PreprintCited by 1Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and Applications

High-fidelity heralded quantum state preparation and measurement

Open access
Sotirova, A. S., Leppard, J. D., Vazquez-Brennan, A., Decoppet, S. M., Pokorny, F., Malinowski, M., Ballance, C. J.·2024·arXiv

Abstract

We present a novel protocol for high-fidelity qubit state preparation and measurement (SPAM) that combines standard SPAM methods with a series of in-sequence measurements to detect and remove errors. The protocol can be applied in any quantum system with a long-lived (metastable) level and a means to detect population outside of this level without coupling to it. We demonstrate the use of the protocol for three different qubit encodings in a single trapped $^{137}\mathrm{Ba}^+$ ion. For all three, we achieve the lowest reported SPAM infidelities of $7(4) \times 10^{-6}$ (optical qubit), $5(4) \times 10^{-6}$ (metastable-level qubit), and $8(4) \times 10^{-6}$ (ground-level qubit).

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2409.05805

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 1,762-nm laser enables a ternary (three-outcome) measurement to detect leakage population without the use of ancillas or 2Q gates.

    “Furthermore, the 1,762-nm laser is used to protect neighbouring qubits from measurement crosstalk errors (Extended Data Fig. 1b) and enables a ternary (three-outcome) measurement to detect leakage population (Extended Data Fig. 1c) without the use of ancillas or 2Q gates79–81.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sotirova, A. S., Leppard, J. D., Vazquez-Brennan, A., Decoppet, S. M., Pokorny, F., Malinowski, M., & Ballance, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403619021
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • UK Research and Innovation (MR/S03238X/1)
  • Balliol College, University of Oxford
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
metastable levels, trapped-ion qubits, optical qubits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review