Let Me Speak Freely? A Study on the Impact of Format Restrictions on Performance of Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Structured generation, the process of producing content in standardized formats like JSON and XML, is widely utilized in real-world applications to extract key output information from large language models (LLMs). This study investigates whether such constraints on generation space impact LLMs abilities, including reasoning and domain knowledge comprehension. Specifically, we evaluate LLMs performance when restricted to adhere to structured formats versus generating free-form responses across various common tasks. Surprisingly, we observe a significant decline in LLMs reasoning abilities under format restrictions. Furthermore, we find that stricter format constraints generally lead to greater performance degradation in reasoning tasks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLMs' reasoning abilities decline when they also have to adhere to formatting constraints.
“LLMs' reasoning abilities, for example, decline when they also have to adhere to formatting constraints [24].”
From Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Following (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877-1901.
- Yulin Chen, Ning Ding, Xiaobin Wang, Shengding Hu, Haitao Zheng, Zhiyuan Liu, and Pengjun Xie. 2023. Exploring lottery prompts for pre-trained language models. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 15428-15444.
- Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. 2021. Training verifiers to solve math word prob- lems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168. · arXiv
- Ahmad Ghazal, Tilmann Rabl, Minqing Hu, Francois Raab, Meikel Poess, Alain Crolotte, and Hans-Arno Jacobsen. 2013. Bigbench: Towards an industry stan- dard benchmark for big data analytics. In Proceed- ings of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD international confer- ence on Management of data, pages 1197-1208.
- Mingyu Jin, Qinkai Yu, Haiyan Zhao, Wenyue Hua, Yanda Meng, Yongfeng Zhang, Mengnan Du, et al. 2024. The impact of reasoning step length on large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04925. · arXiv
- Rasmus Kær Jørgensen, Oliver Brandt, Mareike Hart- mann, Xiang Dai, C. Igel, and Desmond Elliott. 2023. Multifin: A dataset for multilingual financial nlp. In ACL Findings.
- Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yu- taka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. 2022. Large lan- guage models are zero-shot reasoners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
- Terry Koo, Frederick Liu, and Luheng He. 2024. Automata-based constraints for language model de- coding. arXiv e-prints.
- Swaroop Mishra, Daniel Khashabi, Chitta Baral, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2022. Cross-task generaliza- tion via natural language crowdsourcing instructions. In ACL.
- Moran Mizrahi, Guy Kaplan, Dan Malkin, Rotem Dror, Dafna Shahaf, and Gabriel Stanovsky. 2024. State of what art? a call for multi-prompt llm evaluation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 12:933-949.
- Yiwei Qin, Kaiqiang Song, Yebowen Hu, Wenlin Yao, Sangwoo Cho, Xiaoyang Wang, Xuansheng Wu, Fei Liu, Pengfei Liu, and Dong Yu. 2024. Infobench: Evaluating instruction following ability in large lan- guage models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03601. · arXiv
- Melanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Alane Suhr. 2023. Quantifying language models' sensitiv- ity to spurious features in prompt design or: How i learned to start worrying about prompt formatting. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Arsène Fansi Tchango, Rishab Goel, Zhi Wen, Julien Martel, and Joumana Ghosn. 2022. Ddxplus: a new dataset for automatic medical diagnosis. In Proceed- ings of the 36th International Conference on Neu- ral Information Processing Systems, pages 31306- 31318.
- Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Yonghui Wu, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, et al. 2023. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805. · arXiv
- Gemma Team, Thomas Mesnard, Cassidy Hardin, Robert Dadashi, Surya Bhupatiraju, Shreya Pathak, Laurent Sifre, Morgane Rivière, Mihir Sanjay Kale, Juliette Love, et al. 2024. Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08295. · arXiv
- Xuezhi Wang and Denny Zhou. 2024. Chain-of- thought reasoning without prompting. ArXiv, abs/2402.10200. · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, An- drew M Dai, and Quoc V Le. 2021. Finetuned lan- guage models are zero-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01652. · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed H Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. 2022. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits rea- soning in large language models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
- Brandon T Willard and Rémi Louf. 2023. Efficient guided generation for large language models. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv-2307.
- Congying Xia, Chen Xing, Jiangshu Du, Xinyi Yang, Yihao Feng, Ran Xu, Wenpeng Yin, and Caim- ing Xiong. 2024. Fofo: A benchmark to evaluate llms' format-following capability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18667. · arXiv
- Jeffrey Zhou, Tianjian Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Sid- dhartha Brahma, Sujoy Basu, Yi Luan, Denny Zhou, and Le Hou. 2023. Instruction-following evalu- ation for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07911. · arXiv
- Kaijie Zhu, Jindong Wang, Jiaheng Zhou, Zichen Wang, Hao Chen, Yidong Wang, Linyi Yang, Wei Ye, Yue Zhang, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, et al. 2023. Prompt- bench: Towards evaluating the robustness of large lan- guage models on adversarial prompts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.04528. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generation
Zhang, J., Xiang, J., Yu, Z., Teng, F., Chen, X., Chen, J., Zhuge, M., Cheng, X., Hong, S., Wang, J., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.10762 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationGeneralizing Verifiable Instruction Following
Pyatkin, V., Malik, S., Graf, V., Ivison, H., Huang, S., Dasigi, P., Lambert, N., & Hajishirzi, H. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.02833 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
JSONSchemaBench: A Rigorous Benchmark of Structured Outputs for Language Models
Geng, S., Cooper, H., Moskal, M., Jenkins, S., Berman, J., Ranchin, N., West, R., Horvitz, E., & Nori, H. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.10868 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“However, things become more complicated due to ambiguity of tokenization [Vivien, 2024; GuidanceAI, 2024a; Geng et al., 2024] and the distributional shifts caused by the intervention [Geng et al., 2023; Tam et al., 2024].”
Influential
- Authors
- Tam, Z. R., Wu, C.-K., Tsai, Y.-L., Lin, C.-Y., Lee, H.-Y., & Chen, Y.-N.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2408.02442
- OpenAlex
- W4406302175
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- structured generation, large language models, LLM reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
