PreprintCited by 1Topic ModelingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningNatural Language Processing Techniques

$\textit{SKIntern}$: Internalizing Symbolic Knowledge for Distilling Better CoT Capabilities into Small Language Models

Open access
Liao, Huanxuan, He, Shizhu, Hao, Yupu, Li, Xiang, Zhang, Yuanzhe, Zhao, Jun, Liu, Kang·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Small Language Models (SLMs) are attracting attention due to the high computational demands and privacy concerns of Large Language Models (LLMs). Some studies fine-tune SLMs using Chains of Thought (CoT) data distilled from LLMs, aiming to enhance their reasoning ability. Furthermore, Some CoT distillation methods introduce external symbolic knowledge into the generation process to improve the limited knowledge memory, reasoning ability and out-of-domain (OOD) generalization of SLMs. However, the introduction of symbolic knowledge increases computational overhead and introduces potential noise. In this paper, we introduce $\textit{SKIntern}$, an innovative approach that empowers SLMs to internalize symbolic knowledge and few-shot examples gradually through a progressive fine-tuning process, guided by a predefined linear decay schedule under curriculum learning. By efficiently internalizing knowledge, $\textit{SKIntern}$ reduces computational overhead and speeds up the reasoning process by focusing solely on the question during inference. It outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by over 5\%, while reducing inference costs (measured in FLOPs) by up to $4\times$ across a wide range of SLMs in both in-domain (ID) and out-of-domain (OOD) tasks. Our code will be available at \url{https://github.com/Xnhyacinth/SKIntern}.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2409.13183

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • [101] proposed SKIntern, a framework that internalizes symbolic knowledge into SLM to improve CoT reasoning quality and efficiency.

    “Furthermore, [101] proposed SKIntern, a framework that internalizes symbolic knowledge into SLM to improve CoT reasoning quality and efficiency”

    From Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [101]

Cites

  • Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models

    Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · Cited by 1,749 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “However, these advanced reasoning and knowledge capabilities are typically modeled in larger models ( ≥ 13B), making it challenging to replicate in SLMs ( ≤ 7B) (Kaplan et al., 2020).”
  • AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models

    Zhong, W., Cui, R., Guo, Y., Liang, Y., Lu, S., Wang, Y., Saied, A., Chen, W., & Duan, N. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.06364 · Cited by 211 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “For OOD evaluation, we use BB-Sub filtered by CasCoD, and AGIEval (Zhong et al., 2023) sub-tasks about English multiple-choice questions.”
  • Adapting Language Models to Compress Contexts

    Chevalier, A., Wettig, A., Ajith, A., & Chen, D. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 59 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “…language model to calculate the self-information or error-proneness of tokens, removing those with lower error-proneness; Soft prompts methods (Chevalier et al., 2023; Mu et al., 2023) require fine-tuning LLM parameters to use learnable tokens for condensing prompts; Interpretable summaries…”
  • LLMLingua-2: Data Distillation for Efficient and Faithful Task-Agnostic Prompt Compression

    Pan, Z., Wu, Q., Jiang, H., Xia, M., Luo, X., Zhang, J., Lin, Q., Rühle, V., Yang, Y., Lin, C.-Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 2 · cited 4× · see citing works

    “Inspired by prompt compression works (Pan et al., 2024), we aim to gradually increase the compression rate to reduce the symbolic knowledge at the token-level determined by S t at t -th step and internalize it into the parameters, which can be expressed as: where LLMLingua2 (Pan et al., 2024)…”
    Influential

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models

    Sui, Y., Chuang, Y.-N., Wang, G., Zhang, J., Zhang, T., Yuan, J., Liu, H., Wen, A., Zhong, S., Zou, N., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 2 · see citing works

    “Furthermore, [49] proposed SKIntern, a framework that internalizes symbolic knowledge into SLM to improve CoT reasoning quality and efficiency, while [109] introduces SCORE, a pipeline that generates self-correction data from SLMs and fine-tunes the model to function as a self-correcting reasoner.”

Authors
Liao, H., He, S., Hao, Y., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., & Liu, K.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403755015
Cited by
0
References
4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (62376270)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
small language models, knowledge distillation, chain-of-thought, curriculum learning, progressive fine-tuning, few-shot learning, out-of-domain generalization, inference efficiency, reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review