Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 6Music Technology and Sound StudiesMusic and Audio ProcessingMusicology and Musical Analysis

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Applications and Advances of Artificial Intelligence in Music Generation:A Review

Open access
Chen, Yanxu, Huang, Linshu, Gou, Tian·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2409.03715arXiv 2409.03715
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant progress in the field of music generation, driving innovation in music creation and applications. This paper provides a systematic review of the latest research advancements in AI music generation, covering key technologies, models, datasets, evaluation methods, and their practical applications across various fields. The main contributions of this review include: (1) presenting a comprehensive summary framework that systematically categorizes and compares different technological approaches, including symbolic generation, audio generation, and hybrid models, helping readers better understand the full spectrum of technologies in the field; (2) offering an extensive survey of current literature, covering emerging topics such as multimodal datasets and emotion expression evaluation, providing a broad reference for related research; (3) conducting a detailed analysis of the practical impact of AI music generation in various application domains, particularly in real-time interaction and interdisciplinary applications, offering new perspectives and insights; (4) summarizing the existing challenges and limitations of music quality evaluation methods and proposing potential future research directions, aiming to promote the standardization and broader adoption of evaluation techniques. Through these innovative summaries and analyses, this paper serves as a comprehensive reference tool for researchers and practitioners in AI music generation, while also outlining future directions for the field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2409.03715

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 111

  1. Agarwal, G.; and Om, H. 2021. An efficient supervised framework for music mood recognition using autoencoder- based optimised support vector regression model. IET Sig- nal Processing, 15(2): 98-121.
  2. Agostinelli, A.; Denk, T. I.; Borsos, Z.; Engel, J.; Verzetti, M.; Caillon, A.; Huang, Q.; Jansen, A.; Roberts, A.; Tagliasacchi, M.; et al. 2023. Musiclm: Generating music from text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11325. · arXiv
  3. Aljanaki, A.; Yang, Y.-H.; and Soleymani, M. 2017. Devel- oping a benchmark for emotional analysis of music. PloS one, 12(3): e0173392.
  4. Ardila, R.; Branson, M.; Davis, K.; Henretty, M.; Kohler, M.; Meyer, J.; Morais, R.; Saunders, L.; Tyers, F. M.; and Weber, G. 2019. Common voice: A massively-multilingual speech corpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06670. · arXiv
  5. Ellis, D. P.; Whitman, B.; and Lamere, P. 2011. The million song dataset. No Journal Information Available.
  6. Boulanger-Lewandowski, N.; Bengio, Y.; and Vincent, P. 2012. Modeling temporal dependencies in high-dimensional sequences: Application to polyphonic music generation and transcription. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.6392. · arXiv
  7. Briot, J.-P.; Hadjeres, G.; and Pachet, F.-D. 2017. Deep learning techniques for music generation-a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.01620. · arXiv
  8. Briot, J.-P.; Hadjeres, G.; and Pachet, F.-D. 2020. Deep learning techniques for music generation, volume 1. Springer.
  9. Brunner, G.; Konrad, A.; Wang, Y.; and Wattenhofer, R. 2018. MIDI-VAE: Modeling Dynamics and Instru- mentation of Music with Applications to Style Transfer. arXiv:1809.07600. · arXiv
  10. Chen, J.; Tan, X.; Luan, J.; Qin, T.; and Liu, T.-Y. 2020a. Hifisinger: Towards high-fidelity neural singing voice syn- thesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.01776. · arXiv
  11. Chen, N.; Zhang, Y.; Zen, H.; Weiss, R. J.; Norouzi, M.; and Chan, W. 2020b. Wavegrad: Estimating gradients for waveform generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.00713. · arXiv
  12. Chu, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Lim, H.; Lee, H.; Jin, S.; Lee, J.; Kim, T.; and Ko, S. 2022. An empirical study on how peo- ple perceive AI-generated music. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowl- edge Management, 304-314.
  13. Cífka, O.; S ¸ims ¸ekli, U.; and Richard, G. 2020. Groove2groove: One-shot music style transfer with supervision from synthetic data. IEEE/ACM Transac- tions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 28: 2638-2650.
  14. Conklin, D. 2003. Music generation from statistical models. In Proceedings of the AISB 2003 Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Creativity in the Arts and Sciences, 30-35.
  15. Copet, J.; Kreuk, F.; Gat, I.; Remez, T.; Kant, D.; Synnaeve, G.; Adi, Y.; and Défossez, A. 2024. Simple and Controllable Music Generation. arXiv:2306.05284. · arXiv
  16. Cuthbert, M. S.; and Ariza, C. 2010. music21: A toolkit for computer-aided musicology and symbolic music data. No Journal Information Available.
  17. Dash, A.; and Agres, K. 2023. AI-Based Affective Music Generation Systems: A Review of Methods and Challenges. ACM Computing Surveys.
  18. Defferrard, M.; Benzi, K.; Vandergheynst, P.; and Bres- son, X. 2017. FMA: A Dataset For Music Analysis. arXiv:1612.01840. · arXiv
  19. D'Errico, M. A. 2016. Interface Aesthetics: Sound, Soft- ware, and the Ecology of Digital Audio Production. Ph.d. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, Los An- geles.
  20. Deruty, E.; Grachten, M.; Lattner, S.; Nistal, J.; and Aouameur, C. 2022. On the development and practice of ai technology for contemporary popular music production. Transactions of the International Society for Music Infor- mation Retrieval, 5(1): 35-50.
  21. Dhariwal, P.; Jun, H.; Payne, C.; Kim, J. W.; Radford, A.; and Sutskever, I. 2020. Jukebox: A Generative Model for Music. arXiv preprint.
  22. Donahue, C.; Mao, H. H.; Li, Y. E.; Cottrell, G. W.; and McAuley, J. 2019. LakhNES: Improving multi-instrumental music generation with cross-domain pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.04868. · arXiv
  23. Donahue, C.; McAuley, J.; and Puckette, M. 2019. Adver- sarial Audio Synthesis. arXiv:1802.04208. · arXiv
  24. Dong, H.-W.; Hsiao, W.-Y.; Yang, L.-C.; and Yang, Y.-H. 2018. Musegan: Multi-track sequential generative adversar- ial networks for symbolic music generation and accompani- ment. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 32.
  25. Engel, J.; Hantrakul, L.; Gu, C.; and Roberts, A. 2020. DDSP: Differentiable digital signal processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04643. · arXiv
  26. Engel, J.; Resnick, C.; Roberts, A.; Dieleman, S.; Norouzi, M.; Eck, D.; and Simonyan, K. 2017. Neural audio syn- thesis of musical notes with wavenet autoencoders. In In- ternational Conference on Machine Learning, 1068-1077.
  27. PMLR.
  28. Fonseca, E.; Pons Puig, J.; Favory, X.; Font Corbera, F.; Bogdanov, D.; Ferraro, A.; Oramas, S.; Porter, A.; and Serra, X. 2017. Freesound datasets: a platform for the creation of open audio datasets. In Hu X, Cunningham SJ, Turn- bull D, Duan Z, editors. Proceedings of the 18th ISMIR Conference; 2017 oct 23-27; Suzhou, China.[Canada]: In- ternational Society for Music Information Retrieval; 2017. p. 486-93. International Society for Music Information Re- trieval (ISMIR).
  29. Ford, C.; Noel-Hirst, A.; Cardinale, S.; Loth, J.; Sarmento, P.; Wilson, E.; others; and Bryan-Kinns, N. 2024. Reflection Across AI-based Music Composition. No Journal Informa- tion Available.
  30. Forsgren, S.; and Martiros, H. 2022. Riffusion -Stable diffu- sion for real-time music generation. No Journal Information Available.
  31. Gemmeke, J. F.; Ellis, D. P.; Freedman, D.; Jansen, A.; Lawrence, W.; Moore, R. C.; Plakal, M.; and Ritter, M. 2017. Audio set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events. In 2017 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), 776-780. IEEE.
  32. Gillick, J.; Roberts, A.; Engel, J.; Eck, D.; and Bamman, D. 2019. Learning to groove with inverse sequence transfor- mations. In International conference on machine learning, 2269-2279. PMLR.
  33. Goodfellow, I. 2016. Deep learning, volume 196. MIT press.
  34. Pouget-Abadie, J.; Mirza, M.; Xu, B.; Warde-Farley, D.; Ozair, S.; Courville, A.; and Bengio, Y. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural in- formation processing systems, 27.
  35. Hadjeres, G.; Pachet, F.; and Nielsen, F. 2017a. DeepBach: a Steerable Model for Bach Chorales Generation. In Pre- cup, D.; and Teh, Y. W., eds., Proceedings of the 34th In- ternational Conference on Machine Learning, volume 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 1362-1371.
  36. PMLR.
  37. Hadjeres, G.; Pachet, F.; and Nielsen, F. 2017b. Deepbach: a steerable model for bach chorales generation. In Interna- tional conference on machine learning, 1362-1371.
  38. PMLR.
  39. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Friedman, J. H.; and Friedman, J. H. 2009. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, volume 2. Springer.
  40. Hawthorne, C.; Stasyuk, A.; Roberts, A.; Simon, I.; Huang, C.-Z. A.; Dieleman, S.; Elsen, E.; Engel, J.; and Eck, D. 2018. Enabling factorized piano music modeling and generation with the MAESTRO dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.12247. · arXiv
  41. Hernandez-Olivan, C.; and Beltran, J. R. 2022. Music Com- position with Deep Learning: A Review. In Advances in Speech and Music Technology: Computational Aspects and Applications, 25-50. No Publisher Information Available.
  42. Herremans, D.; Chew, E.; et al. 2016. Tension ribbons: Quantifying and visualising tonal tension. No Journal In- formation Available.
  43. Herremans, D.; Chuan, C.-H.; and Chew, E. 2017. A func- tional taxonomy of music generation systems. ACM Com- puting Surveys (CSUR), 50(5): 1-30.
  44. Ho, J.; Jain, A.; and Abbeel, P. 2020. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems, 33: 6840-6851.
  45. Holmes, T. 2012. Electronic and Experimental Music: Tech- nology, Music, and Culture. New York: Routledge, 4th edi- tion. ISBN 9780203128428.
  46. Horning, S. S. 2013. Chasing Sound: Technology, Cul- ture, and the Art of Studio Recording from Edison to the LP. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 9781421410234.
  47. Hracs, B. J.; Seman, M.; and Virani, T. E., eds. 2016. The Production and Consumption of Music in the Digital Age, volume 5. New York: Routledge.
  48. Hu, X.; and Yang, Y.-H. 2017. Cross-dataset and cross- cultural music mood prediction: A case on western and chi- nese pop songs. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 8(2): 228-240.
  49. Huang, C.-Z. A.; Vaswani, A.; Uszkoreit, J.; Shazeer, N.; Simon, I.; Hawthorne, C.; Dai, A. M.; Hoffman, M. D.; Din- culescu, M.; and Eck, D. 2018a. Music transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.04281. · arXiv
  50. Huang, C.-Z. A.; Vaswani, A.; Uszkoreit, J.; Shazeer, N.; Simon, I.; Hawthorne, C.; Dai, A. M.; Hoffman, M. D.; Dinculescu, M.; and Eck, D. 2018b. Music Transformer. arXiv:1809.04281. · arXiv
  51. Huang, Q.; Park, D. S.; Wang, T.; Denk, T. I.; Ly, A.; Chen, N.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, J.; Frank, C.; et al. 2023a. Noise2music: Text-conditioned music generation with dif- fusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03917. · arXiv
  52. Huang, W.-C.; Violeta, L. P.; Liu, S.; Shi, J.; and Toda, T. 2023b. The singing voice conversion challenge 2023. In 2023 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understand- ing Workshop (ASRU), 1-8. IEEE.
  53. Huang, Y.-S.; and Yang, Y.-H. 2020. Pop music transformer: Beat-based modeling and generation of expressive pop piano compositions. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia, 1180-1188.
  54. Huron, D. 2008. Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychol- ogy of expectation. MIT press.
  55. Ji, S.; Yang, X.; and Luo, J. 2023. A survey on deep learn- ing for symbolic music generation: Representations, algo- rithms, evaluations, and challenges. ACM Computing Sur- veys, 56(1): 1-39.
  56. Juslin, P. N.; and Sloboda, J. 2011. Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications. Oxford University Press.
  57. Katz, M. 2010. Capturing sound: How technology has changed music. Univ of California Press.
  58. Kim, Y. E.; Schmidt, E. M.; Migneco, R.; Morton, B. G.; Richardson, P.; Scott, J.; Speck, J. A.; and Turnbull, D. 2010. Music emotion recognition: A state of the art review. In Proc. ismir, volume 86, 937-952.
  59. Kong, Q.; Li, B.; Chen, J.; and Wang, Y. 2020a. Giantmidi- piano: A large-scale midi dataset for classical piano music. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.07061. · arXiv
  60. Kong, Z.; Ping, W.; Huang, J.; Zhao, K.; and Catanzaro, B. 2020b. Diffwave: A versatile diffusion model for audio syn- thesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09761. · arXiv
  61. Lei, W.; Wang, J.; Ma, F.; Huang, G.; and Liu, L. 2024. A Comprehensive Survey on Human Video Gener- ation: Challenges, Methods, and Insights. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08428. · arXiv
  62. Li, B.; Liu, X.; Dinesh, K.; Duan, Z.; and Sharma, G. 2018. Creating a multitrack classical music performance dataset for multimodal music analysis: Challenges, insights, and ap- plications. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 21(2): 522- 535.
  63. Liang, F. 2016. Bachbot: Automatic Composition in the Style of Bach Chorales. University of Cambridge, 8(3.1): 19-48.
  64. Loy, G.; and Abbott, C. 1985. Programming languages for computer music synthesis, performance, and composition. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 17(2): 235-265.
  65. Lu, C.; and Dubnov, S. 2021. ChordGAN: Symbolic music style transfer with chroma feature extraction. In Proceed- ings of the 2nd Conference on AI Music Creativity (AIMC), Online, 18-22.
  66. Lu, P.; Xu, X.; Kang, C.; Yu, B.; Xing, C.; Tan, X.; and Bian, J. 2023. Musecoco: Generating symbolic music from text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00110. · arXiv
  67. Luo, J.; Yang, X.; Ji, S.; and Li, J. 2020. MG-VAE: deep Chinese folk songs generation with specific regional styles. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Sound and Mu- sic Technology (CSMT) Revised Selected Papers, 93-106.
  68. Manilow, E.; Wichern, G.; Seetharaman, P.; and Le Roux, J. 2019. Cutting music source separation some Slakh: A dataset to study the impact of training data quality and quan- tity. In 2019 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Pro- cessing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA), 45-49. IEEE.
  69. Marschall, O. A. 2007. Machine Composition-Between Lisp and Max: Between AI and Music. Master's thesis, Lisp, Max, maxlisp and other recombinations. Master's thesis.
  70. Miranda, E. R. 1995. An artificial intelligence approach to sound design. Computer Music Journal, 19(2): 59-75.
  71. Moysis, L.; Iliadis, L. A.; Sotiroudis, S. P.; Boursianis, A. D.; Papadopoulou, M. S.; Kokkinidis, K.-I. D.; Volos, C.; Sarigiannidis, P.; Nikolaidis, S.; and Goudos, S. K. 2023. Music deep learning: deep learning methods for music sig- nal processing-a review of the state-of-the-art. Ieee Access, 11: 17031-17052.
  72. Oliver, P. G.; and Lalchev, S. 2022. Digital transformation in the music industry: how the COVID-19 pandemic has ac- celerated new business opportunities. In Rethinking the Mu- sic Business: Music Contexts, Rights, Data, and COVID-19, 55-72. Springer.
  73. Oord, A. v. d.; Dieleman, S.; Zen, H.; Simonyan, K.; Vinyals, O.; Graves, A.; Kalchbrenner, N.; Senior, A.; and Kavukcuoglu, K. 2016. Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03499. · arXiv
  74. Pachet, F. 2003. The continuator: Musical interaction with style. Journal of New Music Research, 32(3): 333-341.
  75. Papadopoulos, A.; Roy, P.; and Pachet, F. 2016. Assisted lead sheet composition using flowcomposer. In Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming: 22nd Interna- tional Conference, CP 2016, Toulouse, France, September 5-9, 2016, Proceedings 22, 769-785. Springer.
  76. Penha, C.; and Cozman, F. G. 2015. The AMG1608 dataset for music emotion recognition. In 2015 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Process- ing (ICASSP), 717-721. Brisbane, Australia: IEEE.
  77. Picard, R. W. 2000. Affective computing. MIT press.
  78. Pinch, T.; and Bijsterveld, K. 2012. The Oxford handbook of sound studies. OUP USA.
  79. Pinch, T.; and Trocco, F. 2004. The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer. Cambridge, MA and London, Eng- land: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674042162.
  80. Privato, N.; Rampado, O.; and Novello, A. 2022. A Cre- ative Tool for the Musician Combining LSTM and Markov Chains in Max/MSP. In International Conference on Com- putational Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design (Part of EvoStar), 228-242. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  81. Qian, Y.; Wang, T.; Tong, X.; Jin, X.; Xu, D.; Zheng, B.; Ge, T.; Yu, F.; and Zhu, S.-C. 2024. MusicAOG: an Energy-Based Model for Learning and Sampling a Hierar- chical Representation of Symbolic Music. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02678. · arXiv
  82. Radford, A.; Metz, L.; and Chintala, S. 2016. Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Genera- tive Adversarial Networks. arXiv:1511.06434. · arXiv
  83. Rambarran, S. 2021. Virtual Music: Sound, Music, and Im- age in the Digital Era. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  84. Reimer, B. 1991. A philosophy of music education. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 49(3).
  85. Reuter, A. 2022. Who let the DAWs out? The digital in a new generation of the digital audio workstation. Popular Music and Society, 45(2): 113-128.
  86. Schneider, F.; Kamal, O.; Jin, Z.; and Schölkopf, B. 2024. Moûsai: Efficient Text-to-Music Diffusion Models. In Ku, L.-W.; Martins, A.; and Srikumar, V., eds., Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 8050-8068. Bangkok, Thailand: Association for Computational Linguis- tics.
  87. Sloboda, J. A. 1991. Music structure and emotional re- sponse: Some empirical findings. Psychology of music, 19(2): 110-120.
  88. Soleymani, M.; Caro, M. N.; Schmidt, E. M.; Sha, C.-Y.; and Yang, Y.-H. 2013. 1000 songs for emotional analysis of mu- sic. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on Crowdsourcing for multimedia, 1-6.
  89. Standley, J. M. 1986. Music research in medical/dental treat- ment: meta-analysis and clinical applications. Journal of music therapy, 23(2): 56-122.
  90. Stefani, G. 1987. Melody: a popular perspective. Popular Music, 6(1): 21-35.
  91. Stöter, F.-R.; Liutkus, A.; and Ito, N. 2018. The 2018 signal separation evaluation campaign. In Latent Variable Anal- ysis and Signal Separation: 14th International Conference, LVA/ICA 2018, Guildford, UK, July 2-5, 2018, Proceedings 14, 293-305. Springer.
  92. Tan, X.; and Li, X. 2021. A Tutorial on AI Music Composi- tion. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Confer- ence on Multimedia, 5678-5680.
  93. Tanev, G.; and Božinovski, A. 2013. Virtual Studio Technol- ogy Inside Music Production. In International Conference on ICT Innovations, 231-241. Heidelberg: Springer Interna- tional Publishing.
  94. Tao, F. 2022. A New Harmonisation of Art and Tech- nology: Philosophic Interpretations of Artificial Intelligence Art. Critical Arts, 36(1-2): 110-125.
  95. Taylor, J.; Ardeliya, V. E.; and Wolfson, J. 2024. Exploration of Artificial Intelligence in Creative Fields: Generative Art, Music, and Design. International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management, 4(1): 39-45.
  96. Théberge, P. 2021. Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Technology. Wesleyan University Press.
  97. Toiviainen, P.; and Eerola, T. 2006. Autocorrelation in meter induction: The role of accent structure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(2): 1164-1170.
  98. Topirceanu, A.; Barina, G.; and Udrescu, M. 2014. Musenet: Collaboration in the music artists industry. In 2014 Euro- pean Network Intelligence Conference, 89-94. IEEE.
  99. Turnbull, D.; Barrington, L.; Torres, D.; and Lanckriet, G. 2007. Towards musical query-by-semantic-description us- ing the cal500 data set. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and de- velopment in information retrieval, 439-446.
  100. van den Oord, A.; Dieleman, S.; Zen, H.; Simonyan, K.; Vinyals, O.; Graves, A.; Kalchbrenner, N.; Senior, A.; and Kavukcuoglu, K. 2016. WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio. arXiv:1609.03499. · arXiv
  101. Vaswani, A. 2017. Attention is all you need. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03762. · arXiv
  102. Wang, L.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, H.; Pang, J.; Qin, Y.; and Wu, Q. 2024. A review of intelligent music generation systems. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(12): 6381-6401.
  103. Wang, Y. 2017. The Design and Study of Virtual Sound Field in Music Production. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 22(7): 83-91.
  104. Wang, Z.; Min, L.; and Xia, G. 2024. Whole-song hierarchi- cal generation of symbolic music using cascaded diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09901. · arXiv
  105. Wu, Y.; Manilow, E.; Deng, Y.; Swavely, R.; Kastner, K.; Cooijmans, T.; Courville, A.; Huang, C.-Z. A.; and En- gel, J. 2021. MIDI-DDSP: Detailed control of musical performance via hierarchical modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09312. · arXiv
  106. Xenakis, I. 1992. Formalized music: thought and mathemat- ics in composition. 6. Pendragon Press.
  107. Yang, L.-C.; Chou, S.-Y.; and Yang, Y.-H. 2017. MidiNet: A convolutional generative adversarial network for symbolic- domain music generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.10847. · arXiv
  108. Yang, R.; Chen, T.; Zhang, Y.; and Xia, G. 2019. Inspecting and interacting with meaningful music representations using VAE. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08842. · arXiv
  109. Yang, Y.-H.; and Chen, H. H. 2012. Machine recognition of music emotion: A review. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 3(3): 1-30.
  110. Zak III, A. J. 2001. The poetics of rock: Cutting tracks, mak- ing records. Univ of California Press.
  111. Zhang, N.; Yan, J.; and Briot, J.-P. 2023. Artificial intelli- gence techniques for pop music creation: A real music pro- duction perspective. No Journal Information Available.

Cited by

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Y., Huang, L., & Gou, T.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2409.03715
arXiv
2409.03715
OpenAlex
W4403524603
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Musicology and Musical Analysis
Keywords
AI music generation, symbolic music generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.