Task-oriented Robotic Manipulation with Vision Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Vision Language Models (VLMs) play a crucial role in robotic manipulation by enabling robots to understand and interpret the visual properties of objects and their surroundings, allowing them to perform manipulation based on this multimodal understanding. Accurately understanding spatial relationships remains a non-trivial challenge, yet it is essential for effective robotic manipulation. In this work, we introduce a novel framework that integrates VLMs with a structured spatial reasoning pipeline to perform object manipulation based on high-level, task-oriented input. Our approach is the transformation of visual scenes into tree-structured representations that encode the spatial relations. These trees are subsequently processed by a Large Language Model (LLM) to infer restructured configurations that determine how these objects should be organised for a given high-level task. To support our framework, we also present a new dataset containing manually annotated captions that describe spatial relations among objects, along with object-level attribute annotations such as fragility, mass, material, and transparency. We demonstrate that our method not only improves the comprehension of spatial relationships among objects in the visual environment but also enables robots to interact with these objects more effectively. As a result, this approach significantly enhances spatial reasoning in robotic manipulation tasks. To our knowledge, this is the first method of its kind in the literature, offering a novel solution that allows robots to more efficiently organize and utilize objects in their surroundings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLMs often struggle with 3D distance estimation, object localization, and multi-step manipulation, leading to systematic failures in spatial awareness and interaction with physical environments.
“Concretely, LLMs often struggle with 3D distance estimation (Mecattaf et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2024a), object localization (Mecattaf et al., 2024), and multi-step manipulation (Guran et al., 2024), leading to systematic failures in both spatial awareness and interaction with physical environments.”
From Large Language Model Reasoning Failures (2026) · cites this paper as Guran et al., 2024
The Problem Statement (section 3; page unavailable) says VLMs often fail to capture complex spatial relationships and that this limits precise robotic manipulation. It does not specifically establish difficulty with multi-step manipulation or systematic failures across physical interactions. The distance-estimation and object-localization clauses are attributed to other citations, not Guran et al. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- J. Duan, W. Yuan, W. Pumacay, Y. R. Wang, K. Ehsani, D. Fox, and R. Kr- ishna, "Manipulate-anything: Automating real-world robots using vision-language models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18915, 2024. · arXiv
- A. Billard and D. Kragic, "Trends and challenges in robot manipulation," Science, vol. 364, no. 6446, p. eaat8414, 2019.
- D. Zhu, J. Chen, X. Shen, X. Li, and M. Elhoseiny, "Minigpt-4: Enhancing vision- language understanding with advanced large language models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592, 2023. · arXiv
- H. Liu, C. Li, Q. Wu, and Y. J. Lee, "Visual instruction tuning," Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 36, 2024.
- Y. Zheng, L. Yao, Y. Su, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, S. Zhao, Y. Zhang, and L.-P. Chau, "A survey of embodied learning for object-centric robotic manipulation," arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11537, 2024. · arXiv
- A. Kruzliak, J. Hartvich, S. P. Patni, L. Rustler, J. K. Behrens, F. J. Abu-Dakka, K. Mikolajczyk, V. Kyrki, and M. Hoffmann, "Interactive learning of physical ob- ject properties through robot manipulation and database of object measurements," in 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), p. 7596-7603, IEEE, Oct. 2024.
- J. Gao, B. Sarkar, F. Xia, T. Xiao, J. Wu, B. Ichter, A. Majumdar, and D. Sadigh, "Physically grounded vision-language models for robotic manipulation," in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 12462- 12469, IEEE, 2024.
- D. Driess, F. Xia, M. S. Sajjadi, C. Lynch, A. Chowdhery, B. Ichter, A. Wahid, J. Tompson, Q. Vuong, T. Yu, et al., "Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model," arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03378, 2023. · arXiv
- A. Brohan, N. Brown, J. Carbajal, Y. Chebotar, X. Chen, K. Choromanski, T. Ding, D. Driess, A. Dubey, C. Finn, et al., "Rt-2: Vision-language-action mod- els transfer web knowledge to robotic control," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15818, 2023. · arXiv
- J. Jiang, G. Cao, J. Deng, T.-T. Do, and S. Luo, "Robotic perception of transparent objects: A review," 2023.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large Language Model Reasoning Failures
Song, P., Han, P., & Goodman, N. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06176 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guran, N. B., Ren, H., Deng, J., & Xie, X.
- Affiliations
- Swansea University (GB)
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Xie, Xianghua
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 617-627
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2410.15863
- OpenAlex
- W7118010968
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- robotic manipulation, vision-language models, spatial reasoning, large language models, multimodal understanding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
