$\textit{SKIntern}$: Internalizing Symbolic Knowledge for Distilling Better CoT Capabilities into Small Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Small Language Models (SLMs) are attracting attention due to the high computational demands and privacy concerns of Large Language Models (LLMs). Some studies fine-tune SLMs using Chains of Thought (CoT) data distilled from LLMs, aiming to enhance their reasoning ability. Furthermore, Some CoT distillation methods introduce external symbolic knowledge into the generation process to improve the limited knowledge memory, reasoning ability and out-of-domain (OOD) generalization of SLMs. However, the introduction of symbolic knowledge increases computational overhead and introduces potential noise. In this paper, we introduce $\textit{SKIntern}$, an innovative approach that empowers SLMs to internalize symbolic knowledge and few-shot examples gradually through a progressive fine-tuning process, guided by a predefined linear decay schedule under curriculum learning. By efficiently internalizing knowledge, $\textit{SKIntern}$ reduces computational overhead and speeds up the reasoning process by focusing solely on the question during inference. It outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by over 5\%, while reducing inference costs (measured in FLOPs) by up to $4\times$ across a wide range of SLMs in both in-domain (ID) and out-of-domain (OOD) tasks. Our code will be available at \url{https://github.com/Xnhyacinth/SKIntern}.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
[101] proposed SKIntern, a framework that internalizes symbolic knowledge into SLM to improve CoT reasoning quality and efficiency.
“Furthermore, [101] proposed SKIntern, a framework that internalizes symbolic knowledge into SLM to improve CoT reasoning quality and efficiency”
From Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [101]
Cites
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · Cited by 1,749 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, these advanced reasoning and knowledge capabilities are typically modeled in larger models ( ≥ 13B), making it challenging to replicate in SLMs ( ≤ 7B) (Kaplan et al., 2020).”
AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models
Zhong, W., Cui, R., Guo, Y., Liang, Y., Lu, S., Wang, Y., Saied, A., Chen, W., & Duan, N. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.06364 · Cited by 211 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For OOD evaluation, we use BB-Sub filtered by CasCoD, and AGIEval (Zhong et al., 2023) sub-tasks about English multiple-choice questions.”
Adapting Language Models to Compress Contexts
Chevalier, A., Wettig, A., Ajith, A., & Chen, D. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 59 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…language model to calculate the self-information or error-proneness of tokens, removing those with lower error-proneness; Soft prompts methods (Chevalier et al., 2023; Mu et al., 2023) require fine-tuning LLM parameters to use learnable tokens for condensing prompts; Interpretable summaries…”
LLMLingua-2: Data Distillation for Efficient and Faithful Task-Agnostic Prompt Compression
Pan, Z., Wu, Q., Jiang, H., Xia, M., Luo, X., Zhang, J., Lin, Q., Rühle, V., Yang, Y., Lin, C.-Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 2 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Inspired by prompt compression works (Pan et al., 2024), we aim to gradually increase the compression rate to reduce the symbolic knowledge at the token-level determined by S t at t -th step and internalize it into the parameters, which can be expressed as: where LLMLingua2 (Pan et al., 2024)…”
Influential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models
Sui, Y., Chuang, Y.-N., Wang, G., Zhang, J., Zhang, T., Yuan, J., Liu, H., Wen, A., Zhong, S., Zou, N., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Furthermore, [49] proposed SKIntern, a framework that internalizes symbolic knowledge into SLM to improve CoT reasoning quality and efficiency, while [109] introduces SCORE, a pipeline that generates self-correction data from SLMs and fine-tunes the model to function as a self-correcting reasoner.”
- Authors
- Liao, H., He, S., Hao, Y., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., & Liu, K.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2409.13183
- OpenAlex
- W4403755015
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62376270)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- small language models, knowledge distillation, chain-of-thought, curriculum learning, progressive fine-tuning, few-shot learning, out-of-domain generalization, inference efficiency, reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review