J Counsell, Valentina Doria, Ahmed Serag, Ioannis S Gousias, James P Boardman, Mary A Rutherford, A David Edwards, et al. A dynamic 4d probabilistic atlas of the developing brain. NeuroImage , 54(4):2750-2763, 2011. 5 -
  33. [41][41] Zoé Lambert, Caroline Petitjean, Bernard Dubray, and Su Kuan. Segthor: Segmentation of thoracic organs at risk in ct images. In 2020 Tenth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA) , pages 1-6. IEEE, 2020. 5 -
  34. [42][42] Bennett Landman, Zhoubing Xu, J Igelsias, Martin Styner, T Langerak, and Arno Klein. Miccai multi-atlas labeling beyond the cranial vault-workshop and challenge. In Proc. MICCAI Multi-Atlas Labeling Beyond Cranial Vault-Workshop Challenge , page 12, 2015. -
  35. [43][43] Guillaume Lemaître, Robert Martí, Jordi Freixenet, Joan C Vilanova, Paul M Walker, and Fabrice Meriaudeau. Computeraided detection and diagnosis for prostate cancer based on mono and multi-parametric mri: a review. Computers in biology and medicine , 60:8-31, 2015. 5 -
  36. [45][45] Geert Litjens, Robert Toth, Wendy Van De Ven, Caroline Hoeks, Sjoerd Kerkstra, Bram Van Ginneken, Graham Vincent, Gwenael Guillard, Neil Birbeck, Jindang Zhang, et al. Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for mri: the promise12 challenge. Medical image analysis , 18(2):359373, 2014. 5 -
  37. [46][46] Xiangde Luo, Wenjun Liao, Jianghong Xiao, Tao Song, Xiaofan Zhang, Kang Li, Guotai Wang, and Shaoting Zhang. Word: Revisiting organs segmentation in the whole abdominal region. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02403 , 1(2):13, 2021. - · arXiv
  38. [47][47] Jun Ma, Yao Zhang, Song Gu, Cheng Zhu, Cheng Ge, Yichi Zhang, Xingle An, Congcong Wang, Qiyuan Wang, Xin Liu, et al. Abdomenct-1k: Is abdominal organ segmentation a solved problem? IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 44(10):6695-6714, 2021. 5 -
  39. [48][48] Jun Ma, Yuting He, Feifei Li, Lin Han, Chenyu You, and Bo Wang. Segment anything in medical images. Nature Communications , 15(1):654, 2024. 2, 4, 5, 7, 1 -
  40. [49][49] Yuhui Ma, Huaying Hao, Jianyang Xie, Huazhu Fu, Jiong Zhang, Jianlong Yang, Zhen Wang, Jiang Liu, Yalin Zheng, and Yitian Zhao. Rose: a retinal oct-angiography vessel segmentation dataset and new model. IEEE transactions on medical imaging , 40(3):928-939, 2020. 5 -
  41. [50][50] Fausto Milletari, Nassir Navab, and Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi. V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. In 2016 fourth international conference on 3D vision (3DV) , pages 565-571. Ieee, 2016. 1, 2 -
  42. [52][52] Cheng Ouyang, Carlo Biffi, Chen Chen, Turkay Kart, Huaqi Qiu, and Daniel Rueckert. Self-supervision with superpixels: Training few-shot medical image segmentation without annotation. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23-28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXIX 16 , pages 762-780. Springer, 2020. 3, 8 -
  43. [53][53] Félix Quinton, Romain Popoff, Benoît Presles, Sarah Leclerc, Fabrice Meriaudeau, Guillaume Nodari, Olivier Lopez, Julie Pellegrinelli, Olivier Chevallier, Dominique Ginhac, et al. A tumour and liver automatic segmentation (atlas) dataset on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma. Data , 8(5):79, 2023. 5 -
  44. [54][54] Perry Radau, Yingli Lu, Kim Connelly, Gideon Paul, Alexander J Dick, and Graham A Wright. Evaluation framework for algorithms segmenting short axis cardiac mri. The MIDAS Journal , 2009. 5 -
  45. [55][55] Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman Rädle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Eric Mintun, Junting Pan, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Nicolas Carion, Chao-Yuan Wu, Ross Girshick, Piotr Dollár, and Christoph Feichtenhofer. Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos. arXiv preprint , 2024. 1, 3, 7, 8 -
  46. [56][56] Erik Ziegler Ron Kikinis, Steve Pieper. Mediastinal lymph node quantification (lnq): Segmentation of heterogeneous ct data. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) , 2023. 5 -
  47. [57][57] Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In MICCAI , pages 234-241. Springer, 2015. 1 -
  48. [58][58] Saikat Roy, Tassilo Wald, Gregor Koehler, Maximilian R Rokuss, Nico Disch, Julius Holzschuh, David Zimmerer, and Klaus H Maier-Hein. Sam. md: Zero-shot medical image segmentation capabilities of the segment anything model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05396 , 2023. 3 - · arXiv
  49. [59][59] Adriel Saporta, Xiaotong Gui, Ashwin Agrawal, Anuj Pareek, SQTruong, CD Nguyen, Van-Doan Ngo, Jayne Seekins, Francis G Blankenberg, AY Ng, et al. Deep learning saliency maps do not accurately highlight diagnostically relevant regions for medical image interpretation. MedRxiv , 2021. 5 -
  50. [61][61] Amber L Simpson, Michela Antonelli, Spyridon Bakas, Michel Bilello, Keyvan Farahani, Bram Van Ginneken, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Bennett A Landman, Geert Litjens, Bjoern Menze, et al. A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.09063 , 2019. 5 - · arXiv
  51. [62][62] Kaixin Wang, Jun Hao Liew, Yingtian Zou, Daquan Zhou, and Jiashi Feng. Panet: Few-shot image semantic segmentation with prototype alignment. In proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 91979206, 2019. 8 -
  52. [64][64] Xinlong Wang, Wen Wang, Yue Cao, Chunhua Shen, and Tiejun Huang. Images speak in images: A generalist painter for in-context visual learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6830-6839, 2023. 1 -
  53. [65][65] Xinlong Wang, Xiaosong Zhang, Yue Cao, Wen Wang, Chunhua Shen, and Tiejun Huang. Seggpt: Segmenting everything in context. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03284 , 2023. - · arXiv
  54. [66][66] Jason Wei, Yi Tay, Rishi Bommasani, Colin Raffel, Barret Zoph, Sebastian Borgeaud, Dani Yogatama, Maarten Bosma, Denny Zhou, Donald Metzler, et al. Emergent abilities of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.07682 , 2022. 1 - · arXiv
  55. [67][67] Qiaoqiao Wei et al. Focused and collaborative feedback integration for interactive image segmentation. In CVPR , pages 18643-18652, 2023. 7 -
  56. [68][68] Julia Wolleb, Robin Sandkühler, Florentin Bieder, Philippe Valmaggia, and Philippe C Cattin. Diffusion models for implicit image segmentation ensembles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.03145 , 2021. 7 - · arXiv
  57. [69][69] Sanghyun Woo, Shoubhik Debnath, Ronghang Hu, Xinlei Chen, Zhuang Liu, In So Kweon, and Saining Xie. Convnext v2: Co-designing and scaling convnets with masked autoencoders. In CVPR , pages 16133-16142, 2023. 7 -
  58. [70][70] Junde Wu and Min Xu. One-prompt to segment all medical images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 11302-11312, 2024. 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 -
  59. [71][71] Junde Wu, Shuang Yu, Wenting Chen, Kai Ma, Rao Fu, Hanruo Liu, Xiaoguang Di, and Yefeng Zheng. Leveraging undi- agnosed data for glaucoma classification with teacher-student learning. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2020: 23rd International Conference, Lima, Peru, October 4-8, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 23 , pages 731-740. Springer, 2020. 3 -
  60. [72][72] Junde Wu, Huihui Fang, Yu Zhang, Yehui Yang, and Yanwu Xu. Medsegdiff: Medical image segmentation with diffusion probabilistic model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.00611 , 2022. 1, 3, 7 - · arXiv
  61. [73][73] Junde Wu, Rao Fu, Huihui Fang, Yuanpei Liu, Zhaowei Wang, Yanwu Xu, Yueming Jin, and Tal Arbel. Medical sam adapter: Adapting segment anything model for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12620 , 2023. 3 - · arXiv
  62. [74][74] Junde Wu, Wei Ji, Huazhu Fu, Min Xu, Yueming Jin, and Yanwu Xu. Medsegdiff-v2: Diffusion-based medical image segmentation with transformer. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages 6030-6038, 2024. 1, 3 -
  63. [75][75] Zhongnuo Yan, Tong Han, Yuhao Huang, Lian Liu, Han Zhou, Jiongquan Chen, Wenlong Shi, Yan Cao, Xin Yang, and Dong Ni. A Foundation Model for General Moving Object Segmentation in Medical Images, 2024. arXiv:2309.17264. 7, 8 - · arXiv
  64. [76][76] Jinyu Yang, Mingqi Gao, Zhe Li, Shang Gao, Fangjing Wang, and Feng Zheng. Track Anything: Segment Anything Meets Videos, 2023. arXiv:2304.11968. 7, 8 - · arXiv
  65. [77][77] Kaidong Zhang et al. Customized segment anything model for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13785 , 2023. 7 - · arXiv
  66. [78][78] Amy Zhao, Guha Balakrishnan, Fredo Durand, John V Guttag, and Adrian V Dalca. Data augmentation using learned transformations for one-shot medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 8543-8553, 2019. 8 -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality

    Cosarinsky, M., Billot, R., Mansilla, L., Jimenez, G., Gaggión, N., Fu, G., Tirer, T., & Ferrante, E. (2025) · arXiv

    “To improve practicality and e ffi ciency, we incorporate In-Context RCA , which uses in-context learning segmentation models [9], [10], [11] that can perform new segmentation tasks by conditioning on a small set of labeled examples without requiring any additional training.”

Authors
Zhu, J., Hamdi, A., Qi, Y., Jin, Y., & Wu, J.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2408.00874
arXiv
2408.00874
OpenAlex
W4406301628
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
medical image segmentation, Segment Anything Model 2, video object tracking, 3D medical image segmentation, interactive segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review