PreprintCited by 1Music and Audio ProcessingSpeech Recognition and SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Enhancing Temporal Understanding in Audio Question Answering for Large Audio Language Models

Open access
Sridhar, Arvind Krishna, Guo, Yinyi, Visser, Erik·2024·arXiv

Abstract

The Audio Question Answering (AQA) task includes audio event classification, audio captioning, and open-ended reasoning. Recently, AQA has garnered attention due to the advent of Large Audio Language Models (LALMs). Current literature focuses on constructing LALMs by integrating audio encoders with text-only Large Language Models (LLMs) through a projection module. While LALMs excel in general audio understanding, they are limited in temporal reasoning, which may hinder their commercial applications and on-device deployment. This paper addresses these challenges and limitations in audio temporal reasoning. First, we introduce a data augmentation technique for generating reliable audio temporal questions and answers using an LLM. Second, we perform a further fine-tuning of an existing baseline using curriculum learning strategy to specialize in temporal reasoning without compromising performance on fine-tuned tasks. We demonstrate the performance of our model using state-of-the-art LALMs on public audio benchmark datasets. Third, we implement our AQA model on-device locally and investigate its CPU inference for edge applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2409.06223

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Building a unified audio-language model remains challenging because different tasks depend on different levels of acoustic abstraction, and many tasks are inherently temporal.

    “Building such a unified model remains challenging. Different tasks depend on different levels of acoustic abstraction: ASR requires fine-grained phonetic and lexical information, speech captioning relies on prosody and speaker attributes, environmental sound understanding often depends on short transient events, and reasoning-oriented tasks require semantic integration over longer contexts [1, 6,”

    From MOSS-Audio Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

  • Explicit time markers make temporal information part of the model context, enabling timestamped transcription and time-aware audio question answering to be learned directly through generation.

    “Rather than treating timestamps as external post-processing, MOSS-Audio makes temporal information part of the model context, enabling timestamped transcription and time-aware audio question answering to be learned directly through generation [5, 13].”

    From MOSS-Audio Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • MOSS-Audio Technical Report

    Yang, C., Yu, C., Chen, H., Zhu, J., Chen, J., Chen, K., Wang, W., Wang, Y., Jiang, Y., Jiang, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.01802

    “Moreover, many audio-language tasks are inherently temporal, requiring the model to determine not only what happens but also when it happens [13–15].”

Authors
Sridhar, A. K., Guo, Y., & Visser, E.
Affiliations
Qualcomm (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403661516
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
audio question answering, large audio language models, temporal reasoning, data augmentation, curriculum learning, audio captioning, sound event classification, on-device inference, edge deployment, audio encoder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review