Balanced Neural ODEs: nonlinear model order reduction and Koopman operator approximations
Open accessAbstract
Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) are a powerful framework for learning latent representations of reduced dimensionality, while Neural ODEs excel in learning transient system dynamics. This work combines the strengths of both to generate fast surrogate models with adjustable complexity reacting on time-varying inputs signals. By leveraging the VAE's dimensionality reduction using a nonhierarchical prior, our method adaptively assigns stochastic noise, naturally complementing known NeuralODE training enhancements and enabling probabilistic time series modeling. We show that standard Latent ODEs struggle with dimensionality reduction in systems with time-varying inputs. Our approach mitigates this by continuously propagating variational parameters through time, establishing fixed information channels in latent space. This results in a flexible and robust method that can learn different system complexities, e.g. deep neural networks or linear matrices. Hereby, it enables efficient approximation of the Koopman operator without the need for predefining its dimensionality. As our method balances dimensionality reduction and reconstruction accuracy, we call it Balanced Neural ODE (B-NODE). We demonstrate the effectiveness of this methods on several academic and real-world test cases, e.g. a power plant or MuJoCo data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neural ODEs can learn the underlying vector field that governs the battery's internal state evolution directly from data.
“Rather than prescribing a fixed mathematical structure (e.g., an equivalent circuit or reduced-order electrochemical model), Neural ODEs can learn the underlying vector field that governs the battery’s internal state evolution directly from data.34”
From State of mission: Battery management with neural networks and electrochemical AI (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
State of mission: Battery management with neural networks and electrochemical AI
Ozkan, C. S., & Ozkan, M. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.113593 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“34 This makes them especially attractive for capturing multi-scale, non-linear, and coupled processes that are otherwise difficult to model explicitly.”
- Authors
- Aka, J., Brunnemann, J., Eiden, J., Speerforck, A., & Mikelsons, L.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2410.10174
- OpenAlex
- W6924988585
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- TUHH Open Research (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- variational autoencoder, nonlinear model reduction, dimensionality reduction, surrogate models, time-varying inputs, power plant dynamics, MuJoCo
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review