The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personalized Adaptation via In-Context Preference Learning
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is widely used to align Language Models (LMs) with human preferences. However, existing approaches often neglect individual user preferences, leading to suboptimal personalization. We present the Preference Pretrained Transformer (PPT), a novel approach for adaptive personalization using online user feedback. PPT leverages the in-context learning capabilities of transformers to dynamically adapt to individual preferences. Our approach consists of two phases: (1) an offline phase where we train a single policy model using a history-dependent loss function, and (2) an online phase where the model adapts to user preferences through in-context learning. We demonstrate PPT's effectiveness in a contextual bandit setting, showing that it achieves personalized adaptation superior to existing methods while significantly reducing the computational costs. Our results suggest the potential of in-context learning for scalable and efficient personalization in large language models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“PPT [Lau et al., 2024] unlocks the potential of in-context learning for scalable and efficient personalization by generating two potential responses for each user prompt, asking the user to rank them, and incorporating this feedback into the model's context to dyanmic adapt to individual preferences over time.”
From A survey of personalized large language models: progress and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Lau et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“There are some other emerging personalized alignment studies beyond the”
From A survey of personalized large language models: progress and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Lau et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Supervised Pretraining Can Learn In-Context Reinforcement Learning
Lee, J. N., Xie, A., Pacchiano, A., Chandak, Y., Finn, C., Nachum, O., & Brunskill, E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.14892 · Cited by 7
Cited by
A survey of personalized large language models: progress and future directions
Liu, J., Qiu, Z., Li, Z., Dai, Q., Yu, W., Zhu, J., Hu, M., Yang, M., Chua, T.-S., & King, I. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.11528 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Lau, A., Choi, Y., Balazadeh, V., Chidambaram, K., Syrgkanis, V., & Krishnan, R. G.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- arXiv
- 2410.14001
- References
- 1
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.