The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Harnessing the Potential of Gen-AI Coding Assistants in Public Sector Software Development
Open accessAbstract
The study on GitHub Copilot by GovTech Singapore's Engineering Productivity Programme (EPP) reveals significant potential for AI Code Assistant tools to boost developer productivity and improve application quality in the public sector. Highlighting the substantial benefits for the public sector, the study observed an increased productivity (coding / tasks speed increased by 21-28%), which translates into accelerated development, and quicker go-to-market, with a notable consensus (95%) that the tool increases developer satisfaction. Particularly, junior developers experienced considerable efficiency gains and reduced coding times, illustrating Copilot's capability to enhance job satisfaction by easing routine tasks. This advancement allows for a sharper focus on complex projects, faster learning, and improved code quality. Recognising the strategic importance of these tools, the study recommends the development of an AI Framework to maximise such benefits while cautioning against potential over-reliance without solid foundational programming skills. It also advises public sector developers to classify their code as "Open" to use Gen-AI Coding Assistant tools on the Cloud like GitHub Copilot and to consider self-hosted tools like Codeium or Code Llama for confidential code to leverage technology efficiently within the public sector framework. With up to 8,000 developers, comprising both public officers and vendors developing applications for the public sector and its customers, there is significant potential to enhance productivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The 34.9% reduction in task completion time and 26.2% improvement in test pass rates align with previous studies of the impact of GenAI programming assistants on both professional programmers [26, 28] and undergraduate students [13, 32] in greenfield programming scenarios.”
From The Effects of GitHub Copilot on Computing Students' Programming Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Processes in Brownfield Coding Tasks (2025) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“GenAI coding assistants have demonstrated considerable potential to enhance developer productivity.”
From The Effects of GitHub Copilot on Computing Students' Programming Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Processes in Brownfield Coding Tasks (2025) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists are queued
They are fetched later and appear here then.
Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Gold, A., Smith, J., & Davis, M. (2023). Evaluating AI Coding Assistants in Software Development: An Industry Perspective. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3597503.3608128 · DOI · Paper page
- Lee, S., Wang, H., & Davis, J. (2021). Understanding AI Assistant Use in Coding: A Review of Current Tools and Their Limitations. AI and Software Development Review, 23(2), 122-136.
- Mansour, H., Wu, P., & Nguyen, K. (2022). Evaluating the Effectiveness of AI Assistants in Software Development. Journal of AI in Software Engineering, 15(4), 205-218.
- Imai, S. (2022). "Is GitHub Copilot a substitute for human pair-programming? An empirical study," in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings, pp. 1-4. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9793778
- Schmidt, T., Sergeyuk, A., Golubev, Y., & Bryksin, T. (2024). Using AI-Based Coding Assistants in Practice: State of Affairs, Perceptions, and Ways Forward. ResearchGate. https: //www.researchgate.net/publication/381372621_Using_AI-Based_Coding_ Assistants_in_Practice_State_of_Affairs_Perceptions_and_Ways_Forward
- Pinto, G., de Souza, C., Rocha, T., Steinmacher, I., de Souza, A., & Monteiro, E. (2023). Developer Experiences with a Contextualized AI Coding Assistant: Usability, Expectations, and Outcomes. arXiv:2311.18452. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.18452 · DOI
- Wu, P., Mansour, H., & Nguyen, K. (2023). Contextual AI Assistants for Software Development: A Case Study on Internal API Integration. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/html/2404.12000v2#S4
- Sergeyuk, A., Golubev, Y., Bryksin, T., & Ahmed, I. (2024). Using AI-based coding assistants in practice: State of affairs, perceptions, and ways forward. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.07765 · DOI
- Tan, X., Long, X., Ni, X., Zhu, Y., Jiang, J., & Zhang, L. (2024). How far are AI-powered programming assistants from meeting developers' needs? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.12000 · DOI
- Elgedawy, R., Sadik, J., Dutta, S., Gautam, A., Georgiou, K., Gholamrezae, F., Ji, F., Lim, K., Liu, Q., & Ruoti, S. (2024). Occasionally secure: A comparative analysis of code generation assistants. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.00689 · DOI
- Golubev, Y., Sergeyuk, A., Bryksin, T., & Ahmed, I. (2023). Sea Change in Software Development: Economic and Productivity Analysis of the AI-Powered Developer Lifecycle. arXiv:2306.15033. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15033 · arXiv
Metadata
- Authors
- Ng, K. K., Fauzi, L., Leow, L., & Ng, J.
- Affiliations
- Government Technology Agency (SG)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2409.17434
- OpenAlex
- W4403795703
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- GitHub Copilot, public sector software development, developer productivity, code quality, developer satisfaction, junior developers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Harnessing the Potential of Gen-AI Coding Assistants in Public Sector Software Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2409.17434
- The paper
- Ng, K. K., Fauzi, L., Leow, L., & Ng, J. (2024). Harnessing the Potential of Gen-AI Coding Assistants in Public Sector Software Development. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2409.17434
