The DOI matches its DataCite record.
SWAP-less Implementation of Quantum Algorithms
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1103/2wzk-fnhx
Abstract
We present a formalism based on tracking the flow of parity quantum information to implement algorithms on devices with limited connectivity without qubit overhead, SWAP operations or shuttling. Instead, we leverage the fact that entangling gates not only manipulate quantum states but can also be exploited to transport quantum information. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method by applying it to the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) with $n$ qubits. This improves upon all state-of-the-art implementations of the QFT on a linear nearest-neighbor architecture, resulting in a total circuit depth of ${5n-3}$ and requiring ${n^2-1}$ CNOT gates. For the QAOA, our method outperforms SWAP networks, which are currently the most efficient implementation of the QAOA on a linear architecture. We further demonstrate the potential to balance qubit count against circuit depth by implementing the QAOA on twice the number of qubits using bi-linear connectivity, which approximately halves the circuit depth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The time to execute one layer of QAOA scales as O(2Nq+2) based on a flexible scheme that can be run in a 1D chain of qubits.
“and the time to execute one layer of QAOA scales as O (2 Nq + 2) basedona fl exible scheme that can be run in a 1D chain of qubits 31 .”
From Toward a linear-ramp QAOA protocol: evidence of a scaling advantage in solving some combinatorial optimization problems (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- [12]B. O'Gorman, W. J. Huggins, E. G. Rieffel, and K. B. Whaley, Generalized swap networks for near-term quantum computing (2019), arXiv:1905.05118 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- [18]A. Botea, A. Kishimoto, and R. Marinescu, On the complexity of quantum circuit compilation, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search , Vol. 9 (2018) pp. 138-142.
- [25]A. Messinger, M. Fellner, and W. Lechner, Constant depth code deformations in the parity architecture, in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (IEEE, 2023).
- [26]M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition , 10th ed. (Cambridge University Press, USA, 2011).
- [27]E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, A quantum approximate optimization algorithm (2014), arXiv:1411.4028 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- [31]R. Wille, L. Burgholzer, and A. Zulehner, Mapping Quantum Circuits to IBM QX Architectures Using the Minimal Number of SWAP and H Operations, in Proceedings of the 56th Annual Design Automation Conference 2019 , DAC '19 (ACM, 2019).
- [32]A. Kissinger and A. M. van de Griend, CNOT circuit extraction for topologically-constrained quantum memories (2019), arXiv:1904.00633 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- [34]A. Cowtan, S. Dilkes, R. Duncan, W. Simmons, and S. Sivarajah, Phase gadget synthesis for shallow circuits, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 318 , 213-228 (2020).
- [35]B. Klaver, K. Ludwig, A. Messinger, S. M. A. Rombouts, M. Fellner, K. Ender, and W. Lechner, The Parity Flow Formalism: Tracking Quantum Information Throughout Computation (2025), arXiv:2505.09468 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- [39]A. Bhattacharjee, C. Bandyopadhyay, R. Wille, R. Drechsler, and H. Rahaman, Improved look-ahead approaches for nearest neighbor synthesis of 1d quantum circuits, in 2019 32nd International Conference on VLSI Design and 2019 18th International Conference on Embedded Systems (VLSID) (2019) pp. 203-208.
- [42]K. Blekos, D. Brand, A. Ceschini, C.-H. Chou, R.-H. Li, K. Pandya, and A. Summer, A review on quantum approximate optimization algorithm and its variants (2023), arXiv:2306.09198 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- [46]Y.-J. Wang, Z.-Y. Chen, Y.-C. Wu, and G.-P. Guo, Resource-efficient circuit compilation for swap networks (2023), arXiv:2306.10250 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- [48]F. Dreier, C. Fleckenstein, G. Aigner, M. Fellner, R. Stahn, M. Lanthaler, and W. Lechner, Connectivity-aware Synthesis of Quantum Algorithms (2025), arXiv:2501.14020 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Montañez-Barrera, J. A., & Michielsen, K. (2025) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01082-1 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Klaver, B., Rombouts, S., Fellner, M., Messinger, A., Ender, K., Ludwig, K., & Lechner, W.
- Affiliations
- Universität Innsbruck (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Klaver, Berend
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2408.10907
- OpenAlex
- W4417268469
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 101017733)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (101017733)
- Austrian Science Fund (10.55776/F71, DOI 10.55776)
- Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (FO999909249)
- QuantERA (101017733)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- entangling gates, quantum information transfer, low connectivity, quantum Fourier transform, quantum approximate optimization algorithm, circuit depth, qubit overhead, quantum circuit compilation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review