The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
FlatQuant: Flatness Matters for LLM Quantization
Open accessAbstract
Recently, quantization has been widely used for the compression and acceleration of large language models (LLMs). Due to the outliers in LLMs, it is crucial to flatten weights and activations to minimize quantization error with equally spaced quantization points. Prior research explores various pre-quantization transformations to suppress outliers, such as per-channel scaling and Hadamard transformation. However, we observe that these transformed weights and activations can still exhibit steep and dispersed distributions. In this paper, we propose FlatQuant (Fast and Learnable Affine Transformation), a new post-training quantization approach that enhances the flatness of weights and activations. Our approach identifies optimal affine transformations for each linear layer, calibrated in hours via a lightweight objective. To reduce runtime overhead of affine transformation, we apply Kronecker product with two lightweight matrices, and fuse all operations in FlatQuant into a single kernel. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FlatQuant establishes a new state-of-the-art benchmark for quantization. For example, it achieves less than 1\% accuracy drop for W4A4 quantization on the LLaMA-3-70B model, surpassing SpinQuant by 7.5\%. Additionally, it provides up to 2.3x prefill speedup and 1.7x decoding speedup compared to the FP16 model. Code is available at: https://github.com/ruikangliu/FlatQuant.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FlatQuant adaptively learns separate Kronecker-decomposed affine transformations to mitigate outliers for each linear layer.
“Different from QuaRot, it adaptively learns separate Kronecker-decomposed affine transformations to mitigate outliers for each linear layer”
From Quantization Hurts Reasoning? An Empirical Study on Quantized Reasoning Models (2025) · cites this paper as Sun et al., 2024
The source domain of calibration data has a relatively small impact on other quantization methods such as KVQuant* and FlatQuant.
“Also, note that the source domain of the calibration data has a relatively small impact on other quantization methods such as KVQuant ∗ (Hooper et al., 2024), and FlatQuant (Sun et al., 2024).”
From Quantization Hurts Reasoning? An Empirical Study on Quantized Reasoning Models (2025) · cites this paper as Sun et al., 2024
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, Y., Liu, R., Bai, H., Bao, H., Zhao, K., Li, Y., Hu, J., Yu, X., Hou, L., Yuan, C., Jiang, X., Liu, W., & Yao, J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2410.09426
- OpenAlex
- W4403565099
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
- Keywords
- post-training quantization, large language models, affine transformation, Kronecker product, quantization error, Llama-3-70B
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review