PreprintCited by 1Graph theory and applicationsComplexity and Algorithms in GraphsAdvanced Graph Theory Research

The Signatures of Ideal Flow Networks

Open access
Teknomo, Kardi·2024·arXiv

Abstract

An Ideal Flow Network (IFN) is a strongly connected network where relative flows are preserved (irreducible premagic matrix). IFN can be decomposed into canonical cycles to form a string code called network signature. A network signature can be composed back into an IFN by assignment and merging operations. Using string manipulations on network signatures, we can derive total flow, link values, sum of rows and columns, and probability matrices and test for irreducibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2408.06344

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The model can first determine a scale-invariant relative flow pattern, often represented as a cardinal network with the smallest possible integer flows.

    “This means the model can first determine a scale-invariant, relative flow pattern, often represented as a cardinal network (Fcardinal .) with the smallest possible integer flows [31].”

    From Classical Paradigm of Transportation Modeling (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

    Definition 5 and Proposition 2 (page unavailable) describe ideal flow networks as relative flows preserved under global scaling. Corollary 1 (page unavailable) describes scaling rational weights to obtain an integer flow matrix. The copy does not call this a “cardinal network” or establish that the resulting link flows are the smallest possible integers. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Ahuja, Ravindra K., Magnanti, Thomas L., and Orlin, James B. Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Ap- plications. Prentice Hall, 1993.
  2. Johnson, Donald B. "Finding all the elementary cir- cuits of a directed graph." SIAM Journal on Computing, 4(1):77-84, 1975.
  3. Tarjan, Robert Endre. "Depth-first search and lin- ear graph algorithms." SIAM Journal on Computing, 1(2):146-160, 1972.
  4. Bang-Jensen, Jørgen and Gutin, Gregory. Digraphs: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Springer, 2008.
  5. Gornitskii, A. A. Essential signatures and canonical bases of irreducible representations of the group G2. Mathe- matical Notes, 97(1): 98-112, 2015. Springer.
  6. Smith, John C. Canonical Forms for Linear Multivari- able Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 12(3): 233-241, 2008. IEEE.
  7. Deng, Shuiqing, Zhang, Wei, and Cui, Baoyang. Net- work representation learning: models, methods, and ap- plications. Discover Applied Sciences, 1(1): 77-93, 2020. Springer.
  8. Zhang, Wei, Cui, Baoyang, Ye, Zhonglin, and Liu, Zhen. A Network Representation Learning Model Based on Multiple Remodeling of Node Attributes. Mathematics, 11(23): 4788, 2023. MDPI.
  9. Seneta, E. Non-negative Matrices and Markov Chains. 2nd edition, Springer, New York, 1973.
  10. Horn, Roger A., and Johnson, Charles R. Matrix Analy- sis. Cambridge University Press, 2013, 2nd edition.
  11. --, "Premagic and ideal flow matrices," Data Sci- ence: Journal of Computing and Applied Informatics (JoCAI), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 35-45, 2019. [Online]. Avail- able: https://doi.org/10.32734/jocai.v3.i1-621 · DOI
  12. K. Teknomo, "Ideal flow of markov chain," Dis- crete Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications, vol. 10, no. 06, p. 1850073, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793830918500738 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teknomo, K.
Affiliations
University of the Philippines System (PH)
Corresponding author
Teknomo, Kardi
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402426785
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Graph theory and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Graph Theory Research
Keywords
network signatures, irreducibility, strongly connected networks, flow conservation, stochastic matrices, network decomposition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review