CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

DAOs of Collective Intelligence? Unraveling the Complexity of Blockchain Governance in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations

Ballandies, Mark C., Carpentras, Dino, Pournaras, Evangelos·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2409.01823arXiv 2409.01823
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) have transformed organizational structures by shifting from traditional hierarchical control to decentralized approaches, leveraging blockchain and cryptoeconomics. Despite managing significant funds and building global networks, DAOs face challenges like declining participation, increasing centralization, and inabilities to adapt to changing environments, which stifle innovation. This paper explores DAOs as complex systems and applies complexity science to explain their inefficiencies. In particular, we discuss DAO challenges, their complex nature, and introduce the self-organization mechanisms of collective intelligence, digital democracy, and adaptation. By applying these mechanisms to refine DAO design and construction, a conceptual framework for assessing a DAO's viability is created. This contribution lays the foundation for future research at the intersection of complexity science, digital democracy and DAOs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2409.01823

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coordination among globally distributed members, coupled with the absence of a formal hierarchy, often requires innovative approaches for conflict resolution, long-term planning, and decision-making.

    “Coordination among globally distributed members, coupled with the absence of a formal hierarchy, often requires innovative approaches for conflict resolution, long-term planning, and decision-making (Law, 2021;Ballandies et al., 2024).”

    From Adapting Mintzberg’s organizational theory to DeSci: the decentralized science pyramid framework (2024) · cites this paper as Ballandies et al., 2024

  • Models such as Systems Theory and Network Theory lack the structural details and practical mechanisms needed to analyze and optimize operational processes within decentralized scientific ecosystems.

    “In contrast, models such as Systems Theory and Network Theory, while offering valuable perspectives on interrelations and network interactions, lack the structural details and practical mechanisms needed to analyze and optimize operational processes within decentralized scientific ecosystems (Napieralska and Kepczynski, 2024;Ballandies et al., 2024).”

    From Adapting Mintzberg’s organizational theory to DeSci: the decentralized science pyramid framework (2024) · cites this paper as Ballandies et al., 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Mark C Ballandies, Marcus M Dapp, Benjamin Aaron Degenhart, Dirk Helbing, Stefan Klauser, and Anabele-Linda Pardi. Finance 4.0-a socio-ecological finance system. In Finance 4.0-Towards a Socio- Ecological Finance System: A Participatory Framework to Promote Sustainability, pages 53-89. Springer International Publishing Cham, 2021.
  2. Mark C. Ballandies, Guangyao Li, and Claudio J. Tessone. Bitcoin, a dao? accepted for Second European DAO Workshop (DAWO), 2025.
  3. Mark C Ballandies, Hongyang Wang, Andrew Chung Chee Law, Joshua C Yang, Christophe Gösken, and Michael Andrew. A taxonomy for blockchain-based decentralized physical infrastructure networks (depin). In 2023 IEEE 9th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), pages 1-6. IEEE, 2023.
  4. H Spencer Banzhaf and Randall P Walsh. Do people vote with their feet? an empirical test of tiebout's mechanism. American economic review, 98(3):843-863, 2008.
  5. Brian Beckage, Stuart Kauffman, Louis J Gross, Asim Zia, and Christopher Koliba. More complex complexity: Exploring the nature of computational irreducibility across physical, biological, and human social systems. Irreducibility and Computational Equivalence: 10 Years After Wolfram's A New Kind of Science, pages 79-88, 2013.
  6. Cristiano Bellavitis, Christian Fisch, and Paul P Momtaz. The rise of decentralized autonomous orga- nizations (daos): a first empirical glimpse. Venture Capital, 25(2):187-203, 2023.
  7. Sven Brueckner and Hans Czap. Organization, self-organization, autonomy and emergence: Status and challenges. Int. Trans. Syst. Sci. Appl., 2(1):1-10, 2006.
  8. Dino Carpentras, Regula Hänggli Fricker, and Dirk Helbing. Empowering minorities and everyone in participatory budgeting: an agent-based modelling perspective. Philosophical Transactions A, 382(2285):20240090, 2024.
  9. Damon Centola. The network science of collective intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(11):923- 941, 2022.
  10. Francesco Maria De Collibus, Matija Piškorec, Alberto Partida, and Claudio J Tessone. The structural role of smart contracts and exchanges in the centralisation of ethereum-based cryptoassets. Entropy, 24(8):1048, 2022.
  11. Qinxu Ding, Daniel Liebau, Zhiguo Wang, and Weibiao Xu. A survey on decentralized autonomous organizations (daos) and their governance. World Scientific Annual Review of Fintech, 1:2350001, 2023.
  12. Youssef Faqir-Rhazoui, Javier Arroyo, and Samer Hassan. A comparative analysis of the platforms for decentralized autonomous organizations in the ethereum blockchain. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 12:1-20, 2021.
  13. Rainer Feichtinger, Robin Fritsch, Yann Vonlanthen, and Roger Wattenhofer. The hidden shortcom- ings of (d) aos-an empirical study of on-chain governance. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, pages 165-185. Springer, 2023.
  14. Mirta Galesic, Daniel Barkoczi, Andrew M Berdahl, Dora Biro, Giuseppe Carbone, Ilaria Giannoc- caro, Robert L Goldstone, Cleotilde Gonzalez, Anne Kandler, Albert B Kao, et al. Beyond collective intelligence: Collective adaptation. Journal of the Royal Society interface, 20(200):20220736, 2023.
  15. David Ha and Yujin Tang. Collective intelligence for deep learning: A survey of recent developments. Collective Intelligence, 1(1):26339137221114874, 2022.
  16. Regula Hänggli, Evangelos Pournaras, and Dirk Helbing. Human-centered democratic innovations with digital and participatory elements. In DG. O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pages 227-233, 2021.
  17. Dirk Helbing. Social self-organization: Agent-based simulations and experiments to study emergent social behavior. Springer, 2012.
  18. Dirk Helbing. Networked minds: Where human evolution is heading. Next Civilization: Digital Democ- racy and Socio-Ecological Finance-How to Avoid Dystopia and Upgrade Society by Digital Means, pages 175-196, 2021.
  19. Dirk Helbing. Next civilization: Digital democracy and socio-ecological finance-how to avoid dystopia and upgrade society by digital means. Springer Nature, 2021.
  20. Dirk Helbing and Carina Ines Hausladen. Socio-economic implications of the digital revolution. Helbing. D. and Hausladen, C.(2022), Socio-Economic Implications of the Digital Revolution, in: Chen, P., Elsner, W. and Pyka, A.(eds.), Handbook of Complexity Economics, Routledge, London, New York, 2022.
  21. Dirk Helbing and Dirk Helbing. The self-organizing society: Taking the future in our hands. Next Civ- ilization: Digital Democracy and Socio-Ecological Finance-How to Avoid Dystopia and Upgrade Society by Digital Means, pages 225-248, 2021.
  22. Dirk Helbing, Sachit Mahajan, Regula Hänggli Fricker, Andrea Musso, Carina I Hausladen, Cesare Carissimo, Dino Carpentras, Elisabeth Stockinger, Javier Argota Sanchez-Vaquerizo, Joshua C Yang, et al. Democracy by design: Perspectives for digitally assisted, participatory upgrades of society. Journal of Computational Science, 71:102061, 2023.
  23. Dirk Helbing and Evangelos Pournaras. Society: Build digital democracy. Nature, 527(7576):33-34, 2015.
  24. Francis Heylighen et al. The science of self-organization and adaptivity. The encyclopedia of life support systems, 5(3):253-280, 2001.
  25. Rashina Hoda and Latha K Murugesan. Multi-level agile project management challenges: A self- organizing team perspective. Journal of Systems and Software, 117:245-257, 2016.
  26. Rashina Hoda, James Noble, and Stuart Marshall. Organizing self-organizing teams. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering-Volume 1, pages 285-294, 2010.
  27. Lu Hong and Scott E Page. Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(46):16385-16389, 2004.
  28. Ying-Ying Hsieh, Jean-Philippe Vergne, Philip Anderson, Karim Lakhani, and Markus Reitzig. Bitcoin and the rise of decentralized autonomous organizations. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1):1-16, 2018.
  29. Yosef Jabareen. Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International journal of qualitative methods, 8(4):49-62, 2009.
  30. Dhananjay Jagtap, Alex Yen, Huanlei Wu, Aaron Schulman, and Pat Pannuto. Federated infrastructure: usage, patterns, and insights from" the people's network". In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference, pages 22-36, 2021.
  31. Jeffrey O Kephart and David M Chess. The vision of autonomic computing. Computer, 36(1):41-50, 2003.
  32. James Ladyman, James Lambert, and Karoline Wiesner. What is a complex system? European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3:33-67, 2013.
  33. Stefan Lämmer and Dirk Helbing. Self-control of traffic lights and vehicle flows in urban road networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(04):P04019, 2008.
  34. Zhuolun Li, Srijoni Majumdar, and Evangelos Pournaras. Blockchain-based decentralized time lock machines: Automated reveal of time-sensitive information. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05947, 2024. · arXiv
  35. Srijoni Majumdar and Evangelos Pournaras. Consensus-based participatory budgeting for legitimacy: Decision support via multi-agent reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, Optimization, and Data Science, pages 1-14. Springer, 2023.
  36. Richard P Mann and Dirk Helbing. Optimal incentives for collective intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(20):5077-5082, 2017.
  37. Andrea Peña-Calvin, Jorge Saldivar, Javier Arroyo, and Samer Hassan. A categorization of decentralized autonomous organizations: the case of the aragon platform. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2023.
  38. Evangelos Pournaras. Proof of witness presence: Blockchain consensus for augmented democracy in smart cities. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 145:160-175, 2020.
  39. Olivier Rikken, Marijn Janssen, and Zenlin Kwee. Governance challenges of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations. Information Polity, 24(4):397-417, 2019.
  40. Carlos P Roca, Moez Draief, and Dirk Helbing. Percolate or die: Multi-percolation decides the struggle between competing innovations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1101.0775, 2011. · arXiv
  41. Uwe Serdült. The referendum experience in switzerland. The Palgrave Handbook of European Referen- dums, pages 203-224, 2021.
  42. Vivek Kumar Singh, Divya Gautam, Rishi Raj Singh, and Ashok K Gupta. Agent-based computa- tional modeling of emergent collective intelligence. In Computational Collective Intelligence. Semantic Web, Social Networks and Multiagent Systems: First International Conference, ICCCI 2009, Wroc law, Poland, October 5-7, 2009. Proceedings 1, pages 240-251. Springer, 2009.
  43. Vivek Kumar Singh, Divya Gautam, Rishi Raj Singh, and Ashok K Gupta. Agent-based computa- tional modeling of emergent collective intelligence. In Computational Collective Intelligence. Semantic Web, Social Networks and Multiagent Systems: First International Conference, ICCCI 2009, Wroc law, Poland, October 5-7, 2009. Proceedings 1, pages 240-251. Springer, 2009.
  44. Vivek Kumar Singh and Ashok K Gupta. From artificial to collective intelligence: Perspectives and im- plications. In 2009 5th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics, pages 545-550. IEEE, 2009.
  45. Shweta Suran, Vishwajeet Pattanaik, and Dirk Draheim. Frameworks for collective intelligence: A systematic literature review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(1):1-36, 2020.
  46. David Waddington. The madness of the mob? explaining the 'irrationality'and destructiveness of crowd violence. Sociology Compass, 2(2):675-687, 2008.
  47. Daniel S Weld, Christopher H Lin, and Jonathan Bragg. Artificial intelligence and collective intelligence. Handbook of collective intelligence, pages 89-114, 2015.
  48. Thomas Welling, Fatemeh Banaie Heravan, Abhinav Sharma, Lodewijk Gelauff, Regula Haenggli, and Evangelos Pournaras. Fair and inclusive participatory budgeting: Voter experience with cumulative and quadratic voting interfaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04345, 2023. · arXiv
  49. Max Wolf, Jens Krause, Patricia A Carney, Andy Bogart, and Ralf HJM Kurvers. Collective in- telligence meets medical decision-making: the collective outperforms the best radiologist. PloS one, 10(8):e0134269, 2015.
  50. Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W Malone. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. science, 330(6004):686- 688, 2010.
  51. Barbara Wyrzykowska. Teal organizations: Literature reviewand future research directions. Central European Management Journal, 27(4):124-141, 2019.
  52. Joshua C Yang and Fynn Bachmann. Bridging voting and deliberation with algorithms: Field insights from vtaiwan and kultur komitee. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05017, 2025. · arXiv
  53. Joshua C Yang, Carina I Hausladen, Dominik Peters, Evangelos Pournaras, Regula Haenggli Fricker, and Dirk Helbing. Designing digital voting systems for citizens: Achieving fairness and legitimacy in digital participatory budgeting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03501, 2023. · arXiv
  54. Joshua C Yang, Carina I Hausladen, Dominik Peters, Evangelos Pournaras, Regula Hnggli Fricker, and Dirk Helbing. Designing digital voting systems for citizens: Achieving fairness and legitimacy in participatory budgeting. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 5(3):1-30, 2024.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ballandies, M. C., Carpentras, D., & Pournaras, E.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2409.01823
arXiv
2409.01823
References
0
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review