The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MinerU: An Open-Source Solution for Precise Document Content Extraction
Abstract
Document content analysis has been a crucial research area in computer vision. Despite significant advancements in methods such as OCR, layout detection, and formula recognition, existing open-source solutions struggle to consistently deliver high-quality content extraction due to the diversity in document types and content. To address these challenges, we present MinerU, an open-source solution for high-precision document content extraction. MinerU leverages the sophisticated PDF-Extract-Kit models to extract content from diverse documents effectively and employs finely-tuned preprocessing and postprocessing rules to ensure the accuracy of the final results. Experimental results demonstrate that MinerU consistently achieves high performance across various document types, significantly enhancing the quality and consistency of content extraction. The MinerU open-source project is available at https://github.com/opendatalab/MinerU.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“MinerU (Wang et al., 2024) Zhu et al. (2025a) PDF → MD / JSON High-precision; layout/reading-order faithful.”
From Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection
Wang, A., Chen, H., Liu, L., Chen, K., Lin, Z., Han, J., & Ding, G. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-3429 · Cited by 3,001
Jiang, A. Q., Sablayrolles, A., Mensch, A., Bamford, C., Chaplot, D. S., Casas, D. D. L., Bressand, F., Lengyel, G., Lample, G., Saulnier, L., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06825 · Cited by 340
From local to global: a graph rag approach to query-focused summarization
Edge, D., Trinh, H., Cheng, N., Bradley, J., Chao, A., Mody, A., Truitt, S., Metropolitansky, D., Ness, R. O., & Larson, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.16130 · Cited by 159
Cited by
Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future
Wu, S., Jiang, O., Zhao, Y., Hu, T., Ma, Y., Zhang, K., Patwardhan, M., & Cohan, A. (2026) · Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.1504 · Cited by 1
RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation
Wu, S., Ma, Y., Zhao, Y., Hu, T., Jiang, O., Patwardhan, M., & Cohan, A. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1696
Do Methods Support the Claims? Intra-Paper Verification for Peer Review
Ballakuraya, R. S., Mahyari, A., & Srinivasan, A. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.26066
“Academic papers in PDFs are converted into machine-readable Markdown using MinerU [25], after which novelty claims are extracted from the Introduction section using a fixed prompting strategy adopted from [10] as shown in Fig.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, B., Xu, C., Zhao, X., Ouyang, L., Wu, F., Zhao, Z., Xu, R., Liu, K., Qu, Y., Shang, F., Zhang, B., Wei, L., Sui, Z., Li, W., Shi, B., Qiao, Y., Lin, D., & He, C.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- arXiv
- 2409.18839
- References
- 4
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MinerU: An Open-Source Solution for Precise Document Content Extraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2409.18839
- The paper
- Wang, B., Xu, C., Zhao, X., Ouyang, L., Wu, F., Zhao, Z., Xu, R., Liu, K., Qu, Y., Shang, F., Zhang, B., Wei, L., Sui, Z., Li, W., Shi, B., Qiao, Y., Lin, D., & He, C. (2024). MinerU: An Open-Source Solution for Precise Document Content Extraction. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2409.18839
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
