High-fidelity heralded quantum state preparation and measurement
Open accessAbstract
We present a novel protocol for high-fidelity qubit state preparation and measurement (SPAM) that combines standard SPAM methods with a series of in-sequence measurements to detect and remove errors. The protocol can be applied in any quantum system with a long-lived (metastable) level and a means to detect population outside of this level without coupling to it. We demonstrate the use of the protocol for three different qubit encodings in a single trapped $^{137}\mathrm{Ba}^+$ ion. For all three, we achieve the lowest reported SPAM infidelities of $7(4) \times 10^{-6}$ (optical qubit), $5(4) \times 10^{-6}$ (metastable-level qubit), and $8(4) \times 10^{-6}$ (ground-level qubit).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 1,762-nm laser enables a ternary (three-outcome) measurement to detect leakage population without the use of ancillas or 2Q gates.
“Furthermore, the 1,762-nm laser is used to protect neighbouring qubits from measurement crosstalk errors (Extended Data Fig. 1b) and enables a ternary (three-outcome) measurement to detect leakage population (Extended Data Fig. 1c) without the use of ancillas or 2Q gates79–81.”
From A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity (2026) · cites this paper as [80]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity
Ransford, A., Allman, M. S., Arkinstall, J., Campora, J. P., Cooper, S. F., Delaney, R. D., Dreiling, J. M., Estey, B., Figgatt, C., Hall, A., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10676-4 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sotirova, A. S., Leppard, J. D., Vazquez-Brennan, A., Decoppet, S. M., Pokorny, F., Malinowski, M., & Ballance, C. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2409.05805
- OpenAlex
- W4403619021
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- UK Research and Innovation (MR/S03238X/1)
- Balliol College, University of Oxford
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- metastable levels, trapped-ion qubits, optical qubits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review